sanction violation (Rhode Island) · Go Syfert
← Rhode Island issues

sanction violation in Rhode Island

6 Rhode Island opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Coelhogreen
ri · 1982 · cited in 2 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 1997–1998
2 sentences

1998That conclusion was reached following diligent adherence to the sanction imposition guidelines set out by this Court in State v. Coelko, 454 A.2d 241, 244-45 (R.I.1982).

1997We conclude that the trial justice did not err and that he properly considered the sanction factors available to him as discussed in State v. Coelho, 454 A.2d 241 (R.I.1982).

12
Mapp v. Ohiogreen
scotus · 1961 · cited in 1 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
2 sentences

1983McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451 , 69 S.Ct. 191 , 93 L.Ed. 153 (1948); Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 , 34 S.Ct. 341 , 58 L.Ed. 652 (1914); see Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961) (Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures applicable to states).

1983McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451 , 69 S.Ct. 191 , 93 L.Ed. 153 (1948); Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 , 34 S.Ct. 341 , 58 L.Ed. 652 (1914); see Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961) (Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures applicable to states).

11
State v. Darcygreen
ri · 1982 · cited in 1 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
1 sentence

1983State v. Darcy, R.I., 442 A.2d 900, 902 (1982).

11
State v. Concannongreen
ri · 1983 · cited in 1 Rhode Island opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
1 sentence

1983As this court noted in State v. Concannon, R.I., 457 A.2d 1350, 1353 (1983), the imposition of a sanction for violation of Rule 16 involves the discretion of the trial justice; and in the fashioning of such a sanction, consideration should be given to the reason for the nondisclosure, the extent of the prejudice to the opposing party, the feasibility of rectifying by a continuance, and any other relevant factors.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. green
scotus · 1991
2 sentences

2016As noted, the sanction imposed on Dr. Bellafiore must be a consequence of instances where the trial justice found he “acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons.” Najarian, 911 A.2d at 711 n. 5 (quoting Chambers, 501 U.S. at 45-46 , 111 S.Ct. 2123 ).

2016As noted, the sanction imposed on Dr. Bellafiore must be a consequence of instances where the trial justice found he “acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons.” Najarian, 911 A.2d at 711 n. 5 (quoting Chambers, 501 U.S. at 45-46 , 111 S.Ct. 2123 ).

12016–2016
Pleasant Management, LLC v. Carrasco green
ri · 2007
2 sentences

2016Although we afford a trial justice wide latitude to fashion an appropriate remedy for sanc-tionable conduct, Carrasco, 918 A.2d at 217 , we are of the opinion that in this case the trial justice based his calculations on an erroneous assessment of the evidence.

2016Although we afford a trial justice wide latitude to fashion an appropriate remedy for sanctionable conduct, Carrasco, 918 A.2d at 217 , we are of the opinion that in this case the trial justice based his calculations on an erroneous assessment of the evidence.

12016–2016
Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Rhode Island v. Najarian green
ri · 2006
2 sentences

2016As noted, the sanction imposed on Dr. Bellafiore must be a consequence of instances where the trial justice found he “acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons.” Najarian, 911 A.2d at 711 n. 5 (quoting Chambers, 501 U.S. at 45-46 , 111 S.Ct. 2123 ).

2016As noted, the sanction 16 The trial justice specifically excluded expenses that were incurred in support of plaintiff’s claims against Dr. McNiece and SCH, as well as the costs of preparing exhibits that were “reusable.” 17 See footnote No. 7. - 25 - imposed on Dr. Bellafiore must be a consequence of instances where the trial justice found he “acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons.” Najarian, 911 A.2d at 711 n.5 (quoting Chambers, 501 U.S. at 45-46 ).

12016–2016
Weeks v. United States red
· 1914
2 sentences

1983McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451 , 69 S.Ct. 191 , 93 L.Ed. 153 (1948); Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 , 34 S.Ct. 341 , 58 L.Ed. 652 (1914); see Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961) (Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures applicable to states).

1983McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451 , 69 S.Ct. 191 , 93 L.Ed. 153 (1948); Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 , 34 S.Ct. 341 , 58 L.Ed. 652 (1914); see Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961) (Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures applicable to states).

11983–1983
McDonald v. United States green
scotus · 1948
2 sentences

1983McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451 , 69 S.Ct. 191 , 93 L.Ed. 153 (1948); Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 , 34 S.Ct. 341 , 58 L.Ed. 652 (1914); see Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961) (Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures applicable to states).

1983McDonald v. United States, 335 U.S. 451 , 69 S.Ct. 191 , 93 L.Ed. 153 (1948); Weeks v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 , 34 S.Ct. 341 , 58 L.Ed. 652 (1914); see Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 , 81 S.Ct. 1684 , 6 L.Ed.2d 1081 (1961) (Fourth Amendment prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures applicable to states).

11983–1983

Where else courts name it

OH 105 (1988–2026) MD 86 (1978–2025) IL 70 (1893–2026) NY 48 (1884–2026) FL 40 (1982–2025) TX 38 (1932–2024) AZ 35 (1954–2025) IA 32 (1919–2022) WA 31 (1914–2024) CA 29 (1986–2026) NJ 25 (1988–2025) NH 22 (1998–2025) UT 20 (2001–2026) IN 20 (1981–2020) OR 18 (1981–2026) CT 16 (1874–2024) CO 15 (1986–2025) MI 15 (1982–2023) MO 14 (1982–2012) PA 12 (1977–2024) WI 12 (1993–2020) NC 9 (1980–2015) MN 8 (1986–2013) ND 8 (1999–2003) AK 7 (1985–2025) KY 7 (2009–2025) KS 7 (1999–2022) LA 6 (1988–2017) MA 6 (1987–2025) RI 6 (1983–2016) NM 6 (1998–2018) HI 5 (1978–2021) DC 5 (1989–2016) NE 5 (1991–2021) TN 5 (2000–2024) NV 4 (1976–2022) ME 4 (1979–2002) WY 4 (2013–2026) GA 3 (1991–2012) AR 3 (1991–2023) VA 3 (1905–2013) MS 3 (1874–2018) DE 3 (1972–2011) WV 2 (1983–1991)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check