5 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Harrison v. Tazewell County Department of Social Servicesgreen2 sentences2017Servs., 42 Va. App. 149, 161 , 590 S.E.2d 575, 581-82 (2004) (identifying the mental condition of both the child and parent as well as the child’s needs as factors relevant to determining a child’s best interests when terminating parental rights under Code § 16.1-283(C)(2)). - 11 - Moreover, the evidence supported the court’s findings under these factors. 2017Servs., 42 Va. App. 149, 161 , 590 S.E.2d 575, 581-82 (2004) (identifying the mental condition of both the child and parent as well as the child’s needs as factors relevant to determining a child’s best interests when terminating parental rights under Code § 16.1-283(C)(2)). - 11 - Moreover, the evidence supported the court’s findings under these factors. | 1 | 1 |
Campbell v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2016Rule 5A:18 requires a contemporaneous objection “to avoid unnecessary appeals, reversals and mistrials by allowing the trial judge to intelligently consider an issue and, if necessary, to take corrective action.” Campbell v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 476, 480 , 405 S.E.2d 1, 2 (1991) (en banc); see Brown v. Commonwealth, 279 Va. 210 , 217, 688 S.E.2d 185, 189 (2010). 2016Rule 5A:18 requires a contemporaneous objection “to avoid unnecessary appeals, reversals and mistrials by allowing the trial judge to intelligently consider an issue and, if necessary, to take corrective action.” Campbell v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 476, 480 , 405 S.E.2d 1, 2 (1991) (en banc); see Brown v. Commonwealth, 279 Va. 210 , 217, 688 S.E.2d 185, 189 (2010). | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Com.green1 sentence2016Rule 5A:18 requires a contemporaneous objection “to avoid unnecessary appeals, reversals and mistrials by allowing the trial judge to intelligently consider an issue and, if necessary, to take corrective action.” Campbell v. Commonwealth, 12 Va. App. 476, 480 , 405 S.E.2d 1, 2 (1991) (en banc); see Brown v. Commonwealth, 279 Va. 210 , 217, 688 S.E.2d 185, 189 (2010). | 1 | 1 |
Virginia Department of State Police v. Bartongreen2 sentences2007“However, the only grounds of appeal of the hearing officer’s decision [to the circuit court] is ‘that the determination is contradictory to law.’” Va. Dep’t of State Police v. Barton, 39 Va. App. 439, 445 , 573 S.E.2d 319, 322 (2002) (quoting Code § 2.2-3006). 2007“However, the only grounds of appeal of the hearing officer’s decision [to the circuit court] is ‘that the determination is contradictory to law.’” Va. Dep’t of State Police v. Barton, 39 Va. App. 439, 445 , 573 S.E.2d 319, 322 (2002) (quoting Code § 2.2-3006). | 1 | 1 |
Tatum v. Virginia Department of Agriculture & Consumer Servicesgreen2 sentences2007To support that contention, VDSP claims that the circuit court “necessarily had to assume that Thompson was confused about whether he was violating any rule or order of a superior to properly invoke the ‘void for vagueness’ standard.” Therefore, VDSP argues, the circuit court acted contrary to its standard of review and improperly resolved factual issues that had been “foreclosed by the findings of the hearing officer.” “Upon judicial review from the administrative grievance hearing, the circuit court, based on the record and sitting without a jury, may affirm, reverse or modify the hearing of 2007To support that contention, VDSP claims that the circuit court “necessarily had to assume that Thompson was confused about whether he was violating any rule or order of a superior to properly invoke the ‘void for vagueness’ standard.” Therefore, VDSP argues, the circuit court acted contrary to its standard of review and improperly resolved factual issues that had been “foreclosed by the findings of the hearing officer.” “Upon judicial review from the administrative grievance hearing, the circuit court, based on the record and sitting without a jury, may affirm, reverse or modify the hearing of | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Jamison v. Jamison
green
1 sentence1998Jamison v. Jamison, 3 Va. App. 644 (1987). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Virginia Board of Medicine v. Fetta
green
2 sentences1995Carpenter’s reliance on Virginia Board of Medicine v. Fetta, 12 Va.App. 1173 , 408 S.E.2d 573 (1991), aff'd, 244 Va. 276 , 421 S.E.2d 410 (1992), is misplaced. 1995Carpenter’s reliance on Virginia Board of Medicine v. Fetta, 12 Va.App. 1173 , 408 S.E.2d 573 (1991), aff'd, 244 Va. 276 , 421 S.E.2d 410 (1992), is misplaced. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Virginia Board of Medicine v. Fetta
green
2 sentences1995Carpenter’s reliance on Virginia Board of Medicine v. Fetta, 12 Va.App. 1173 , 408 S.E.2d 573 (1991), aff'd, 244 Va. 276 , 421 S.E.2d 410 (1992), is misplaced. 1995Carpenter’s reliance on Virginia Board of Medicine v. Fetta, 12 Va.App. 1173 , 408 S.E.2d 573 (1991), aff'd, 244 Va. 276 , 421 S.E.2d 410 (1992), is misplaced. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.