findings hearing (Alabama) · Go Syfert
← Alabama issues

findings hearing in Alabama

7 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1993–2011 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
STATE PERSONNEL DEPT. v. Maysgreen
alacivapp · 1993 · cited in 2 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1998–2001
2 sentences

2001Relying on State Personnel Department v. Mays , 624 So.2d 194 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993), the Court of Civil Appeals concluded that the circuit court had correctly set aside the ruling of the Board because, quoting from Mays , "`the Board's rejection of the findings of the hearing officer was done without substantial justification and was, therefore, unreasonable, arbitrary, and capricious. § 41-22-20 (k)(7), Code 1975.'" 624 So.2d at 198 .

2001Relying on State Personnel Department v. Mays , 624 So.2d 194 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993), the Court of Civil Appeals concluded that the circuit court had correctly set aside the ruling of the Board because, quoting from Mays , "`the Board's rejection of the findings of the hearing officer was done without substantial justification and was, therefore, unreasonable, arbitrary, and capricious. § 41-22-20 (k)(7), Code 1975.'" 624 So.2d at 198 .

12
Dubose v. Stategreen
ala · 1995 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011See Ex parte Dubose, 662 So.2d 1189, 1192 (Ala.1995) (holding that to be entitled to funds for expert assistance ‘[a] defendant must show a reasonable probability that an expert would aid in his defense and that at trial would result in a fundamentally unfair trial’); see also Chandler v. United States, 218 F.3d [1305] at 1315 [ (11th *33 Cir.2000) ] (holding that ‘for a petitioner to show that the conduct was unreasonable, a petitioner must establish that no competent counsel would have taken the action that his counsel did take’).

11
Ex Parte Jacksongreen
ala · 2002 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009
1 sentence

2009Ex parte Jackson, 836 So.2d 979, 988-991 (Ala.2002).

11
Wiggins v. Smith, Wardengreen
scotus · 2003 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2008–2008
2 sentences

2008The circuit court made the following findings on this claim: “The instant case is similarly distinguishable from Wiggins [v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510, 534 (2003) ], because trial counsel presented the vast majority of mitigation evidence that Ferguson alleges should have been presented.

2008The circuit court made the following findings on this claim: "The instant case is similarly distinguishable from Wiggins [v. Smith, 539 U.S. 510, 534 (2003)], because trial counsel presented the vast majority of mitigation evidence that Ferguson alleges should have been presented.

11
Ex Parte Pielachgreen
ala · 1996 · cited in 1 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
1 sentence

2002See Pielach, supra .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Personnel Bd. of State v. King green
alacivapp · 1984
1 sentence

1998This court has held that when an administrative agency rejects the findings of a hearing officer, its supporting evidence "must be stronger than would be required in cases where the findings are accepted, since... the supporting evidence must be deemed substantial when measured against the [hearing officer's] contrary findings as well as the opposing evidence." State Personnel Dep't v. Mays, 624 So.2d 194, 196 (Ala.Civ.App. 1993) (citing Personnel Bd. v. King, 456 So.2d 80 (Ala.Civ.App.1984)).

11998–1998
Thompson v. Alabama Dept. of Mental Health green
alacivapp · 1985
1 sentence

1993Thompson v. Alabama Dep't of Mental Health , 477 So.2d 427 (Ala.Civ.App. 1985).

11993–1993

Where else courts name it

NY 139 (1932–2025) CA 89 (1896–2026) MD 65 (1972–2020) IN 61 (1975–2025) PA 58 (1934–2024) IL 55 (1955–2025) RI 38 (1981–2025) OR 37 (1954–2025) FL 34 (1910–2024) OH 24 (1983–2026) CO 24 (1974–2024) TX 23 (1920–2024) AR 19 (1989–2021) MO 19 (1960–2025) ID 19 (1983–2013) MI 18 (1982–2025) AZ 18 (1974–2024) UT 18 (1980–2026) NC 18 (1953–2020) MA 17 (1979–2025) TN 16 (2000–2018) LA 14 (1985–2025) MN 13 (1952–2016) NM 12 (1892–2022) WA 11 (1973–2024) CT 11 (1938–2014) NJ 11 (1954–2025) ME 10 (1982–2023) MS 10 (1987–2016) KS 10 (1926–2024) DC 8 (1969–2021) MT 7 (1923–2019) WI 7 (1969–2021) AL 7 (1993–2011) ND 6 (1980–2025) SC 6 (1934–2011) GA 6 (1961–2019) AK 6 (1981–1993) SD 5 (1983–2021) VT 5 (1923–2007) VA 5 (1995–2017) KY 3 (1980–1989) WY 3 (1995–2023) WV 2 (1981–2005) NE 2 (1895–1988) NH 2 (1975–1989)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check