7 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Richard D. Meehan v. John W. MacY Jr., Chairman, Civil Service Commissiongreen2 sentences1977The court relied upon the following language from Meehan v. Macy, 392 F.2d 822, 839 (D.C. 1977The court relied upon the following language from Meehan v. Macy, 392 F.2d 822, 839 (D.C. | 2 | 2 |
Koepsell's Olde Popcorn Wagons, Inc. v. Koepsell's Festival Popcorn Wagons, Ltd.green1 sentence2021See Koepsell’s Olde Popcorn Wagons, Inc., 275 Wis. 2d 397, ¶6 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lessard v. Schmidt
green
2 sentences1999In fact, we note that on remand in Lessard v. Schmidt, 379 F. Supp. 1376 (E.D. 1974), the court did not again use the term "extreme likelihood." In describing the findings and standard of proof necessary for an order of commitment, the court wrote that they were " 'mental illness and imminent dangerousness to self or others beyond a reasonable doubt' based at minimum upon a recent act, attempt or threat to do substantial harm." Id. at 1381 . 1999In fact, we note that on remand in Lessard v. Schmidt, 379 F. Supp. 1376 (E.D. 1974), the court did not again use the term "extreme likelihood." In describing the findings and standard of proof necessary for an order of commitment, the court wrote that they were " 'mental illness and imminent dangerousness to self or others beyond a reasonable doubt' based at minimum upon a recent act, attempt or threat to do substantial harm." Id. at 1381 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Burton v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human Relations
green
2 sentences1975(Sec. 102.24, Stats.) Where a record was inadequate in a workmen’s compensation case, our court held that . . justice requires the record to be remanded for further hearing.” (Icke Construction Co. v. Industrial Comm. (1966), 30 Wis. 2d 63, 69 , 139 N. W. 2d 841 .) In another situation, this court remanded the record, there reinstating the findings of the hearing examiner but directing the department to consider the testimony already taken and “. . . such additional testimony as the parties wish to present on all issues in dispute . . . .” Burton v. ILHR Department (1969), 43 Wis. 2d 218 , 228 1975(Sec. 102.24, Stats.) Where a record was inadequate in a workmen’s compensation case, our court held that . . justice requires the record to be remanded for further hearing.” (Icke Construction Co. v. Industrial Comm. (1966), 30 Wis. 2d 63, 69 , 139 N. W. 2d 841 .) In another situation, this court remanded the record, there reinstating the findings of the hearing examiner but directing the department to consider the testimony already taken and “. . . such additional testimony as the parties wish to present on all issues in dispute . . . .” Burton v. ILHR Department (1969), 43 Wis. 2d 218 , 228 | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Wolff v. McDonnell
green
1 sentence1975Like much of the rest of administrative law, the findings requirement is a part of the common law.” See generally, id., chapter 16. 15 (1945), 247 Wis. 77 , 18 N. W. 2d 461 . 16 Id. at page 85. 17 The standards are set forth in footnote 1, supra. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
State Ex Rel. Heffernan v. Board of Fire & Police Commissioners
neutral
2 sentences1975Like much of the rest of administrative law, the findings requirement is a part of the common law.” See generally, id., chapter 16. 15 (1945), 247 Wis. 77 , 18 N. W. 2d 461 . 16 Id. at page 85. 17 The standards are set forth in footnote 1, supra. 1975Like much of the rest of administrative law, the findings requirement is a part of the common law.” See generally, id., chapter 16. 15 (1945), 247 Wis. 77 , 18 N. W. 2d 461 . 16 Id. at page 85. 17 The standards are set forth in footnote 1, supra. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Icke Construction Co. v. Industrial Commission
green
2 sentences1975(Sec. 102.24, Stats.) Where a record was inadequate in a workmen’s compensation case, our court held that . . justice requires the record to be remanded for further hearing.” (Icke Construction Co. v. Industrial Comm. (1966), 30 Wis. 2d 63, 69 , 139 N. W. 2d 841 .) In another situation, this court remanded the record, there reinstating the findings of the hearing examiner but directing the department to consider the testimony already taken and “. . . such additional testimony as the parties wish to present on all issues in dispute . . . .” Burton v. ILHR Department (1969), 43 Wis. 2d 218 , 228 1975(Sec. 102.24, Stats.) Where a record was inadequate in a workmen’s compensation case, our court held that . . justice requires the record to be remanded for further hearing.” (Icke Construction Co. v. Industrial Comm. (1966), 30 Wis. 2d 63, 69 , 139 N. W. 2d 841 .) In another situation, this court remanded the record, there reinstating the findings of the hearing examiner but directing the department to consider the testimony already taken and “. . . such additional testimony as the parties wish to present on all issues in dispute . . . .” Burton v. ILHR Department (1969), 43 Wis. 2d 218 , 228 | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Air Power Equipment Corp. v. Telemark Co.
neutral
2 sentences1969Air Power Equipment Corp. v. Telemark Co. (1967), 34 Wis. 2d 699, 702 , 150 N. W. 2d 457 . 1969Air Power Equipment Corp. v. Telemark Co. (1967), 34 Wis. 2d 699, 702 , 150 N. W. 2d 457 . | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.