Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People of Michigan v. Kemo Knicombi Parksgreen2 sentences2025See People -15- v Parks, 510 Mich 225 , 243; 987 NW2d 161 (2022). 2025See People -15- v Parks, 510 Mich 225 , 243; 987 NW2d 161 (2022). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Whitegreen2 sentences1994White, supra at 275-277. 21 White, therefore, is scarce support for deviating from Strickland. 22 The contention that a more protective standard than Strickland is justified does find some support in State v Smith, 68 Hawaii 304, 309 ; 712 P2d 496 (1986), in which the court ruled that it would adhere to its prior holding in State v Antone, 62 Hawaii 346, 348-349 ; 615 P2d 101 (1980), that ineffective assistance of counsel could be found if the errors of defense counsel " 'resulted in either the withdrawal or substantial impairment of a potentially meritorious defense.’ ” 23 Unfortunately, the 1994White, supra at 275-277. [21] White, therefore, is scarce support for deviating from Strickland . [22] The contention that a more protective standard than Strickland is justified does find some support in State v Smith, 68 Hawaii 304, 309 ; 712 P2d 496 (1986), in which the court ruled that it would adhere to its prior holding in State v Antone, 62 Hawaii 346, 348-349 ; 615 P2d 101 (1980), that ineffective assistance of counsel could be found if the errors of defense counsel "`resulted in either the withdrawal or substantial impairment of a potentially meritorious defense.'" [23] Unfortunately, | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Blockburger v. United States
green
2 sentences2008Under Federal authority, the Supreme Court established the “required evidence” test enunciated in Blockburger v United States, 284 US 299 ; 52 S Ct 180 ; 76 L Ed 306 (1932). 2008Under Federal authority, the Supreme Court established the “required evidence” test enunciated in Blockburger v United States, 284 US 299 ; 52 S Ct 180 ; 76 L Ed 306 (1932). | 3 | 1981–2008 |
People v. Wilder
red
2 sentences2008We are similarly perplexed by Justice Kelly’s contention that Wilder is consistent with federal authority, post at 257, when Wilder itself stated that “the test concerning multiple punishment under our constitution has developed into a broader protective rule than that employed in the Federal courts.” Wilder, 411 Mich at 348 n 10. 2008We are similarly perplexed by Justice Kelly’s contention that Wilder is consistent with federal authority, post at 4, 5, when Wilder itself stated that “the test concerning multiple punishment under our constitution has developed into a broader protective rule than that employed in the Federal courts.” Wilder, 411 Mich at 348 n 10. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Antone
green
2 sentences1994White, supra at 275-277. 21 White, therefore, is scarce support for deviating from Strickland. 22 The contention that a more protective standard than Strickland is justified does find some support in State v Smith, 68 Hawaii 304, 309 ; 712 P2d 496 (1986), in which the court ruled that it would adhere to its prior holding in State v Antone, 62 Hawaii 346, 348-349 ; 615 P2d 101 (1980), that ineffective assistance of counsel could be found if the errors of defense counsel " 'resulted in either the withdrawal or substantial impairment of a potentially meritorious defense.’ ” 23 Unfortunately, the 1994White, supra at 275-277. 21 White, therefore, is scarce support for deviating from Strickland. 22 The contention that a more protective standard than Strickland is justified does find some support in State v Smith, 68 Hawaii 304, 309 ; 712 P2d 496 (1986), in which the court ruled that it would adhere to its prior holding in State v Antone, 62 Hawaii 346, 348-349 ; 615 P2d 101 (1980), that ineffective assistance of counsel could be found if the errors of defense counsel " 'resulted in either the withdrawal or substantial impairment of a potentially meritorious defense.’ ” 23 Unfortunately, the | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences1994White, supra at 275-277. 21 White, therefore, is scarce support for deviating from Strickland. 22 The contention that a more protective standard than Strickland is justified does find some support in State v Smith, 68 Hawaii 304, 309 ; 712 P2d 496 (1986), in which the court ruled that it would adhere to its prior holding in State v Antone, 62 Hawaii 346, 348-349 ; 615 P2d 101 (1980), that ineffective assistance of counsel could be found if the errors of defense counsel " 'resulted in either the withdrawal or substantial impairment of a potentially meritorious defense.’ ” 23 Unfortunately, the 1994White, supra at 275-277. 21 White, therefore, is scarce support for deviating from Strickland. 22 The contention that a more protective standard than Strickland is justified does find some support in State v Smith, 68 Hawaii 304, 309 ; 712 P2d 496 (1986), in which the court ruled that it would adhere to its prior holding in State v Antone, 62 Hawaii 346, 348-349 ; 615 P2d 101 (1980), that ineffective assistance of counsel could be found if the errors of defense counsel " 'resulted in either the withdrawal or substantial impairment of a potentially meritorious defense.’ ” 23 Unfortunately, the | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.