Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
MacKey v. Montrymgreen2 sentences2004See, e.g., Mackey, 443 U.S. at 11-19 ; Mentor v. Nelson, 31 Wn. 2004See, e.g., Mackey, 443 U.S. at 11-19 ; Mentor v. Nelson, 31 Wn. | 2 | 2 |
Mathews v. Eldridgegreen2 sentences2004See Eldridge, 424 U.S. at 335 ; In re Det. of C.W., 147 Wn.2d 259, 277 , 53 P.3d 979 (2002) (applying the Eldridge test). 2004See Eldridge, 424 U.S. at 335 ; In re Det. of C.W., 147 Wn.2d 259, 277 , 53 P.3d 979 (2002) (applying the Eldridge test). | 2 | 2 |
Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.green2 sentences1984However, in Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs., 452 U.S. 18, 26-27 , 68 L. Ed. 2d 640 , 101 S. Ct. 2153 (1981), the Supreme Court *268 held that, when it is asserted that due process requires appointed counsel, the Eldridge factors must be balanced against a presumption that an indigent litigant has such a right "only when, if he loses, he may be deprived of his physical liberty." Lassiter, 452 U.S. at 27 . 1984However, in Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs., 452 U.S. 18, 26-27 , 68 L. Ed. 2d 640 , 101 S. Ct. 2153 (1981), the Supreme Court *268 held that, when it is asserted that due process requires appointed counsel, the Eldridge factors must be balanced against a presumption that an indigent litigant has such a right "only when, if he loses, he may be deprived of his physical liberty." Lassiter, 452 U.S. at 27 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Detention of CW
green
2 sentences2004See Eldridge, 424 U.S. at 335 ; In re Det. of C.W., 147 Wn.2d 259, 277 , 53 P.3d 979 (2002) (applying the Eldridge test). 2004See Eldridge, 424 U.S. at 335 ; In re Det. of C.W., 147 Wn.2d 259, 277 , 53 P.3d 979 (2002) (applying the Eldridge test). | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Mentor v. Nelson
neutral
2 sentences2004See, e.g., Mackey, 443 U.S. at 11-19 ; Mentor v. Nelson, 31 Wn. 2004See, e.g., Mackey, 443 U.S. at 11-19 ; Mentor v. Nelson, 31 Wn. | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Santosky v. Kramer
green
2 sentences1990Santosky, 455 U.S. at 758 . 1990Santosky, 455 U.S. at 758 . | 2 | 1990–1990 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.