findings hearing in Colorado

1998See Gonzales v. Industrial Commission, 740 P.2d 999 (Colo.1987); Keil v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 847 P.2d 235 (Colo.App.1993).

1998Keil v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 847 P.2d 235 (Colo.App.1993).

1985Ricci v. Davis, 627 P.2d 1111 (Colo.1981); Blair v. Lovett, 196 Colo. 118 , 582 P.2d 668 (1978).

1985Ricci v. Davis, 627 P.2d 1111 (Colo.1981); Blair v. Lovett, 196 Colo. 118 , 582 P.2d 668 (1978).

2024However, the court did not need to make findings on every statutorily enumerated factor so long as (1) there is “some indication in the record that the trial court considered” the pertinent factors, Garst, 955 P.2d at 1058 ; and (2) the court made sufficient findings to explain its parenting time allocation and its determination that allowing father to be the primary parent was in 23 S.P.’s best interests, see In re Marriage of Collins, 2023 COA 116M , ¶ 12. ¶ 52 Ultimately, while the court considered the evidence relevant to the move, it concluded that S.P.’s best interests were served by mov

1997We recognize respondent’s conduct, as reflected in the findings of the hearing board, is not as aggravated as that of his son-in-law in People v. Vigil, 929 P.2d 1311 (Colo.1996), and therefore we do not find disbarment necessary. *416 III.

1996Unless we do adopt such a litany, it seems to me, so long as “a trial court applies correct standards, makes necessary findings to establish a waiver, and evidence exists to support those findings, then the trial court’s findings of waiver [should] not be disturbed on review.” Gray, 920 P.2d at 790 (citing Curtis, 681 P.2d at 515 and Roelker v. People, 804 P.2d 1336, 1339 (Colo.1991)).

1996Unless we do adopt such a litany, it seems to me, so long as "a trial court applies correct standards, makes necessary findings to establish a waiver, and evidence exists to support those findings, then the trial court's findings of waiver [should] not be disturbed on review." Gray, 920 P.2d at 790 (citing Curtis, 681 P.2d at 515 and Roelker v. People, 804 P.2d 1336, 1339 (Colo.1991)).

1996Unless we do adopt such a litany, it seems to me, so long as "a trial court applies correct standards, makes necessary findings to establish a waiver, and evidence exists to support those findings, then the trial court's findings of waiver [should] not be disturbed on review." Gray, 920 P.2d at 790 (citing Curtis, 681 P.2d at 515 and Roelker v. People, 804 P.2d 1336, 1339 (Colo.1991)).

1993Collins v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 813 P.2d 804 (Colo.App.1991); Zelingers v. Industrial Commission, supra. Even if the findings of the hearing officer support the application of one of the disqualifying sections of the statute, a claimant may still be entitled to benefits if the totality of the circumstances establishes that the claimant was discharged through “no fault” of his own.

1993Zelingers v. Industrial Commission, supra. Accordingly, in reliance on Hospital Shared Services v. Industrial Commission, 677 P.2d 447 (Colo.App.1984) and Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Keenan, 731 P.2d 708 (Colo.1987), claimant argues that he was not “at fault” for his separation because he had not been given the benefit of employer’s stated disciplinary procedures prior to his termination.

1993Zelingers v. Industrial Commission, supra. Accordingly, in reliance on Hospital Shared Services v. Industrial Commission, 677 P.2d 447 (Colo.App.1984) and Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. Keenan, 731 P.2d 708 (Colo.1987), claimant argues that he was not “at fault” for his separation because he had not been given the benefit of employer’s stated disciplinary procedures prior to his termination.

1989However, exercising our independent judgment in arriving at the appropriate level of discipline, see People v. Brown, 726 P.2d 638 (Colo.1986), we conclude that in view of the respondent’s pattern of misconduct, the multiple offenses, the vulnerability of his clients, and his failure to make restitution in a timely fashion, the recommended sixty-day suspension is not an appropriate sanction.

1989Clark v. Colorado State University, 762 P.2d 698 (Colo. App.1988).

1988In adopting the findings of the hearing panel that the respondent be disbarred, we found that the respondent had engaged in “mass abandonment of the interests of his entire clientele which indicates a complete lack of responsibility on the part of the respondent.” Id. at 255 , 539 P.2d at 129 .

1988In adopting the findings of the hearing panel that the respondent be disbarred, we found that the respondent had engaged in “mass abandonment of the interests of his entire clientele which indicates a complete lack of responsibility on the part of the respondent.” Id. at 255 , 539 P.2d at 129 .

1985Again we agree. *1330 The Commission correctly determined that there was insufficient evidence to support the hearing officer’s finding that “claimant’s right ankle condition had worsened.” However, there was uncontro-verted evidence, both in the doctor’s report and in claimant’s testimony, that “claimant’s right ankle condition ... had caused the injury to claimant’s left ankle.” That evidence was sufficient to sustain a finding of “change of condition” under § 8-53-113, C.R.S. (1985 Cum.Supp.) A “change in condition” as used in § 8-53-113 means “a change in the claimant’s physical or mental

1982Dolan v. Rust, 195 Colo. 173 , 576 P.2d 560 (1978).

1982Dolan v. Rust, 195 Colo. 173 , 576 P.2d 560 (1978).

1977Section 24-4-106(7), C.R.S.1973; Hickman v. Colorado Real Estate Commission, 36 Colo.App. 76 , 534 P.2d 1220 (1975).

1977Section 24-4-106(7), C.R.S.1973; Hickman v. Colorado Real Estate Commission, 36 Colo.App. 76 , 534 P.2d 1220 (1975).

1974Lamb v. People, 174 Colo. 441 , 484 P.2d 798 (1971).

1974Lamb v. People, 174 Colo. 441 , 484 P.2d 798 (1971).