Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1934–2011 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Shealy v. Aiken Countygreen2 sentences2011See Shealy v. Aiken County, 341 S.C. 448 , 535 S.E.2d 438 (2000) (stating the final determination of witness credibility is reserved to the Commission); cf. Wallace v. Milliken & Co., 300 S.C. 553 , 389 S.E.2d 448 (Ct.App.1990) (observing in matters where this Court may take its own view of the preponderance of the evidence, an appellate court need not disregard the findings of the hearing tribunal, which occupies a much better position to evaluate the credibility of witnesses). 2011See Shealy v. Aiken County, 341 S.C. 448 , 535 S.E.2d 438 (2000) (stating the final determination of witness credibility is reserved to the Commission); cf. Wallace v. Milliken & Co., 300 S.C. 553 , 389 S.E.2d 448 (Ct.App.1990) (observing in matters where this Court may take its own view of the preponderance of the evidence, an appellate court need not disregard the findings of the hearing tribunal, which occupies a much better position to evaluate the credibility of witnesses). | 1 | 1 |
Grant v. Grantgreen1 sentence1961Defendant further contends that the Court should have taken into consideration the interest of the State in that the sanctity of marriage and the public interest are involved and cites Fogel v. McDonald, 159 S. C. 506, 157 S. E. 830 , and Grant v. Grant, 233 S. C. 433, 105 S. E. (2d) 523 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wallace v. Milliken & Co.
green
2 sentences2011See Shealy v. Aiken County, 341 S.C. 448 , 535 S.E.2d 438 (2000) (stating the final determination of witness credibility is reserved to the Commission); cf. Wallace v. Milliken & Co., 300 S.C. 553 , 389 S.E.2d 448 (Ct.App.1990) (observing in matters where this Court may take its own view of the preponderance of the evidence, an appellate court need not disregard the findings of the hearing tribunal, which occupies a much better position to evaluate the credibility of witnesses). 2011See Shealy v. Aiken County, 341 S.C. 448 , 535 S.E.2d 438 (2000) (stating the final determination of witness credibility is reserved to the Commission); cf. Wallace v. Milliken & Co., 300 S.C. 553 , 389 S.E.2d 448 (Ct.App.1990) (observing in matters where this Court may take its own view of the preponderance of the evidence, an appellate court need not disregard the findings of the hearing tribunal, which occupies a much better position to evaluate the credibility of witnesses). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Gamble v. Stevenson
green
2 sentences2009Id. at 112 , 406 S.E.2d at 354 . 2009Id. at 112 , 406 S.E.2d at 354 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Pinckney v. Warren
green
2 sentences2005Id. at 387-88 , 544 S.E.2d at 623 . 2005Id. at 387-88 , 544 S.E.2d at 623 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Fogel v. McDonald
green
1 sentence1961Defendant further contends that the Court should have taken into consideration the interest of the State in that the sanctity of marriage and the public interest are involved and cites Fogel v. McDonald, 159 S. C. 506, 157 S. E. 830 , and Grant v. Grant, 233 S. C. 433, 105 S. E. (2d) 523 . | 1 | 1961–1961 |
King v. Wesner
green
1 sentence1941King v. Wesner, supra. In the second place the present appellants were respondents before the commission, on review of the findings of the hearing commissioner, and before the Circuit Court on appeal by claimant from the findings of the commission. | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Robertson v. Ætna Life Insurance
neutral
2 sentences1934That an expert must have peculiar skill to form an opinion upon the subject under investigation is held in Robertson v. Insurance Co., 37 Ga. App., 703 , 141 S. E., 504 . 1934That an expert must have peculiar skill to form an opinion upon the subject under investigation is held in Robertson v. Insurance Co., 37 Ga. App., 703 , 141 S. E., 504 . | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.