findings hearing in Connecticut

2014The court also referenced the findings and analysis of the trial court in Stratford v. Castater, Superior Court, judicial district of New Haven, Docket No. CV- 10-6011629-S (March 15, 2011), aff’d, 136 Conn. App. 522 , 46 A.3d 945 , cert. denied, 307 Conn. 903 , 53 A.3d 218 (2012).

2014The court also referenced the findings and analysis of the trial court in Stratford v. Castater, Superior Court, judicial district of New Haven, Docket No. CV- 10-6011629-S (March 15, 2011), aff’d, 136 Conn. App. 522 , 46 A.3d 945 , cert. denied, 307 Conn. 903 , 53 A.3d 218 (2012).

2014The court did not explicitly state that the action was frivolous or that the town did not have a colorable claim.12 Taken as a whole, however, the court’s memorandum of decision with respect to the town’s complaint and the defen- dant’s counterclaim supports the court’s ultimate con- clusion that the defendant was entitled to attorney’s fees, that is, the court’s findings and analysis ‘‘make the factual conclusion so obvious as to be inherent in the trial court’s decision.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Wilson, 111 Conn. App. 614, 622 , 960 A.2d 1056 (2008), cert. denied, 290 C

2014The court did not explicitly state that the action was frivolous or that the town did not have a colorable claim.12 Taken as a whole, however, the court’s memorandum of decision with respect to the town’s complaint and the defen- dant’s counterclaim supports the court’s ultimate con- clusion that the defendant was entitled to attorney’s fees, that is, the court’s findings and analysis ‘‘make the factual conclusion so obvious as to be inherent in the trial court’s decision.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Wilson, 111 Conn. App. 614, 622 , 960 A.2d 1056 (2008), cert. denied, 290 C

2014In the absence of such information, we decline to speculate as to the reasoning employed by the department in declining to accept these earlier referrals. 9 We granted the department’s petition for certification to appeal limited to the following questions: (1) ‘‘Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the judgment of the trial court or did it fail to properly credit the findings of the hearing officer?’’ and (2) ‘‘If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, did the Appellate Court properly determine that . . . § 420b- 120 (3) is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the plain

2014The court did not explicitly state that the action was frivolous or that the town did not have a colorable claim.12 Taken as a whole, however, the court’s memorandum of decision with respect to the town’s complaint and the defen- dant’s counterclaim supports the court’s ultimate con- clusion that the defendant was entitled to attorney’s fees, that is, the court’s findings and analysis ‘‘make the factual conclusion so obvious as to be inherent in the trial court’s decision.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Wilson, 111 Conn. App. 614, 622 , 960 A.2d 1056 (2008), cert. denied, 290 C

1998"Where as here, one of the stated reasons is sufficient to support the action of the commission, then that action should be sustained by the court." New Haven v. Freedom of Information Commission , 205 Conn. 767 , 778 (1988); see also Newton v. Keeney , supra, 234 Conn. 320 -21.

1996The standard was articulated in Volck v. Muzio, 204 Conn. 507 (1987), and reaffirmed in Schallenkamp, supra. The court does not find that the findings of the hearing officer are incompatible with the totality of the evidence.

1996The standard was articulated in Volck v. Muzio, 204 Conn. 507 (1987), and reaffirmed in Schallenkamp, supra. The court does not find that the findings of the hearing officer are incompatible with the totality of the evidence.

1995(Cal.App. 1 Dist. 1990), the court held that the findings by a hearing officer that the appellant's pit bull puppies were "dangerous animals" under a county ordinance, based on evidence that the parents of the puppies were fighting dogs, county employees testified that the puppies exhibited extremely aggressive behavior when caged together, and the owner was a known dog fighter, were insufficient where no expert evidence was presented on the cause an nature of the inherent dangerousness of the puppies. "[W]e find no evidence that these [then] six-month-old puppies confined in kennels constitut

1991On the issue of probable cause, the appellant argues that the arresting officer did not have a reasonable and articulable suspicion of illegal activity to justify an investigatory stop in the first instance, citing State v. Cofield, 22 Conn. App. 10 (1990).

1978Evening Sentinel v. National Organization for Women, supra, 28; Corey v. Avco-Lycoming Division, 163 Conn. 309, 322 , 307 A.2d 155 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1116 , 93 S. Ct. 903 , 34 L.

1978Evening Sentinel v. National Organization for Women, supra, 28; Corey v. Avco-Lycoming Division, 163 Conn. 309, 322 , 307 A.2d 155 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1116 , 93 S. Ct. 903 , 34 L.

1978Evening Sentinel v. National Organization for Women, supra, 28; Corey v. Avco-Lycoming Division, 163 Conn. 309, 322 , 307 A.2d 155 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1116 , 93 S. Ct. 903 , 34 L.

1978Evening Sentinel v. National Organization for Women, supra, 28; Corey v. Avco-Lycoming Division, 163 Conn. 309, 322 , 307 A.2d 155 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1116 , 93 S. Ct. 903 , 34 L.

1978Evening Sentinel v. National Organization for Women, supra, 28; Corey v. Avco-Lycoming Division, 163 Conn. 309, 322 , 307 A.2d 155 , cert. denied, 409 U.S. 1116 , 93 S. Ct. 903 , 34 L.

1956State v. Scott, 80 Conn. 317, 321 , 68 A. 258 ; see State v. DiLorenzo, 138 Conn. 281, 284 , 83 A.2d 479 .” Section 7407 (b) of the General Statutes provides, in part: “The findings of the hearing tribunal as to the facts, if supported by substantial and competent evidence, shall be conclusive.” The meaning of the words “substantial and competent evidence” has been thoroughly considered and discussed by our court in International Brotherhood v. Commission on Civil Rights, 140 Conn. 537, pp. 542-544 , inclusive.

1956State v. Scott, 80 Conn. 317, 321 , 68 A. 258 ; see State v. DiLorenzo, 138 Conn. 281, 284 , 83 A.2d 479 .” Section 7407 (b) of the General Statutes provides, in part: “The findings of the hearing tribunal as to the facts, if supported by substantial and competent evidence, shall be conclusive.” The meaning of the words “substantial and competent evidence” has been thoroughly considered and discussed by our court in International Brotherhood v. Commission on Civil Rights, 140 Conn. 537, pp. 542-544 , inclusive.

1956State v. Scott, 80 Conn. 317, 321 , 68 A. 258 ; see State v. DiLorenzo, 138 Conn. 281, 284 , 83 A.2d 479 .” Section 7407 (b) of the General Statutes provides, in part: “The findings of the hearing tribunal as to the facts, if supported by substantial and competent evidence, shall be conclusive.” The meaning of the words “substantial and competent evidence” has been thoroughly considered and discussed by our court in International Brotherhood v. Commission on Civil Rights, 140 Conn. 537, pp. 542-544 , inclusive.

1938State v. Klein, 97 Conn. 321, 327 , 116 Atl. 596 .

1938State v. Klein, 97 Conn. 321, 327 , 116 Atl. 596 .