Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
30 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2025 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. McKyegreen2 sentences2020Federal courts of appeals applying this harmlessness standard to cases involving multiple theories of guilt have required varying degrees of proof of harm.20 See Sorich v. United States, 709 F.3d 670, 674 (7th Cir. 2013) (‘‘[w]e have described the [harmless error] inquiry . . . as a question of whether the trial evidence was such that the jury must have convicted the petitioners on both [alternative] theories’’), cert. denied, 571 U.S. 1131 , 134 S. Ct. 952 , 187 L. Ed. 2d 786 (2014); United States v. Jefferson, 674 F.3d 332, 361 (4th Cir.) (‘‘if the evidence that the jury necessarily credited 2020Federal courts of appeals applying this harmlessness standard to cases involving multiple theories of guilt have required varying degrees of proof of harm.20 See Sorich v. United States, 709 F.3d 670, 674 (7th Cir. 2013) (‘‘[w]e have described the [harmless error] inquiry . . . as a question of whether the trial evidence was such that the jury must have convicted the petitioners on both [alternative] theories’’), cert. denied, 571 U.S. 1131 , 134 S. Ct. 952 , 187 L. Ed. 2d 786 (2014); United States v. Jefferson, 674 F.3d 332, 361 (4th Cir.) (‘‘if the evidence that the jury necessarily credited | 2 | 2 |
Robert Sorich v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2020Federal courts of appeals applying this harmlessness standard to cases involving multiple theories of guilt have required varying degrees of proof of harm.20 See Sorich v. United States, 709 F.3d 670, 674 (7th Cir. 2013) (‘‘[w]e have described the [harmless error] inquiry . . . as a question of whether the trial evidence was such that the jury must have convicted the petitioners on both [alternative] theories’’), cert. denied, 571 U.S. 1131 , 134 S. Ct. 952 , 187 L. Ed. 2d 786 (2014); United States v. Jefferson, 674 F.3d 332, 361 (4th Cir.) (‘‘if the evidence that the jury necessarily credited 2020Federal courts of appeals applying this harmlessness standard to cases involving multiple theories of guilt have required varying degrees of proof of harm.20 See Sorich v. United States, 709 F.3d 670, 674 (7th Cir. 2013) (‘‘[w]e have described the [harmless error] inquiry . . . as a question of whether the trial evidence was such that the jury must have convicted the petitioners on both [alternative] theories’’), cert. denied, 571 U.S. 1131 , 134 S. Ct. 952 , 187 L. Ed. 2d 786 (2014); United States v. Jefferson, 674 F.3d 332, 361 (4th Cir.) (‘‘if the evidence that the jury necessarily credited | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Skillinggreen2 sentences2020Federal courts of appeals applying this harmlessness standard to cases involving multiple theories of guilt have required varying degrees of proof of harm.20 See Sorich v. United States, 709 F.3d 670, 674 (7th Cir. 2013) (‘‘[w]e have described the [harmless error] inquiry . . . as a question of whether the trial evidence was such that the jury must have convicted the petitioners on both [alternative] theories’’), cert. denied, 571 U.S. 1131 , 134 S. Ct. 952 , 187 L. Ed. 2d 786 (2014); United States v. Jefferson, 674 F.3d 332, 361 (4th Cir.) (‘‘if the evidence that the jury necessarily credited 2020Federal courts of appeals applying this harmlessness standard to cases involving multiple theories of guilt have required varying degrees of proof of harm.20 See Sorich v. United States, 709 F.3d 670, 674 (7th Cir. 2013) (‘‘[w]e have described the [harmless error] inquiry . . . as a question of whether the trial evidence was such that the jury must have convicted the petitioners on both [alternative] theories’’), cert. denied, 571 U.S. 1131 , 134 S. Ct. 952 , 187 L. Ed. 2d 786 (2014); United States v. Jefferson, 674 F.3d 332, 361 (4th Cir.) (‘‘if the evidence that the jury necessarily credited | 2 | 2 |
United States v. William Jeffersongreen2 sentences2020Federal courts of appeals applying this harmlessness standard to cases involving multiple theories of guilt have required varying degrees of proof of harm.20 See Sorich v. United States, 709 F.3d 670, 674 (7th Cir. 2013) (‘‘[w]e have described the [harmless error] inquiry . . . as a question of whether the trial evidence was such that the jury must have convicted the petitioners on both [alternative] theories’’), cert. denied, 571 U.S. 1131 , 134 S. Ct. 952 , 187 L. Ed. 2d 786 (2014); United States v. Jefferson, 674 F.3d 332, 361 (4th Cir.) (‘‘if the evidence that the jury necessarily credited 2020Federal courts of appeals applying this harmlessness standard to cases involving multiple theories of guilt have required varying degrees of proof of harm.20 See Sorich v. United States, 709 F.3d 670, 674 (7th Cir. 2013) (‘‘[w]e have described the [harmless error] inquiry . . . as a question of whether the trial evidence was such that the jury must have convicted the petitioners on both [alternative] theories’’), cert. denied, 571 U.S. 1131 , 134 S. Ct. 952 , 187 L. Ed. 2d 786 (2014); United States v. Jefferson, 674 F.3d 332, 361 (4th Cir.) (‘‘if the evidence that the jury necessarily credited | 2 | 2 |
State v. Sinclairgreen2 sentences2016Id., at 586 , 500 A.2d 539 . 2016Id., at 586 , 500 A.2d 539 . | 1 | 2 |
State v. Torresgreen2 sentences2024The harmlessness of an error depends [on] its impact on the trier and the result . . . .’’), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1119 , 106 S. Ct. 1635 , 90 L. Ed. 2d 181 (1986); see also State v. Torres, 343 Conn. 208 , 245, 273 A.3d 163 (2022) (Ecker, J., dissenting) (‘‘the legal sufficiency of the evidence is not the issue, and the . . . marshaling of evidence sufficient to support the conviction misapprehends the point of harmless error analysis’’). 2024The harmlessness of an error depends [on] its impact on the trier and the result . . . .’’), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1119 , 106 S. Ct. 1635 , 90 L. Ed. 2d 181 (1986); see also State v. Torres, 343 Conn. 208 , 245, 273 A.3d 163 (2022) (Ecker, J., dissenting) (‘‘the legal sufficiency of the evidence is not the issue, and the . . . marshaling of evidence sufficient to support the conviction misapprehends the point of harmless error analysis’’). | 1 | 1 |
Northeast Builders Supply & Home Centers, LLC v. RMM Consulting, LLCgreen1 sentence2022See State v. Russaw, 336 Conn. 933 , 248 A.3d 1 (2021). 11 Under Golding, a defendant may prevail on an unpreserved claim only if the record is adequate for review of the claim, the claim is of constitutional magnitude alleging the violation of a fundamental right, the alleged constitutional violation exists and deprived the defendant of a fair trial, and the state cannot demonstrate the harmlessness of the violation. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Thomasgreen1 sentence2021See, e.g., White v. State, 729 So. 2d 909, 915 (Fla. 1999); State v. Thomas, 750 So. 2d 1114, 1126 (La. App. 1999), writ denied, 795 So. 2d 1203 (La. 2001); Sanchez v. State, 272 Or. App. 226 , 241 n.10, 355 P.3d 172 , review denied, 358 Or. 449 , 366 P.3d 719 (2015); Ex parte Fierro, 934 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996), cert. denied sub nom. | 1 | 1 |
White v. Stategreen1 sentence2021See, e.g., White v. State, 729 So. 2d 909, 915 (Fla. 1999); State v. Thomas, 750 So. 2d 1114, 1126 (La. App. 1999), writ denied, 795 So. 2d 1203 (La. 2001); Sanchez v. State, 272 Or. App. 226 , 241 n.10, 355 P.3d 172 , review denied, 358 Or. 449 , 366 P.3d 719 (2015); Ex parte Fierro, 934 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996), cert. denied sub nom. | 1 | 1 |
Ex Parte Fierrogreen1 sentence2021See, e.g., White v. State, 729 So. 2d 909, 915 (Fla. 1999); State v. Thomas, 750 So. 2d 1114, 1126 (La. App. 1999), writ denied, 795 So. 2d 1203 (La. 2001); Sanchez v. State, 272 Or. App. 226 , 241 n.10, 355 P.3d 172 , review denied, 358 Or. 449 , 366 P.3d 719 (2015); Ex parte Fierro, 934 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996), cert. denied sub nom. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Nigel D. Incegreen1 sentence2019E.g., Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 765 , 66 S. Ct. 1239 , 90 L. Ed. 1557 (1946) (‘‘[t]he [harmlessness] inquiry cannot be merely whether there was enough to support the result’’); United States v. Ince, 21 F.3d 576, 583 (4th Cir. 1994) (‘‘more [stringent]’’ harmless error inquiry ‘‘does not ask simply whether we believe that irrespective of the error there was sufficient untainted evidence to convict,’’ but ‘‘whether we believe it highly probable that the error did not affect the judgment’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]). | 1 | 1 |
Nino v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2016See United States v. Brand, supra, 80 F.3d at 567-68 ; see also United States v. Medina-Martinez, 396 F.3d 1 , 9-10 (1st Cir.) (failure to give instruction pursuant to Carter v. Kentucky, supra, 450 U.S. 288 , 101 S.Ct. 1112 , not plain error because jury instructions covered presumption of innocence and burden of proof and court was "confident that the evidence ... would have resulted in a guilty verdict irrespective of the instructional error"), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1007 , 125 S.Ct. 1955 , 161 L.Ed.2d 786 (2005). | 1 | 1 |
Altschul v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2016See United States v. Brand, supra, 80 F.3d at 567-68 ; see also United States v. Medina-Martinez, 396 F.3d 1 , 9-10 (1st Cir.) (failure to give instruction pursuant to Carter v. Kentucky, supra, 450 U.S. 288 , 101 S.Ct. 1112 , not plain error because jury instructions covered presumption of innocence and burden of proof and court was "confident that the evidence ... would have resulted in a guilty verdict irrespective of the instructional error"), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1007 , 125 S.Ct. 1955 , 161 L.Ed.2d 786 (2005). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Brandgreen1 sentence2016See United States v. Brand, supra, 80 F.3d at 567-68 ; see also United States v. Medina-Martinez, 396 F.3d 1 , 9-10 (1st Cir.) (failure to give instruction pursuant to Carter v. Kentucky, supra, 450 U.S. 288 , 101 S.Ct. 1112 , not plain error because jury instructions covered presumption of innocence and burden of proof and court was "confident that the evidence ... would have resulted in a guilty verdict irrespective of the instructional error"), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1007 , 125 S.Ct. 1955 , 161 L.Ed.2d 786 (2005). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Medina-Martinezgreen1 sentence2016See United States v. Brand, supra, 80 F.3d at 567-68 ; see also United States v. Medina-Martinez, 396 F.3d 1 , 9-10 (1st Cir.) (failure to give instruction pursuant to Carter v. Kentucky, supra, 450 U.S. 288 , 101 S.Ct. 1112 , not plain error because jury instructions covered presumption of innocence and burden of proof and court was "confident that the evidence ... would have resulted in a guilty verdict irrespective of the instructional error"), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1007 , 125 S.Ct. 1955 , 161 L.Ed.2d 786 (2005). | 1 | 1 |
Carter v. Kentuckygreen2 sentences2016I note that the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has held similarly with respect to whether a trial court's failure to comply with Carter v. Kentucky, supra, 450 U.S. 288 , 101 S.Ct. 1112 , is "plain" error and "affect[ed] substantial rights"; United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725 , 736-37, 113 S.Ct. 1770 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993) ; and has engaged in a harmlessness analysis with respect to whether an unpreserved error of a violation of Carter v. Kentucky, supra, 450 U.S. 288 , 101 S.Ct. 1112 , warranted reversal under the federal plain error rule, rule 52(b) of the Federal R 2016I note that the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has held similarly with respect to whether a trial court's failure to comply with Carter v. Kentucky, supra, 450 U.S. 288 , 101 S.Ct. 1112 , is "plain" error and "affect[ed] substantial rights"; United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725 , 736-37, 113 S.Ct. 1770 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993) ; and has engaged in a harmlessness analysis with respect to whether an unpreserved error of a violation of Carter v. Kentucky, supra, 450 U.S. 288 , 101 S.Ct. 1112 , warranted reversal under the federal plain error rule, rule 52(b) of the Federal R | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Carrasquillogreen | 1 | 1 |
| Levine v. Gallup Sand and Gravel Companygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Duffy v. Vogelgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Ramirezgreen | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Harry Lloyd Davisgreen | 1 | 1 |
| United States v. Evasio Hernandez, A/k/a, Eduardo Gonzalezgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Golding
green
2 sentences2022She further contends that, even if the error is amenable to a harmlessness analysis, the record demonstrates that ‘‘having one attorney represent three children with differing goals’’ was harmful because it ‘‘made it impossible for the trial court to properly determine . . . in the first instance, whether the respondent was unable to achieve a degree of personal rehabilitation as to encourage the belief that she could assume a responsible position in her children’s lives within a reasonable time. [It] also made it impossible for the trial court to properly determine whether it was in the best 2022She further contends that, even if the error is amenable to a harmlessness analysis, the record demonstrates that ‘‘having one attorney represent three children with differing goals’’ was harmful because it ‘‘made it impossible for the trial court to properly determine . . . in the first instance, whether the respondent was unable to achieve a degree of personal rehabilitation as to encourage the belief that she could assume a responsible position in her children’s lives within a reasonable time. [It] also made it impossible for the trial court to properly determine whether it was in the best | 3 | 1993–2022 |
Neder v. United States
green
2 sentences2020In determining whether the threat is a true threat, consider the particular factual context in which the allegations—in which the allegedly threatening conduct occurred, which could include the reaction of the person allegedly being threatened and the defendant’s conduct before and after the alleged threatening conduct.’’ 19 The defendant contends that the harmlessness rule in Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1 , 15-17, 119 S. Ct. 1827 , 144 L. Ed. 2d 35 (1999), guides the analysis in the present case. 2020In determining whether the threat is a true threat, consider the particular factual context in which the allegations—in which the allegedly threatening conduct occurred, which could include the reaction of the person allegedly being threatened and the defendant’s conduct before and after the alleged threatening conduct.’’ 19 The defendant contends that the harmlessness rule in Neder v. United States, 527 U.S. 1 , 15-17, 119 S. Ct. 1827 , 144 L. Ed. 2d 35 (1999), guides the analysis in the present case. | 3 | 2005–2020 |
State v. Shifflett
green
2 sentences2010The harmlessness of an error depends upon its impact on the trier and the result . . . and the test is whether there is a reasonable possibility that the improperly admitted evidence contributed to the conviction.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Shifflett, 199 Conn. 718, 751-52 , 508 A.2d 748 (1986). 2010The harmlessness of an error depends upon its impact on the trier and the result . . . and the test is whether there is a reasonable possibility that the improperly admitted evidence contributed to the conviction.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Shifflett, 199 Conn. 718, 751-52 , 508 A.2d 748 (1986). | 3 | 1989–2010 |
State v. Moscone
green
2 sentences1988The harmlessness of an error depends upon its impact on the trier and the result, not upon whether the particular evidence involved was legally essential to support the finding.” See United States v. Hernandez, 574 F.2d 1362, 1372 (5th Cir. 1978) (error not harmless “[a]lthough there appears to be an ample basis to sustain the conviction”); State v. Moscone, 171 Conn. 500, 508-509 , 370 A.2d 1030 (1976) (Miranda violation was not harmless “despite the abundance of properly admitted evidence which tended to prove the defendant’s guilt”); State v. Dullivan, 10 Conn. App. 474, 479 , 523 A.2d 1353 1988The harmlessness of an error depends upon its impact on the trier and the result, not upon whether the particular evidence involved was legally essential to support the finding.” See United States v. Hernandez, 574 F.2d 1362, 1372 (5th Cir. 1978) (error not harmless “[a]lthough there appears to be an ample basis to sustain the conviction”); State v. Moscone, 171 Conn. 500, 508-509 , 370 A.2d 1030 (1976) (Miranda violation was not harmless “despite the abundance of properly admitted evidence which tended to prove the defendant’s guilt”); State v. Dullivan, 10 Conn. App. 474, 479 , 523 A.2d 1353 | 3 | 1988–1994 |
State v. Hoeplinger
green
2 sentences1992Ed. 2d 340 (1972); State v. Hoeplinger, 206 Conn. 278, 294 , 537 A.2d 1010 (1988). “ ‘The harmlessness of an error depends upon its impact on the trier and the result, not upon whether the particular evidence involved was legally essential to support the finding.’ ” State v. Hoeplinger, supra, 295 . 1992Ed. 2d 340 (1972); State v. Hoeplinger, 206 Conn. 278, 294 , 537 A.2d 1010 (1988). “ ‘The harmlessness of an error depends upon its impact on the trier and the result, not upon whether the particular evidence involved was legally essential to support the finding.’ ” State v. Hoeplinger, supra, 295 . | 3 | 1989–1992 |
Bruno v. Connecticut
green
2 sentences2022The harmlessness of an error depends [on] its impact on the trier and the result’’; State v. Bruno, 197 Conn. 326, 336 , 497 A.2d 758 (1985) (Shea, J., concurring), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1119 , 106 S. Ct. 1635 , 90 L. Ed. 2d 181 (1986); not on whether the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, was sufficient to support an inference of guilt. 2022The harmlessness of an error depends [on] its impact on the trier and the result’’; State v. Bruno, 197 Conn. 326, 336 , 497 A.2d 758 (1985) (Shea, J., concurring), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1119 , 106 S. Ct. 1635 , 90 L. Ed. 2d 181 (1986); not on whether the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, was sufficient to support an inference of guilt. | 2 | 1989–2022 |
State v. Bruno
green
2 sentences2022The harmlessness of an error depends [on] its impact on the trier and the result’’; State v. Bruno, 197 Conn. 326, 336 , 497 A.2d 758 (1985) (Shea, J., concurring), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1119 , 106 S. Ct. 1635 , 90 L. Ed. 2d 181 (1986); not on whether the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, was sufficient to support an inference of guilt. 2022The harmlessness of an error depends [on] its impact on the trier and the result’’; State v. Bruno, 197 Conn. 326, 336 , 497 A.2d 758 (1985) (Shea, J., concurring), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1119 , 106 S. Ct. 1635 , 90 L. Ed. 2d 181 (1986); not on whether the evidence, when viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, was sufficient to support an inference of guilt. | 2 | 1989–2022 |
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences2004State v. Smith, 73 Conn. App. 173, 201 , 807 A.2d 500 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 923 , 812 A.2d 865 (2002). 2004State v. Smith, 73 Conn. App. 173, 201 , 807 A.2d 500 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 923 , 812 A.2d 865 (2002). | 2 | 2003–2004 |
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences2004State v. Smith, 73 Conn. App. 173, 201 , 807 A.2d 500 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 923 , 812 A.2d 865 (2002). 2004State v. Smith, 73 Conn. App. 173, 201 , 807 A.2d 500 , cert. denied, 262 Conn. 923 , 812 A.2d 865 (2002). | 2 | 2003–2004 |
Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.
green
2 sentences2025We agree with the petitioner and conclude that, assuming that the respondent had a constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel at the termination hearing; see In re Jonathan M., supra, 255 Conn. 225 (noting that parent ‘‘is constitutionally entitled to the effective assistance of counsel only if he had a constitutional right to appointed counsel in the termination proceeding’’);11 Cronic’s presumption 11 The parties agree that whether the respondent had a constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel under the fourteenth amendment to the federal constitution depen 2025We agree with the petitioner and conclude that, assuming that the respondent had a constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel at the termination hearing; see In re Jonathan M., supra, 255 Conn. 225 (noting that parent ‘‘is constitutionally entitled to the effective assistance of counsel only if he had a constitutional right to appointed counsel in the termination proceeding’’);11 Cronic’s presumption 11 The parties agree that whether the respondent had a constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel under the fourteenth amendment to the federal constitution depen | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Sanchez v. State
green
2 sentences2021See, e.g., White v. State, 729 So. 2d 909, 915 (Fla. 1999); State v. Thomas, 750 So. 2d 1114, 1126 (La. App. 1999), writ denied, 795 So. 2d 1203 (La. 2001); Sanchez v. State, 272 Or. App. 226 , 241 n.10, 355 P.3d 172 , review denied, 358 Or. 449 , 366 P.3d 719 (2015); Ex parte Fierro, 934 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996), cert. denied sub nom. 2021See, e.g., White v. State, 729 So. 2d 909, 915 (Fla. 1999); State v. Thomas, 750 So. 2d 1114, 1126 (La. App. 1999), writ denied, 795 So. 2d 1203 (La. 2001); Sanchez v. State, 272 Or. App. 226 , 241 n.10, 355 P.3d 172 , review denied, 358 Or. 449 , 366 P.3d 719 (2015); Ex parte Fierro, 934 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996), cert. denied sub nom. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Thomas
neutral
1 sentence2021See, e.g., White v. State, 729 So. 2d 909, 915 (Fla. 1999); State v. Thomas, 750 So. 2d 1114, 1126 (La. App. 1999), writ denied, 795 So. 2d 1203 (La. 2001); Sanchez v. State, 272 Or. App. 226 , 241 n.10, 355 P.3d 172 , review denied, 358 Or. 449 , 366 P.3d 719 (2015); Ex parte Fierro, 934 S.W.2d 370, 372 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996), cert. denied sub nom. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Whitford
green
2 sentences2020See State v. Golding, supra, 239-40. ‘‘[T]he first two [prongs of Golding] involve a determination [as to] whether the claim is reviewable; the second two . . . involve a determination [as to] whether the defendant may prevail.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Whitford, 260 Conn. 610, 621 , 799 A.2d 1034 (2002). 2020See State v. Golding, supra, 239-40. ‘‘[T]he first two [prongs of Golding] involve a determination [as to] whether the claim is reviewable; the second two . . . involve a determination [as to] whether the defendant may prevail.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Whitford, 260 Conn. 610, 621 , 799 A.2d 1034 (2002). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Kotteakos v. United States
green
2 sentences2019E.g., Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 765 , 66 S. Ct. 1239 , 90 L. Ed. 1557 (1946) (‘‘[t]he [harmlessness] inquiry cannot be merely whether there was enough to support the result’’); United States v. Ince, 21 F.3d 576, 583 (4th Cir. 1994) (‘‘more [stringent]’’ harmless error inquiry ‘‘does not ask simply whether we believe that irrespective of the error there was sufficient untainted evidence to convict,’’ but ‘‘whether we believe it highly probable that the error did not affect the judgment’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]). 2019E.g., Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750, 765 , 66 S. Ct. 1239 , 90 L. Ed. 1557 (1946) (‘‘[t]he [harmlessness] inquiry cannot be merely whether there was enough to support the result’’); United States v. Ince, 21 F.3d 576, 583 (4th Cir. 1994) (‘‘more [stringent]’’ harmless error inquiry ‘‘does not ask simply whether we believe that irrespective of the error there was sufficient untainted evidence to convict,’’ but ‘‘whether we believe it highly probable that the error did not affect the judgment’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| United States v. Olano red | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| O'NEAL v. McAninch green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| Schiappa v. Connecticut green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| State v. Schiappa green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Stuart v. Stuart green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| State v. O'Neil green | 1 | 2010–2010 |
| State v. Ramirez green | 1 | 2006–2006 |
| State v. Montgomery green | 1 | 2005–2005 |
| State v. Aleksiewicz green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| Daly v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| State v. Graham green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| State v. Paulino green | 1 | 1996–1996 |
| State v. Johnson green | 1 | 1991–1991 |
| Davis v. United States green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| State v. Silano green | 1 | 1990–1990 |
| Paschall v. United States green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| State v. Dullivan green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Rose v. Clark red | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| People v. Rivers neutral | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.