Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1834–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gaskin v. Beiergreen1 sentence2000Trimble, 201 Ind. 88, 115 , 166 N.E. 270, 279 (1929); Gaskin v. Beier, 622 N.E.2d 524, 529 (Ind.Ct.App.1993); Willsey v. Newlon, 161 Ind.App. 332, 333 , 316 N.E.2d 390, 391 (1974); but see Rush v. Carter, 468 N.E.2d 236, 238 (Ind.Ct.App.1984). 11 *781 Early on our supreme court explained the origin of the rule that the Separation of Powers Doctrine does not apply to local government: Article 3 of the constitution makes the power of each department exclusive and independent of the power of either of the others. | 1 | 1 |
Sarlls, City Clerk v. State, Ex Rel.green2 sentences2000Trimble, 201 Ind. 88, 115 , 166 N.E. 270, 279 (1929); Gaskin v. Beier, 622 N.E.2d 524, 529 (Ind.Ct.App.1993); Willsey v. Newlon, 161 Ind.App. 332, 333 , 316 N.E.2d 390, 391 (1974); but see Rush v. Carter, 468 N.E.2d 236, 238 (Ind.Ct.App.1984). 11 *781 Early on our supreme court explained the origin of the rule that the Separation of Powers Doctrine does not apply to local government: Article 3 of the constitution makes the power of each department exclusive and independent of the power of either of the others. 2000Trimble, 201 Ind. 88, 115 , 166 N.E. 270, 279 (1929); Gaskin v. Beier, 622 N.E.2d 524, 529 (Ind.Ct.App.1993); Willsey v. Newlon, 161 Ind.App. 332, 333 , 316 N.E.2d 390, 391 (1974); but see Rush v. Carter, 468 N.E.2d 236, 238 (Ind.Ct.App.1984). 11 *781 Early on our supreme court explained the origin of the rule that the Separation of Powers Doctrine does not apply to local government: Article 3 of the constitution makes the power of each department exclusive and independent of the power of either of the others. | 1 | 1 |
Willsey v. Newlongreen2 sentences2000Trimble, 201 Ind. 88, 115 , 166 N.E. 270, 279 (1929); Gaskin v. Beier, 622 N.E.2d 524, 529 (Ind.Ct.App.1993); Willsey v. Newlon, 161 Ind.App. 332, 333 , 316 N.E.2d 390, 391 (1974); but see Rush v. Carter, 468 N.E.2d 236, 238 (Ind.Ct.App.1984). 11 *781 Early on our supreme court explained the origin of the rule that the Separation of Powers Doctrine does not apply to local government: Article 3 of the constitution makes the power of each department exclusive and independent of the power of either of the others. 2000Trimble, 201 Ind. 88, 115 , 166 N.E. 270, 279 (1929); Gaskin v. Beier, 622 N.E.2d 524, 529 (Ind.Ct.App.1993); Willsey v. Newlon, 161 Ind.App. 332, 333 , 316 N.E.2d 390, 391 (1974); but see Rush v. Carter, 468 N.E.2d 236, 238 (Ind.Ct.App.1984). 11 *781 Early on our supreme court explained the origin of the rule that the Separation of Powers Doctrine does not apply to local government: Article 3 of the constitution makes the power of each department exclusive and independent of the power of either of the others. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rush v. Cartergreen1 sentence2000Trimble, 201 Ind. 88, 115 , 166 N.E. 270, 279 (1929); Gaskin v. Beier, 622 N.E.2d 524, 529 (Ind.Ct.App.1993); Willsey v. Newlon, 161 Ind.App. 332, 333 , 316 N.E.2d 390, 391 (1974); but see Rush v. Carter, 468 N.E.2d 236, 238 (Ind.Ct.App.1984). 11 *781 Early on our supreme court explained the origin of the rule that the Separation of Powers Doctrine does not apply to local government: Article 3 of the constitution makes the power of each department exclusive and independent of the power of either of the others. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District
red
2 sentences1968As stated in Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District, 55 Cal. 2d 211 , 11 Cal. Rptr. 89 , 359 P. 2d 457, 460 , ‘The rule of governmental immunity for tort is an anachronism, without rational basis, and has existed only by the force of inertia/ “Even the origin of this doctrine contains some elements of the mysterious. 1968As stated in Muskopf v. Corning Hospital District, 55 Cal. 2d 211 , 11 Cal. Rptr. 89 , 359 P. 2d 457, 460 , ‘The rule of governmental immunity for tort is an anachronism, without rational basis, and has existed only by the force of inertia/ “Even the origin of this doctrine contains some elements of the mysterious. | 2 | 1968–1968 |
O'Connor v. O'Connor
green
2 sentences1972For a scholarly examination of the origin of the rule see Judge Staton’s excellent dissenting opinion in Alderson v. Alderson, supra. The general application of the doctrine of estoppel as set forth in Sidebottom was somewhat limited by our decision in O’Connor v. O’Connor (1989), 253 Ind. 295 , 253 N. E. 2d 250 . 1972For a scholarly examination of the origin of the rule see Judge Staton’s excellent dissenting opinion in Alderson v. Alderson, supra. The general application of the doctrine of estoppel as set forth in Sidebottom was somewhat limited by our decision in O’Connor v. O’Connor (1989), 253 Ind. 295 , 253 N. E. 2d 250 . | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Little v. Hackett
green
2 sentences1915The doctrine announced in that decision was criticized as being unsound and not followed by Justice Fields in speaking for the court in the case of Little v. Hackett (1886), 116 U. S. 366 , 6 Sup. Ct. 391, 29 L. 1915The doctrine announced in that decision was criticized as being unsound and not followed by Justice Fields in speaking for the court in the case of Little v. Hackett (1886), 116 U. S. 366 , 6 Sup. Ct. 391, 29 L. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Van Keuren v. . Parmelee
neutral
1 sentence1898The origin of the rule is fully considered and set forth in Van Keuran v. Parmelee, 2 N. Y. 523 . | 1 | 1898–1898 |
Lessee of Clarke v. Courtney
green
1 sentence1834Lessee of Clarke et al. v. Courtney et al. 5 Peters, 319, 344 . | 1 | 1834–1834 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.