Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ochoa v. Stategreen1 sentence2003Ochoa v. State, 848 P.2d 1359, 1865 (Wyo.1998); Powell v. Texas, 492 U.S. 680, 681 , 109 S.Ct. 3146, 8147-48 , 106 LEd.2d 551 (1989) (citing Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454, 461-69 , 101 S.Ct. 1866, 1872-76 , 68 LEd.2d 359 (1981)); see also Satterwhite v. Texas, 486 U.S. 249 , 108 S.Ct. 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d 284 (1988). | 1 | 1 |
Miller v. Stategreen1 sentence2003Miller v. State, 942 P.2d 1108, 1109 (Wyo. 1997). | 1 | 1 |
Murry v. Stategreen1 sentence2003Murry v. State, 713 P.2d 202, 208 (Wyo. 1986). | 1 | 1 |
Satterwhite v. Texasgreen2 sentences2003Ochoa v. State, 848 P.2d 1359, 1865 (Wyo.1998); Powell v. Texas, 492 U.S. 680, 681 , 109 S.Ct. 3146, 8147-48 , 106 LEd.2d 551 (1989) (citing Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454, 461-69 , 101 S.Ct. 1866, 1872-76 , 68 LEd.2d 359 (1981)); see also Satterwhite v. Texas, 486 U.S. 249 , 108 S.Ct. 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d 284 (1988). 2003Ochoa v. State, 848 P.2d 1359, 1865 (Wyo.1998); Powell v. Texas, 492 U.S. 680, 681 , 109 S.Ct. 3146, 8147-48 , 106 LEd.2d 551 (1989) (citing Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454, 461-69 , 101 S.Ct. 1866, 1872-76 , 68 LEd.2d 359 (1981)); see also Satterwhite v. Texas, 486 U.S. 249 , 108 S.Ct. 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d 284 (1988). | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. City of Caspergreen2 sentences1987Although involving the Governmental Claims Act, we would consider the reasoning in Davis v. City of Casper, Wyo., 710 P.2d 827, 829 (1985) to be persuasive and decisive: “ * * * The appellants argue that the torts occurred in 1976 when the governmental officers committed negligent acts. 1987Although involving the Governmental Claims Act, we would consider the reasoning in Davis v. City of Casper, Wyo., 710 P.2d 827, 829 (1985) to be persuasive and decisive: "* * * The appellants argue that the torts occurred in 1976 when the governmental officers committed negligent acts. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Roden v. State
green
1 sentence2010The prosecutor limited his inquiry to the amount of information necessary to demonstrate why it was not uncommon for Ott and Roden to exchange large sums of money, and "did not cross the line between permissible inquiry and prosecutorial overkill." Roden, ¶ 16, 225 P.3d at 502 . [T41] The State contends defense counsel opened the door to questioning Ms. Nelson about her prior use of drugs during the following exchange on direct examination: Q. [By defense counsel] On the 29th of July 2008, at the time [the informant] started calling you, did you have any cocaine? | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Powell v. Texas
green
2 sentences2003Ochoa v. State, 848 P.2d 1359, 1865 (Wyo.1998); Powell v. Texas, 492 U.S. 680, 681 , 109 S.Ct. 3146, 8147-48 , 106 LEd.2d 551 (1989) (citing Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454, 461-69 , 101 S.Ct. 1866, 1872-76 , 68 LEd.2d 359 (1981)); see also Satterwhite v. Texas, 486 U.S. 249 , 108 S.Ct. 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d 284 (1988). 2003Ochoa v. State, 848 P.2d 1359, 1865 (Wyo.1998); Powell v. Texas, 492 U.S. 680, 681 , 109 S.Ct. 3146, 8147-48 , 106 LEd.2d 551 (1989) (citing Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454, 461-69 , 101 S.Ct. 1866, 1872-76 , 68 LEd.2d 359 (1981)); see also Satterwhite v. Texas, 486 U.S. 249 , 108 S.Ct. 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d 284 (1988). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Estelle v. Smith
green
2 sentences2003Ochoa v. State, 848 P.2d 1359, 1865 (Wyo.1998); Powell v. Texas, 492 U.S. 680, 681 , 109 S.Ct. 3146, 8147-48 , 106 LEd.2d 551 (1989) (citing Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454, 461-69 , 101 S.Ct. 1866, 1872-76 , 68 LEd.2d 359 (1981)); see also Satterwhite v. Texas, 486 U.S. 249 , 108 S.Ct. 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d 284 (1988). 2003Ochoa v. State, 848 P.2d 1359, 1865 (Wyo.1998); Powell v. Texas, 492 U.S. 680, 681 , 109 S.Ct. 3146, 8147-48 , 106 LEd.2d 551 (1989) (citing Estelle v. Smith, 451 U.S. 454, 461-69 , 101 S.Ct. 1866, 1872-76 , 68 LEd.2d 359 (1981)); see also Satterwhite v. Texas, 486 U.S. 249 , 108 S.Ct. 1792 , 100 L.Ed.2d 284 (1988). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Durham v. State
green
2 sentences1995The state contends the rule of Durham v. State, 422 P.2d 691 (Wyo.1967) (per curiam), applies and does not require the court to define a term unless it has a definite, technical meaning under the law different from the ordinary meaning and which the jury might therefore not understand. 1995Durham, 422 P.2d at 692 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.