origin rule (Vermont) · Go Syfert
← Vermont issues

origin rule in Vermont

5 Vermont opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Moransais v. Heathmangreen
fla · 1999 · cited in 2 Vermont opinions naming this issue, 2013–2014
2 sentences

2014The origin of the rule “is subject to some debate and its application and parameters are somewhat ill-defined.” Moransais v. Heathman, 744 So. 2d 973, 979 (Fla. 1999). 9 tempered somewhat by § 552 of the Restatement Second, Torts, wherein tort recovery for pecuniary loss is permitted in situations where one negligently supplies information to another anticipating that the other will be guided and rely upon the information.”); William H.

2013The origin of the rule “is subject to some debate and its application and parameters are somewhat ill-defined.” Moransais v. Heathman, 744 So. 2d 973, 979 (Fla. 1999).

22
Langle v. Kurkulgreen
vt · 1986 · cited in 1 Vermont opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999See Langle v. Kurkul, 146 Vt. 513 , 510 A.2d 1301 (1986).

1999See Langle v. Kurkul, 146 Vt. 513 , 510 A.2d 1301 (1986).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Gregory v. Helvering green
scotus · 1935
1 sentence

2008While never yet applied in Vermont, the economic substance doctrine has a long history in federal caselaw. 7 The origin of this doctrine is the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Gregory v. Helvering, 293 U.S. 465 (1935).

12008–2008
United States v. Wade green
scotus · 1967
1 sentence

1971United States v. Wade, supra, 18 L.Ed.2d at 1157 and 1166.

11971–1971

Where else courts name it

PA 31 (1908–2024) IL 17 (1874–2017) CA 15 (1898–2026) GA 15 (1917–2024) NY 13 (1835–2018) TX 12 (1928–2005) ID 10 (1912–2025) MD 9 (1895–2025) MO 9 (1882–2025) WA 8 (1906–2003) IN 7 (1834–2000) LA 7 (1964–2002) TN 7 (1940–2019) WV 7 (1978–2007) OH 6 (1948–2021) WI 6 (1978–2020) SD 6 (1969–1978) NC 6 (1926–2019) IA 5 (1909–2001) VT 5 (1971–2014) VA 5 (1836–2020) OR 5 (1989–2020) FL 5 (1958–2022) MA 4 (1932–2011) KY 4 (1820–1964) MN 4 (1961–1996) NJ 3 (1967–2014) NE 3 (1984–1995) AZ 3 (1952–1984) AR 3 (1984–2010) AL 3 (1969–1994) WY 2 (1978–2020) NH 2 (1954–1965) AK 2 (1971–2016) MT 2 (1925–2006) KS 2 (1903–1966) DC 2 (1976–1978) HI 2 (2007–2015) MI 2 (1943–1976) CT 2 (1991–1992) CO 2 (1938–2025) NM 2 (1935–1974) RI 2 (1874–1946)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check