Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Alabama opinions name it 3 courts 1977–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tomlin v. Stategreen1 sentence2010See also Tomlin, 695 So.2d at 175 (juror’s failure to disclose pending charge of possession of cocaine warranted reversal of conviction). 6 The State contends that the presumption of prejudice was rebutted by L.A.’s testimony at the hearing on Dixon’s motion for a new trial that the fact that she had pending criminal charges against her did not affect her verdict. | 1 | 1 |
Campbell v. Stategreen1 sentence2010Under the facts of this case, we agree. “ “A party cannot assume inconsistent positions in the trial and appellate courts and, as a general rule, will not be permitted to allege an error in the trial court proceedings which was invited by him or was a natural consequence of his own actions.” ’ ” Slaton v. State, 680 So.2d 879, 900 (Ala.Crim.App.1995), aff'd, 680 So.2d 909 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997), quoting Campbell v. State, 570 So.2d 1276, 1282 (Ala.Crim.App.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Slaton v. Stategreen1 sentence2010Under the facts of this case, we agree. “ “A party cannot assume inconsistent positions in the trial and appellate courts and, as a general rule, will not be permitted to allege an error in the trial court proceedings which was invited by him or was a natural consequence of his own actions.” ’ ” Slaton v. State, 680 So.2d 879, 900 (Ala.Crim.App.1995), aff'd, 680 So.2d 909 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997), quoting Campbell v. State, 570 So.2d 1276, 1282 (Ala.Crim.App.1990). | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Landgreen1 sentence2006See Land , supra. Moreover, the State contends that this claim is procedurally barred in a postconviction proceeding and that a procedurally barred claim does not entitle a petitioner to relief; therefore, there can be no showing of good cause. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Landrum
green
1 sentence2010In State v. Landrum, 18 So.3d 424 (Ala.Crim.App.2009), this Court explained: “ ‘This Court reviews de novo a circuit court’s decision on a motion to suppress evidence when the facts are not in dispute. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Peterson v. Chater
green
1 sentence2010Under the facts of this case, we agree. “ “A party cannot assume inconsistent positions in the trial and appellate courts and, as a general rule, will not be permitted to allege an error in the trial court proceedings which was invited by him or was a natural consequence of his own actions.” ’ ” Slaton v. State, 680 So.2d 879, 900 (Ala.Crim.App.1995), aff'd, 680 So.2d 909 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997), quoting Campbell v. State, 570 So.2d 1276, 1282 (Ala.Crim.App.1990). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Loewe v. Rogers
green
1 sentence2010Under the facts of this case, we agree. “ “A party cannot assume inconsistent positions in the trial and appellate courts and, as a general rule, will not be permitted to allege an error in the trial court proceedings which was invited by him or was a natural consequence of his own actions.” ’ ” Slaton v. State, 680 So.2d 879, 900 (Ala.Crim.App.1995), aff'd, 680 So.2d 909 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997), quoting Campbell v. State, 570 So.2d 1276, 1282 (Ala.Crim.App.1990). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Ex Parte Slaton
green
1 sentence2010Under the facts of this case, we agree. “ “A party cannot assume inconsistent positions in the trial and appellate courts and, as a general rule, will not be permitted to allege an error in the trial court proceedings which was invited by him or was a natural consequence of his own actions.” ’ ” Slaton v. State, 680 So.2d 879, 900 (Ala.Crim.App.1995), aff'd, 680 So.2d 909 (Ala.1996), cert. denied, 519 U.S. 1079 , 117 S.Ct. 742 , 136 L.Ed.2d 680 (1997), quoting Campbell v. State, 570 So.2d 1276, 1282 (Ala.Crim.App.1990). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Evans v. State
green
1 sentence2003Citing Evans v. State, 794 So.2d 1234 (Ala.Crim.App.2000), the State contends that this error was harmless because the appellant admitted he had violated the terms and conditions of his probation and because he did not present any evidence to justify or mitigate the violation. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Ake v. Oklahoma
green
2 sentences1995The State contends that defense counsel in this case was not eligible for reasonable expenses under § 15-12-21 , Ala. Code 1975, because Dubose had a $10,000 "defense fund" and because the defense attorney was not "appointed." The State also contends that Dubose is not entitled to expert funds because, it argues, the holding of Ake v. Oklahoma , 470 U.S. 68 , 105 S.Ct. 1087 , 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985), does not extend beyond its application to psychiatric experts. 1995The State contends that defense counsel in this case was not eligible for reasonable expenses under § 15-12-21 , Ala. Code 1975, because Dubose had a $10,000 "defense fund" and because the defense attorney was not "appointed." The State also contends that Dubose is not entitled to expert funds because, it argues, the holding of Ake v. Oklahoma , 470 U.S. 68 , 105 S.Ct. 1087 , 84 L.Ed.2d 53 (1985), does not extend beyond its application to psychiatric experts. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Wells v. State
green
2 sentences1986In Wells v. State, 292 Ala. 256 , 292 So.2d 471 (1973), the Alabama Supreme Court addressed the issue whether a witness must be asked as to the state of his feelings towards the defendant as a condition precedent to asking the witness a specific question concerning his bias against the defendant. 1986In Wells v. State, 292 Ala. 256 , 292 So.2d 471 (1973), the Alabama Supreme Court addressed the issue whether a witness must be asked as to the state of his feelings towards the defendant as a condition precedent to asking the witness a specific question concerning his bias against the defendant. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
State v. Community Blood and Plasma Service, Inc.
green
2 sentences1977The State contends error in the reliance of the trial court upon the rule of Perlmutter v. Beth David Hospital, supra. It insists that the rule of Perlmutter was rejected in our case of State v. Community Blood & Plasma Service, Inc., 48 Ala.App. 658 , 267 So.2d 176 (1972). 1977The State contends error in the reliance of the trial court upon the rule of Perlmutter v. Beth David Hospital, supra. It insists that the rule of Perlmutter was rejected in our case of State v. Community Blood & Plasma Service, Inc., 48 Ala.App. 658 , 267 So.2d 176 (1972). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.