135 Pennsylvania opinions name it 14 courts 1851–2026 19 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In the Interest of J.B., Appeal of: Commgreen2 sentences2021Further, “a weight of the evidence challenge in a juvenile - 12 - J-S07034-21 matter assumes the evidence was sufficient to adjudicate the juvenile delinquent beyond a reasonable doubt, but asks the juvenile court to reassess its adjudication to determine whether certain facts of record are so weighty that they warrant the grant of a new adjudication hearing.” J.B., supra at 156-57 , 106 A.3d at 95-96 (emphasis added). 2016He further testified that Appellant told him that he and another individual stole the sneakers, but did not provide specific details. 14 In re J.B., 106 A.3d 76, 96 (Pa. 2014); Commonwealth v. Widmer, 744 A.2d 745, 751 (Pa. 2000). 15 ln re J.B., 106 A.3d 76, 96 (Pa. 2014); Commonwealth v. West, 937 A.2d 516, 521 (Pa. Super. 2007). 16 In re R.D., 44 A.3d 657, 664 (Pa. Super. 2012); In re Love, 646 A.2d 1233, 1237 (Pa. Super. 1994). 8 In addition to Jahlil's testimony, his sister, A'Oshanay Scott also testified during the adjudication hearing. | 3 | 3 |
Commonwealth v. Widmergreen2 sentences2024See E.L.W., 273 A.3d at 1205 ; G.E.W., 233 A.3d at 902 ; accord Commonwealth v. Widmer, 744 A.2d 745, 751-52 (Pa. 2000).8 ____________________________________________ 7 O.M.W.’s counsel also failed to ensure that the record contained a transcript of the adjudication hearing. 2016He further testified that Appellant told him that he and another individual stole the sneakers, but did not provide specific details. 14 In re J.B., 106 A.3d 76, 96 (Pa. 2014); Commonwealth v. Widmer, 744 A.2d 745, 751 (Pa. 2000). 15 ln re J.B., 106 A.3d 76, 96 (Pa. 2014); Commonwealth v. West, 937 A.2d 516, 521 (Pa. Super. 2007). 16 In re R.D., 44 A.3d 657, 664 (Pa. Super. 2012); In re Love, 646 A.2d 1233, 1237 (Pa. Super. 1994). 8 In addition to Jahlil's testimony, his sister, A'Oshanay Scott also testified during the adjudication hearing. | 2 | 2 |
In Re Kerrgreen2 sentences2020She further argues that the trial court contributed to the violation of her rights by delaying the adjudication hearing for 30 days.12 The only remedy Mother requests for these alleged violations is vacatur of the dependency order and return of Child to her custody.13 ____________________________________________ 11 Moreover, the remedy for failure to hold the dependency hearing in a timely manner is “the automatic activation of the right of the child and its parents to the immediate release of the child from the state’s custody.” In re Kerr, 481 A.2d 1225, 1226 (Pa. Super. 1984). 2020She further argues that the trial court contributed to the violation of her rights by delaying the adjudication hearing for 30 days.12 The only remedy Mother requests for these alleged violations is vacatur of the dependency order and return of Child to her custody.13 ____________________________________________ 11Moreover, the remedy for failure to hold the dependency hearing in a timely manner is “the automatic activation of the right of the child and its parents to the immediate release of the child from the state’s custody.” In re Kerr, 481 A.2d 1225, 1226 (Pa. Super. 1984). | 2 | 2 |
Mitchell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Boardgreen2 sentences2003See Mitchell v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Steve’s Prince of Steaks), 572 Pa. 380 , 815 A.2d 620 (2003). 2003See Mitchell v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Steve’s Prince of Steaks), 572 Pa. 380 , 815 A.2d 620 (2003). | 2 | 2 |
Slawek v. BD. OF MED. ED. & LICENSUREgreen2 sentences2025If the adjudication is not affirmed, the court may enter any order authorized by 42 Pa.C.S. § 706 (relating to disposition of appeals). 85 As this Court has noted, this standard is “self-explanatory, except, perhaps for the provision that agency action may be reversed in the event that it is ‘not in accordance with law.’” 86 In Slawek, we understood this phrase as an incorporation of preexisting law governing the review of agency decisions, as articulated in decisions such as Blumenschein v. Pittsburgh Housing Authority. 87 Blumenschein made clear that, when reviewing an agency’s discretionary 2025If the adjudication is not affirmed, the court may enter any order authorized by 42 Pa.C.S. § 706 (relating to disposition of appeals). 85 As this Court has noted, this standard is “self-explanatory, except, perhaps for the provision that agency action may be reversed in the event that it is ‘not in accordance with law.’” 86 In Slawek, we understood this phrase as an incorporation of preexisting law governing the review of agency decisions, as articulated in decisions such as Blumenschein v. Pittsburgh Housing Authority. 87 Blumenschein made clear that, when reviewing an agency’s discretionary | 1 | 7 |
Estate of McGovern v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement Boardgreen2 sentences1996McGovern's Estate v. State Employees' Retirement Board, 512 Pa. 377, 382 , 517 A.2d 523, 525 (1986) (emphasis in original), citing 2 Pa.C.S. § 704. 1996McGovern's Estate v. State Employees' Retirement Board, 512 Pa. 377, 382 , 517 A.2d 523, 525 (1986) (emphasis in original), citing 2 Pa.C.S. § 704. | 1 | 3 |
Sparacino v. Zoning Board of Adjustmentgreen2 sentences2024As this Court has explained: “[T]he record before the local agency is full and complete, if ‘there is a complete and accurate record of the testimony taken so that the appellant is given a base upon which he may appeal, and also, that the appellate court is given a sufficient record upon which to rule on questions presented.’” Sparacino v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 728 A.2d 445 , 447 n.4 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1999) (citation omitted). 7 In another case also governed by Section 754, Frey v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of City of Pittsburgh, [ 459 A.2d 917 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1983)], this Court held that the t 2006As this court sits as an intermediate court, it must affirm the board’s decision unless the court finds that (1) the adjudication was in violation of the constitutional rights of the appellant; (2) the adjudication was not in accordance with the law; (3) the board violated the practice and procedure of Commonwealth agencies; or (4) any finding of fact made by the board, and necessary to support its adjudication, was not supported by substantial evidence. 2 Pa.C.S. §754(b); Sparacino v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 728 A.2d 445, 447 (Pa. Commw. 1999) While appellant contends that the board abuse | 1 | 2 |
Tire Jockey Service, Inc. v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2025We must affirm the Board’s order unless we conclude “that the adjudication is in violation of the constitutional rights of the [petitioner], or is not in accordance with law, . . . or that any finding of fact made by the [Board] and necessary to support its adjudication is not supported by substantial evidence . . . .” Tire Jockey Serv. v. Dep’t of Env’t Prot., 915 A.2d 1165, 1185 (Pa. 2007) (quoting 2 Pa.C.S. § 704) (additional quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Sherwoodgreen1 sentence2025See Commonwealth v. Sherwood, 982 A.2d 483, 498 (Pa. 2009) (rejecting argument that prior bad acts evidence should have been excluded because the witness who was the conduit for the evidence “was an unreliable witness” and noting that the argument went to the weight of the evidence and not its admissibility). | 1 | 1 |
| In the Interest of: N.M., A Minorgreen | 1 | 1 |
In the Int. of: E.L.W., a Minorgreen1 sentence2024See E.L.W., 273 A.3d at 1205 ; G.E.W., 233 A.3d at 902 ; accord Commonwealth v. Widmer, 744 A.2d 745, 751-52 (Pa. 2000).8 ____________________________________________ 7 O.M.W.’s counsel also failed to ensure that the record contained a transcript of the adjudication hearing. | 1 | 1 |
| M. Kuziak v. Borough of Danville and Borough of Danville Rental Registration and Property Maintenance Hearing Boardgreen | 1 | 1 |
| In re C.M.T.green | 1 | 1 |
| In Re CBgreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re ADgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Bongiornogreen | 1 | 1 |
| In the Int. of R.E.L., a minorgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Hardygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Allegheny County Housing Authority v. Liddellgreen | 1 | 1 |
| DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Commonwealthgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Karkariagreen | 1 | 1 |
| Henderson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Silver, Marc I. v. Mendel, M. Mark, Individually, Murray, Daniel E., Individually, and M. Mark Mendel, Ltdgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Barasch v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commissiongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Westgreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re RDgreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re Lovegreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re GPRgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Marrerogreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Huntergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Wilsongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Commonwealth v. Donohuegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Korn v. Epsteingreen | 1 | 1 |
| Broadwater v. Sentnergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Nolan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
green
2 sentences2021Nolan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 797 A.2d 1042 , 1045 n.4 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002). 2014Nolan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 797 A.2d 1042 , 1045 n. 4 (Pa.Cmwlth.2002). . 43 P.S. § 753(Z )(2)(B). | 11 | 2003–2021 |
Apple v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEW
green
2 sentences1998Apple v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 126 Pa.Cmwlth. 195 , 559 A.2d 87 (1989). 1998Apple v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 126 Pa.Cmwlth. 195 , 559 A.2d 87 (1989). | 4 | 1993–1998 |
Gabriel v. Trinity Area School District
green
2 sentences1981After hearing, the court shall affirm the adjudication unless it shall find that the adjudication is in violation of the constitutional rights of the appellant, or is not in accordance with law, or that the provisions of Subchapter B of Chapter 5 (relating to practice and procedure of local agencies) have been violated in the proceedings before the agency, or that any finding of fact made by the agency and necessary to support its adjudication is not supported by substantial evidence.” See also, Gabriel v. Trinity Area School District, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 620 , 350 A. 2d 203 (1976). 1981After hearing, the court shall affirm the adjudication unless it shall find that the adjudication is in violation of the constitutional rights of the appellant, or is not in accordance with law, or that the provisions of Subchapter B of Chapter 5 (relating to practice and procedure of local agencies) have been violated in the proceedings before the agency, or that any finding of fact made by the agency and necessary to support its adjudication is not supported by substantial evidence.” See also, Gabriel v. Trinity Area School District, 22 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 620 , 350 A. 2d 203 (1976). | 4 | 1981–1984 |
Drennan v. City of Philadelphia
green
2 sentences1991Drennan v. City of Philadelphia, Board of Pensions and Retirement, 106 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 262, 525 A.2d 1265 (1987). . 1990Drennan v. City of Philadelphia, Board of Pensions and Retirement, 106 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 262, 525 A.2d 1265 (1987). | 3 | 1990–1991 |
Terry v. Ohio
green
2 sentences2019Id. at 76 . ____________________________________________ 4 In addition to the delinquency petition that is the genesis of this appeal, the adjudication hearing addressed a second delinquency petition involving a misdemeanor disorderly conduct charge filed at 879 of 2019. 2019Id. at 76 . ____________________________________________ 4 In addition to the delinquency petition that is the genesis of this appeal, the adjudication hearing addressed a second delinquency petition involving a misdemeanor disorderly conduct charge filed at 879 of 2019. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Kirkwood v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV.
green
2 sentences2017Kirkwood v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 525 A.2d 841 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1987). 11 Claimant contends that the Board capriciously disregarded her evidence in arriving at its decision. 1990In Kirkwood v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 106 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 92, 525 A.2d 841 (1987) this court questioned the applicability of the substantial evidence test when the party with the burden of proof is the only party to present evidence and does not prevail before the agency. | 2 | 1990–2017 |
Yost v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
green
2 sentences2015Yost v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 42 A.3d 1158 , 1161 n. 2 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2012). 3 Claimant purports to raise six questions in her brief. 2015Yost v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 42 A.3d 1158 , 1161 n. 2 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2012). 5 (4) negligence indicating an intentional disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employee’s duties and obligations to the employer. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Meiksin v. Howard Hanna Co., Inc.
green
2 sentences2010In Meiksin, supra, the Superior Court noted, 404 Pa. Super at 420-21 , 590 A.2d at 1305 : “Regarding the liability of an attorney for the wrongful use of civil process, the Superior Court has followed the Restatement (Second) of Torts §674 comment d (1977), where the law is stated as follows: “ ‘An attorney who initiates a civil proceeding on behalf of his client or one who takes any steps in the proceeding is not liable if he has probable cause for his action (see section 675); and even if he has no probable cause and is convinced that his client’s claim is unfounded, he is still not liable i 2010In Meiksin, supra, the Superior Court noted, 404 Pa. Super at 420-21 , 590 A.2d at 1305 : “Regarding the liability of an attorney for the wrongful use of civil process, the Superior Court has followed the Restatement (Second) of Torts §674 comment d (1977), where the law is stated as follows: “ ‘An attorney who initiates a civil proceeding on behalf of his client or one who takes any steps in the proceeding is not liable if he has probable cause for his action (see section 675); and even if he has no probable cause and is convinced that his client’s claim is unfounded, he is still not liable i | 2 | 2000–2010 |
Gentzler v. Atlee
green
2 sentences2008Broadwater v. Sentner, 725 A.2d 779, 784 (Pa. Super. 1999). “ ‘An attorney who initiates a civil proceeding on behalf of his client, even if he has no probable cause and is convinced that his client’s claim is unfounded, is still not liable if he acts primarily for the purpose of aiding his client in obtaining a proper adjudication of his claim.’ Id. (citing Gentzler v. Atlee, 443 Pa. Super. 128 , 135 n.6, 660 A.2d 1378 , 1382 n.6 (1995)). 2008Broadwater v. Sentner, 725 A.2d 779, 784 (Pa. Super. 1999). “ ‘An attorney who initiates a civil proceeding on behalf of his client, even if he has no probable cause and is convinced that his client’s claim is unfounded, is still not liable if he acts primarily for the purpose of aiding his client in obtaining a proper adjudication of his claim.’ Id. (citing Gentzler v. Atlee, 443 Pa. Super. 128 , 135 n.6, 660 A.2d 1378 , 1382 n.6 (1995)). | 2 | 1996–2008 |
Shenango Valley Regional Charter School v. Hermitage School District
green
2 sentences2000Section 704 of the Administrative Agency Law, 2 Pa.C.S. § 704; Shenango Valley Regional Charter School v. Hermitage School District and Sharon City School District, 756 A.2d 1191 (Pa.Cmwlth.2000). 9 . 2000Section 704 of the Administrative Agency Law, 2 Pa.C.S. § 704; Shenango Valley Regional Charter School v. Hermitage School District and Sharon City School District, 756 A.2d 1191 (Pa.Cmwlth.2000.) 12 . | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Com., Com'n on Charitable Org. v. Acorn
neutral
2 sentences1991Commonwealth Court’s standard of review in an appeal from a decision of an administrative agency is limited to determining whether the agency’s adjudication is in violation of the constitutional rights of the appellant, an error of law has been made by the agency, or the agency’s findings of fact are not supported by substantial evidence. 2 Pa.C.S.A. § 704 (Purdon Supp.Pamph.1990); Commonwealth, Commission on Charitable Organizations v. Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, 502 Pa. 1 , 463 A.2d 406 (1983). 1991Commonwealth Court’s standard of review in an appeal from a decision of an administrative agency is limited to determining whether the agency’s adjudication is in violation of the constitutional rights of the appellant, an error of law has been made by the agency, or the agency’s findings of fact are not supported by substantial evidence. 2 Pa.C.S.A. § 704 (Purdon Supp.Pamph.1990); Commonwealth, Commission on Charitable Organizations v. Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, 502 Pa. 1 , 463 A.2d 406 (1983). | 2 | 1991–1994 |
Board of Pensions & Retirement v. Einhorn
green
2 sentences1982Gabriel v. Trinity Area School District, 22 Pa. Commw. 620 , 350 A. 2d 203 (1976); Board of Pensions and Retirement of City of Philadelphia v. Einhorn, 65 Pa. Commw. 144 , 442 A.2d 21 (1982); Porter v. Board of School Directors, 67 Pa. Commw. 147 , 445 A. 2d 1386 (1982); see also Local Agency Law, 2 Pa. C.S.A. §754(b). 1982Gabriel v. Trinity Area School District, 22 Pa. Commw. 620 , 350 A. 2d 203 (1976); Board of Pensions and Retirement of City of Philadelphia v. Einhorn, 65 Pa. Commw. 144 , 442 A.2d 21 (1982); Porter v. Board of School Directors, 67 Pa. Commw. 147 , 445 A. 2d 1386 (1982); see also Local Agency Law, 2 Pa. C.S.A. §754(b). | 2 | 1982–1982 |
Porter v. Board of School Directors
green
2 sentences1982Gabriel v. Trinity Area School District, 22 Pa. Commw. 620 , 350 A. 2d 203 (1976); Board of Pensions and Retirement of City of Philadelphia v. Einhorn, 65 Pa. Commw. 144 , 442 A.2d 21 (1982); Porter v. Board of School Directors, 67 Pa. Commw. 147 , 445 A. 2d 1386 (1982); see also Local Agency Law, 2 Pa. C.S.A. §754(b). 1982Gabriel v. Trinity Area School District, 22 Pa. Commw. 620 , 350 A. 2d 203 (1976); Board of Pensions and Retirement of City of Philadelphia v. Einhorn, 65 Pa. Commw. 144 , 442 A.2d 21 (1982); Porter v. Board of School Directors, 67 Pa. Commw. 147 , 445 A. 2d 1386 (1982); see also Local Agency Law, 2 Pa. C.S.A. §754(b). | 2 | 1982–1982 |
First Nationall Bank v. Dissinger
green
2 sentences1943Bank v. Dissinger, 266 Pa. 349 ; Tasin v. Bastress, 284 Pa. 47 ; Havir's Est., 283 Pa. 292 ), as to all contentions which could properly have been passed upon on the first trial: Hochman v. Mortgage Finance Corp., 289 Pa. 260 ; McGunnegle v. R. 1927Bank v. Dissinger, 266 Pa. 349 ; Tasin v. Bastress, 284 Pa. 47 ; Havir’s Est., 283 Pa. 292 ), as to all contentions which could properly have been passed upon on the first trial: Hochman v. Mortgage Finance Corp., 289 Pa. 260 ; McGunnegle v. R. | 2 | 1927–1943 |
Tasin v. Bastress
green
2 sentences1943Bank v. Dissinger, 266 Pa. 349 ; Tasin v. Bastress, 284 Pa. 47 ; Havir's Est., 283 Pa. 292 ), as to all contentions which could properly have been passed upon on the first trial: Hochman v. Mortgage Finance Corp., 289 Pa. 260 ; McGunnegle v. R. 1927Bank v. Dissinger, 266 Pa. 349 ; Tasin v. Bastress, 284 Pa. 47 ; Havir’s Est., 283 Pa. 292 ), as to all contentions which could properly have been passed upon on the first trial: Hochman v. Mortgage Finance Corp., 289 Pa. 260 ; McGunnegle v. R. | 2 | 1927–1943 |
Havir's Estate
green
2 sentences1943Bank v. Dissinger, 266 Pa. 349 ; Tasin v. Bastress, 284 Pa. 47 ; Havir's Est., 283 Pa. 292 ), as to all contentions which could properly have been passed upon on the first trial: Hochman v. Mortgage Finance Corp., 289 Pa. 260 ; McGunnegle v. R. 1927Bank v. Dissinger, 266 Pa. 349 ; Tasin v. Bastress, 284 Pa. 47 ; Havir’s Est., 283 Pa. 292 ), as to all contentions which could properly have been passed upon on the first trial: Hochman v. Mortgage Finance Corp., 289 Pa. 260 ; McGunnegle v. R. | 2 | 1927–1943 |
Hochman v. Mortgage Finance Corp.
green
2 sentences1943Bank v. Dissinger, 266 Pa. 349 ; Tasin v. Bastress, 284 Pa. 47 ; Havir's Est., 283 Pa. 292 ), as to all contentions which could properly have been passed upon on the first trial: Hochman v. Mortgage Finance Corp., 289 Pa. 260 ; McGunnegle v. R. 1927Bank v. Dissinger, 266 Pa. 349 ; Tasin v. Bastress, 284 Pa. 47 ; Havir’s Est., 283 Pa. 292 ), as to all contentions which could properly have been passed upon on the first trial: Hochman v. Mortgage Finance Corp., 289 Pa. 260 ; McGunnegle v. R. | 2 | 1927–1943 |
Jefferson County Court Appointed Employees Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board
green
1 sentence2026Jefferson County Court Appointed Employees Association v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board, 985 A.2d 697 (Pa. 2009). 8 The PLRB is vested with exclusive original jurisdiction by Section 1301 of the PERA, which provides: The [PLRB] is empowered . . . to prevent any person from engaging in any unfair practice listed in Article XII [(Section 1201)] of this act. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
McCready v. Dep't of Cmty. & Econ. Dev.
green
1 sentence2024I, §10 (“nor shall private property be taken or applied 2 This Court’s standard of review on appeal “requires that we affirm the Board’s adjudication in a quiet title action unless the adjudication is in violation of [Gidumal’s] constitutional rights, or it is not in accordance with law, or if any of the Board’s findings of fact to support its adjudication [are] not supported by substantial evidence.” O’Layer McCready v. Department of Community & Economic Development, 204 A.3d 1009 , 1016 n.4 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2019); see also Beishline v. Department of Environmental Protection, 234 A.3d 878 , 885 n | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| Frey v. Zoning Board of Adjustment green | 1 | 2024–2024 |
In the Int. of: G.E.W., a Minor
green
1 sentence2024See E.L.W., 273 A.3d at 1205 ; G.E.W., 233 A.3d at 902 ; accord Commonwealth v. Widmer, 744 A.2d 745, 751-52 (Pa. 2000).8 ____________________________________________ 7 O.M.W.’s counsel also failed to ensure that the record contained a transcript of the adjudication hearing. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
| Commonwealth v. Kline green | 1 | 2021–2021 |
| PETRINA v. Kelley green | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| In Re WH green | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| Long Run Timber Co., Ltd. P'ship v. Dep't of Conservation & Natural Res. green | 1 | 2019–2019 |
| Brunswick Hotel & Conference Center, LLC v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Goldman v. Breitbart News Network, LLC green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Commonwealth v. Gainer green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| Lachat v. Hinchliffe green | 1 | 2018–2018 |
| In Re RWJ green | 1 | 2017–2017 |
| Northrup v. Pennsylvania Game Commission green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| Commonwealth Ex Rel. Vance v. Beard green | 1 | 2016–2016 |
| Miranda v. Arizona green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| In Re Adoption of D.M.H. green | 1 | 2015–2015 |
| Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Hessou v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Bennett v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Vereb v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| Russo v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
| In the Interest of J.B. green | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.