adjudication claim in Oklahoma

20 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1914–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (12)

Case	Followed	Cited
In Re AMgreen okla · 2000 · cited in 3 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2018–2023 2 sentences 2023In re A.M ., 2000 OK 82 In re Delaney , 1980 OK 140 617 P.2d 886 In re Christina T ., 1979 OK 9 590 P.2d 189 In re A.M ., 2000 OK 82 In re Chad S. , 1978 OK 94 580 P.2d 983 Id. at ¶ 9. ¶27 Section 1-4-601 concerns the effects of a district court's delay; if an adjudication hearing does not occur within the specified time period, certain consequences follow. 2023In re A.M ., 2000 OK 82 In re Delaney , 1980 OK 140 617 P.2d 886 In re Christina T ., 1979 OK 9 590 P.2d 189 In re A.M ., 2000 OK 82 In re Chad S. , 1978 OK 94 580 P.2d 983 Id. at ¶ 9. ¶27 Section 1-4-601 concerns the effects of a district court's delay; if an adjudication hearing does not occur within the specified time period, certain consequences follow.	2	3
Triad Bank, N.A. v. A & A Materials Co.green oklacivapp · 2001 · cited in 2 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007 2 sentences 2007Therefore, the "summary judgment" ruling on the real party in interest issue, of course, did not bring an end to the litigation as a whole nor did it conclude the action or claims brought against Associated that were the subject of its Offer. ¶ 19 In the case of Triad Bank, N.A. v. A & A Materials Co., Inc., 2002 OK CIV APP 3 , 39 P.3d 820 , the COCA, Division III (the same division that reversed the trial court order involved here) basically recognized that an essential element or condition precedent to recovery of attorney fees and costs under § 1101.1(B) was an adjudication of the claim tha 2007Therefore, the "summary judgment" ruling on the real party in interest issue, of course, did not bring an end to the litigation as a whole nor did it conclude the action or claims brought against Associated that were the subject of its Offer. ¶ 19 In the case of Triad Bank, N.A. v. A & A Materials Co., Inc., 2002 OK CIV APP 3 , 39 P.3d 820 , the COCA, Division III (the same division that reversed the trial court order involved here) basically recognized that an essential element or condition precedent to recovery of attorney fees and costs under § 1101.1(B) was an adjudication of the claim tha	2	2
David S. v. State, Department of Health & Social Servicesgreen alaska · 2012 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 1 sentence 2013In a parental rights termination proceeding, one state court has concluded "(there is no support in ICWA for an attempt to graft § 1915's placement preferences onto § 1912." David S. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, 270 P.3d 767, 780 (Alaska 2012). 157 Even if we exclude the subject placement from our review of State's active efforts in this foster care placement, the record evidence in this proceeding supports State has met its burden of clear and convincing evidence under the facts of this proceeding.	1	1
Bookout v. Great Plains Regional Medical Centergreen okla · 1997 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012Ctr., 1997 OK 38, ¶ 10 , 939 P.2d 1131, 1134 (footnote omitted). ¶ 18 The adjudication hearing was held August 4, 2011. 2012Ctr., 1997 OK 38, ¶ 10 , 939 P.2d 1131, 1134 (footnote omitted). ¶ 18 The adjudication hearing was held August 4, 2011.	1	1
Pospisil's Casegreen mass · 1988 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010See, e.g., Truckstops of America, Inc. v. Engram, 220 Ga.App. 289 , 469 S.E.2d 425, 427-428 (1996) 1 ; Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc., 189 Mich.App. 298 , 472 N.W.2d 60, 63-64 (1991) 2 ; Kinninger v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of State of Colo., 759 P.2d 766, 767-768 (Colo.App.1988) 3 ; Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or.App. 200 , 752 P.2d 312, 314-315 (1988) 4 ; Pospisil's Case, 402 Mass. 820 , 525 N.E.2d 646, 647-648 (1988) 5 ; Hengemuhle v. Long Proirie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54, 58 (Minn.1984) 6 . 2010See, e.g., Truckstops of America, Inc. v. Engram, 220 Ga.App. 289 , 469 S.E.2d 425, 427-428 (1996) 1 ; Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc., 189 Mich.App. 298 , 472 N.W.2d 60, 63-64 (1991) 2 ; Kinninger v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of State of Colo., 759 P.2d 766, 767-768 (Colo.App.1988) 3 ; Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or.App. 200 , 752 P.2d 312, 314-315 (1988) 4 ; Pospisil's Case, 402 Mass. 820 , 525 N.E.2d 646, 647-648 (1988) 5 ; Hengemuhle v. Long Proirie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54, 58 (Minn.1984) 6 .	1	1
Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie Jayceesgreen minn · 1984 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 1 sentence 2010See, e.g., Truckstops of America, Inc. v. Engram, 220 Ga.App. 289 , 469 S.E.2d 425, 427-428 (1996) 1 ; Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc., 189 Mich.App. 298 , 472 N.W.2d 60, 63-64 (1991) 2 ; Kinninger v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of State of Colo., 759 P.2d 766, 767-768 (Colo.App.1988) 3 ; Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or.App. 200 , 752 P.2d 312, 314-315 (1988) 4 ; Pospisil's Case, 402 Mass. 820 , 525 N.E.2d 646, 647-648 (1988) 5 ; Hengemuhle v. Long Proirie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54, 58 (Minn.1984) 6 .	1	1
Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Incgreen michctapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010See, e.g., Truckstops of America, Inc. v. Engram, 220 Ga.App. 289 , 469 S.E.2d 425, 427-428 (1996) 1 ; Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc., 189 Mich.App. 298 , 472 N.W.2d 60, 63-64 (1991) 2 ; Kinninger v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of State of Colo., 759 P.2d 766, 767-768 (Colo.App.1988) 3 ; Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or.App. 200 , 752 P.2d 312, 314-315 (1988) 4 ; Pospisil's Case, 402 Mass. 820 , 525 N.E.2d 646, 647-648 (1988) 5 ; Hengemuhle v. Long Proirie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54, 58 (Minn.1984) 6 . 2010See, e.g., Truckstops of America, Inc. v. Engram, 220 Ga.App. 289 , 469 S.E.2d 425, 427-428 (1996) 1 ; Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc., 189 Mich.App. 298 , 472 N.W.2d 60, 63-64 (1991) 2 ; Kinninger v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of State of Colo., 759 P.2d 766, 767-768 (Colo.App.1988) 3 ; Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or.App. 200 , 752 P.2d 312, 314-315 (1988) 4 ; Pospisil's Case, 402 Mass. 820 , 525 N.E.2d 646, 647-648 (1988) 5 ; Hengemuhle v. Long Proirie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54, 58 (Minn.1984) 6 .	1	1
Kinninger v. Industrial Claim Appeals Officegreen coloctapp · 1988 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 1 sentence 2010See, e.g., Truckstops of America, Inc. v. Engram, 220 Ga.App. 289 , 469 S.E.2d 425, 427-428 (1996) 1 ; Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc., 189 Mich.App. 298 , 472 N.W.2d 60, 63-64 (1991) 2 ; Kinninger v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of State of Colo., 759 P.2d 766, 767-768 (Colo.App.1988) 3 ; Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or.App. 200 , 752 P.2d 312, 314-315 (1988) 4 ; Pospisil's Case, 402 Mass. 820 , 525 N.E.2d 646, 647-648 (1988) 5 ; Hengemuhle v. Long Proirie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54, 58 (Minn.1984) 6 .	1	1
Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.green orctapp · 1988 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010See, e.g., Truckstops of America, Inc. v. Engram, 220 Ga.App. 289 , 469 S.E.2d 425, 427-428 (1996) 1 ; Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc., 189 Mich.App. 298 , 472 N.W.2d 60, 63-64 (1991) 2 ; Kinninger v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of State of Colo., 759 P.2d 766, 767-768 (Colo.App.1988) 3 ; Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or.App. 200 , 752 P.2d 312, 314-315 (1988) 4 ; Pospisil's Case, 402 Mass. 820 , 525 N.E.2d 646, 647-648 (1988) 5 ; Hengemuhle v. Long Proirie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54, 58 (Minn.1984) 6 . 2010See, e.g., Truckstops of America, Inc. v. Engram, 220 Ga.App. 289 , 469 S.E.2d 425, 427-428 (1996) 1 ; Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc., 189 Mich.App. 298 , 472 N.W.2d 60, 63-64 (1991) 2 ; Kinninger v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of State of Colo., 759 P.2d 766, 767-768 (Colo.App.1988) 3 ; Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or.App. 200 , 752 P.2d 312, 314-315 (1988) 4 ; Pospisil's Case, 402 Mass. 820 , 525 N.E.2d 646, 647-648 (1988) 5 ; Hengemuhle v. Long Proirie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54, 58 (Minn.1984) 6 .	1	1
TruckStops of America, Inc. v. Engramgreen gactapp · 1996 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010 2 sentences 2010See, e.g., Truckstops of America, Inc. v. Engram, 220 Ga.App. 289 , 469 S.E.2d 425, 427-428 (1996) 1 ; Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc., 189 Mich.App. 298 , 472 N.W.2d 60, 63-64 (1991) 2 ; Kinninger v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of State of Colo., 759 P.2d 766, 767-768 (Colo.App.1988) 3 ; Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or.App. 200 , 752 P.2d 312, 314-315 (1988) 4 ; Pospisil's Case, 402 Mass. 820 , 525 N.E.2d 646, 647-648 (1988) 5 ; Hengemuhle v. Long Proirie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54, 58 (Minn.1984) 6 . 2010See, e.g., Truckstops of America, Inc. v. Engram, 220 Ga.App. 289 , 469 S.E.2d 425, 427-428 (1996) 1 ; Farrington v. Total Petroleum, Inc., 189 Mich.App. 298 , 472 N.W.2d 60, 63-64 (1991) 2 ; Kinninger v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of State of Colo., 759 P.2d 766, 767-768 (Colo.App.1988) 3 ; Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or.App. 200 , 752 P.2d 312, 314-315 (1988) 4 ; Pospisil's Case, 402 Mass. 820 , 525 N.E.2d 646, 647-648 (1988) 5 ; Hengemuhle v. Long Proirie Jaycees, 358 N.W.2d 54, 58 (Minn.1984) 6 .	1	1
Grand River Dam Authority v. Stategreen okla · 1982 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987 2 sentences 1987See 75 O.S.Supp. 1985 § 301(2) and (6) for definitions of "rule" and "order"; see also Grand River Dam Authority v. State, 645 P.2d 1011, 1019 (Okl. 1982). [19] The sufficiency of the government's case cannot ordinarily be tested by a declaratory judgment in advance of prosecution. 1987See 75 O.S.Supp.1985 § 301(2) and (6) for definitions of "rule” and "order"; see also Grand River Dam Authority v. State, 645 P.2d 1011, 1019 (Okl.1982). .	1	1
Matter of Paulgreen okla · 1976 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977 2 sentences 1977See, In Matter of Paul et al., Okl., 555 P.2d 603 (1976). 1977See, In Matter of Paul et al., Okl., 555 P.2d 603 (1976).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (23)

Case	Cited	Years
Santosky v. Kramer green scotus · 1982 2 sentences 2018In re S.B.C. , 2002 OK 83 , ¶ 5, 64 P.3d 1080 , 1082 citing Santosky v. Kramer , 455 U.S. 745 , 753, 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982). 2018In re S.B.C. , 2002 OK 83 , ¶ 5, 64 P.3d 1080 , 1082 citing Santosky v. Kramer , 455 U.S. 745 , 753, 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982).	2	2018–2018
In Re SBC green okla · 2002 2 sentences 2018In re S.B.C. , 2002 OK 83 , ¶ 5, 64 P.3d 1080 , 1082 citing Santosky v. Kramer , 455 U.S. 745 , 753, 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982). 2018In re S.B.C. , 2002 OK 83 , ¶ 5, 64 P.3d 1080 , 1082 citing Santosky v. Kramer , 455 U.S. 745 , 753, 102 S.Ct. 1388 , 71 L.Ed.2d 599 (1982).	2	2018–2018
In Re KC green oklacivapp · 2002 2 sentences 2018Id. ¶8 In determining whether there was a constitutional deprivation of due process, we review the timing of the trial court's adjudication hearing de novo . 2018Id. ¶ 8 In determining whether there was a constitutional deprivation of due process, we review the timing of the trial court's adjudication hearing de novo .	2	2018–2018
Matter of As green oklacivapp · 1991 2 sentences 1993“Court supervision over the custody and welfare of children is equitable in nature, and the findings and judgment of the trial court will not be set aside unless clearly against the weight of the evidence.” In the Matter of A.S., 811 P.2d 910 (Okla.App.1991). 1993"Court supervision over the custody and welfare of children is equitable in nature, and the findings and judgment of the trial court will not be set aside unless clearly against the weight of the evidence." In the Matter of A.S., 811 P.2d 910 (Okla.	2	1993–1993
Matter of Delaney green okla · 1980 1 sentence 2023In re A.M ., 2000 OK 82 In re Delaney , 1980 OK 140 617 P.2d 886 In re Christina T ., 1979 OK 9 590 P.2d 189 In re A.M ., 2000 OK 82 In re Chad S. , 1978 OK 94 580 P.2d 983 Id. at ¶ 9. ¶27 Section 1-4-601 concerns the effects of a district court's delay; if an adjudication hearing does not occur within the specified time period, certain consequences follow.	1	2023–2023
Matter of Christina T. green okla · 1979 2 sentences 2023In re A.M ., 2000 OK 82 In re Delaney , 1980 OK 140 617 P.2d 886 In re Christina T ., 1979 OK 9 590 P.2d 189 In re A.M ., 2000 OK 82 In re Chad S. , 1978 OK 94 580 P.2d 983 Id. at ¶ 9. ¶27 Section 1-4-601 concerns the effects of a district court's delay; if an adjudication hearing does not occur within the specified time period, certain consequences follow. 2023In re A.M ., 2000 OK 82 In re Delaney , 1980 OK 140 617 P.2d 886 In re Christina T ., 1979 OK 9 590 P.2d 189 In re A.M ., 2000 OK 82 In re Chad S. , 1978 OK 94 580 P.2d 983 Id. at ¶ 9. ¶27 Section 1-4-601 concerns the effects of a district court's delay; if an adjudication hearing does not occur within the specified time period, certain consequences follow.	1	2023–2023
Matter of Chad S. green okla · 1978 2 sentences 2023In re A.M ., 2000 OK 82 In re Delaney , 1980 OK 140 617 P.2d 886 In re Christina T ., 1979 OK 9 590 P.2d 189 In re A.M ., 2000 OK 82 In re Chad S. , 1978 OK 94 580 P.2d 983 Id. at ¶ 9. ¶27 Section 1-4-601 concerns the effects of a district court's delay; if an adjudication hearing does not occur within the specified time period, certain consequences follow. 2023In re A.M ., 2000 OK 82 In re Delaney , 1980 OK 140 617 P.2d 886 In re Christina T ., 1979 OK 9 590 P.2d 189 In re A.M ., 2000 OK 82 In re Chad S. , 1978 OK 94 580 P.2d 983 Id. at ¶ 9. ¶27 Section 1-4-601 concerns the effects of a district court's delay; if an adjudication hearing does not occur within the specified time period, certain consequences follow.	1	2023–2023
Lane v. State green okla · 1981 1 sentence 2018Although the child also has constitutional rights, see In re T.H.L. , 1981 OK 103 , ¶ 13, 636 P.2d 330 , none of these cases suggests that the parental liberty interest at stake presumptively belongs to one parent alone. ¶ 15 A proceeding to adjudicate a child as deprived clearly threatens each parent's interest by threatening to disrupt each parent's relationship with her or his child. *1222 Depending on the reasons leading to the adjudication hearing and its outcome, the proceeding may result not only in making a child a ward of the court but also in removing a child from its parent's custod	1	2018–2018
In Re THL green okla · 1981 1 sentence 2018Although the child also has constitutional rights, see In re T.H.L. , 1981 OK 103 , ¶ 13, 636 P.2d 330 , none of these cases suggests that the parental liberty interest at stake presumptively belongs to one parent alone. ¶ 15 A proceeding to adjudicate a child as deprived clearly threatens each parent's interest by threatening to disrupt each parent's relationship with her or his child. *1222 Depending on the reasons leading to the adjudication hearing and its outcome, the proceeding may result not only in making a child a ward of the court but also in removing a child from its parent's custod	1	2018–2018
Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band of Potawatomi Tribe of Okla. green scotus · 1991 2 sentences 2009Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe, 498 U.S. 505 , 111 S.Ct. 905 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1991). [2] 67 Stat. 588 (1953)(wherein Congress consented to state assumption of jurisdiction over civil causes of action arising in Indian country between Indians or to which Indians are parties, codified at 25 U.S.C. § 1322 ). 2009Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian Tribe, 498 U.S. 505 , 111 S.Ct. 905 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1112 (1991). [2] 67 Stat. 588 (1953)(wherein Congress consented to state assumption of jurisdiction over civil causes of action arising in Indian country between Indians or to which Indians are parties, codified at 25 U.S.C. § 1322 ).	1	2009–2009
Lewis v. Sac & Fox Tribe of Oklahoma Housing Authority green okla · 1994 2 sentences 2009Upon remand, the adjudication of the claim will proceed in the trial court. [1] Lewis v. Sax and Fox Tribe, 1994 OK 20 , 896 P.2d 503 ; Okla. 2009Upon remand, the adjudication of the claim will proceed in the trial court. [1] Lewis v. Sax and Fox Tribe, 1994 OK 20 , 896 P.2d 503 ; Okla.	1	2009–2009
Carpenter v. Douglas Aircraft Company green okla · 1966 1 sentence 1979This case is clearly distinguishable from Carpenter v. Douglas Aircraft Co., Okl., 420 P.2d 911 (1966) in which we specifically remanded for further proceedings.	1	1979–1979
Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn green scotus · 1975 2 sentences 1976It is argued by petitioner that this case is similar to Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469, 491 , 95 S.Ct. 1029, 1047 , 43 L.Ed.2d 328 (1975) which held a state may not impose sanctions on the accurate publication of the name of a rape victim obtained from public records, and that there is nothing that proscribes the press from reporting events that transpire in the courtroom. 15 Petitioner argues that the adjudication hearing was held in open court and therefore what transpired at the hearing and the name and photograph of the juvenile may be published under the Cox rationale. 1976It is argued by petitioner that this case is similar to Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. Cohn, 420 U.S. 469, 491 , 95 S.Ct. 1029, 1047 , 43 L.Ed.2d 328 (1975) which held a state may not impose sanctions on the accurate publication of the name of a rape victim obtained from public records, and that there is nothing that proscribes the press from reporting events that transpire in the courtroom. 15 Petitioner argues that the adjudication hearing was held in open court and therefore what transpired at the hearing and the name and photograph of the juvenile may be published under the Cox rationale.	1	1976–1976
M. Grau e Hijos v. District Court of Aguadilla neutral prsupreme · 1930 1 sentence 1935In re Kruger’s Estate, 123 Cal. 391 , 55 P. 1056 : “The compensation of the attorney of the executor, while not a claim against the estate, is an expense of administration, allowed to the executor, the amount of which is to be fixed by the court and paid out of the estate (In re Levinson’s Estate, 108 Cal. 450 , 41 P. 483 , and 42 P. 479 ); but such an order for the payment of money, by which the property of the heirs, legatees, and devisees is to be taken from them, cannot be made without notice and an opportunity to them to be heard.	1	1935–1935
In re Estate of Levinson green cal · 1895 1 sentence 1935In re Kruger’s Estate, 123 Cal. 391 , 55 P. 1056 : “The compensation of the attorney of the executor, while not a claim against the estate, is an expense of administration, allowed to the executor, the amount of which is to be fixed by the court and paid out of the estate (In re Levinson’s Estate, 108 Cal. 450 , 41 P. 483 , and 42 P. 479 ); but such an order for the payment of money, by which the property of the heirs, legatees, and devisees is to be taken from them, cannot be made without notice and an opportunity to them to be heard.	1	1935–1935
People v. James neutral cal · 1895 1 sentence 1935In re Kruger’s Estate, 123 Cal. 391 , 55 P. 1056 : “The compensation of the attorney of the executor, while not a claim against the estate, is an expense of administration, allowed to the executor, the amount of which is to be fixed by the court and paid out of the estate (In re Levinson’s Estate, 108 Cal. 450 , 41 P. 483 , and 42 P. 479 ); but such an order for the payment of money, by which the property of the heirs, legatees, and devisees is to be taken from them, cannot be made without notice and an opportunity to them to be heard.	1	1935–1935
In re Estate of Kruger neutral cal · 1899 2 sentences 1935In re Kruger’s Estate, 123 Cal. 391 , 55 P. 1056 : “The compensation of the attorney of the executor, while not a claim against the estate, is an expense of administration, allowed to the executor, the amount of which is to be fixed by the court and paid out of the estate (In re Levinson’s Estate, 108 Cal. 450 , 41 P. 483 , and 42 P. 479 ); but such an order for the payment of money, by which the property of the heirs, legatees, and devisees is to be taken from them, cannot be made without notice and an opportunity to them to be heard. 1935In re Kruger’s Estate, 123 Cal. 391 , 55 P. 1056 : “The compensation of the attorney of the executor, while not a claim against the estate, is an expense of administration, allowed to the executor, the amount of which is to be fixed by the court and paid out of the estate (In re Levinson’s Estate, 108 Cal. 450 , 41 P. 483 , and 42 P. 479 ); but such an order for the payment of money, by which the property of the heirs, legatees, and devisees is to be taken from them, cannot be made without notice and an opportunity to them to be heard.	1	1935–1935
Ratcliff-Sanders Grocer Co. v. Bluejacket Mercantile Co. neutral okla · 1917	1	1932–1932
Fullerton v. State Ex Rel. Com'rs of Land Office neutral okla · 1929 2 sentences 1932Co., 63 Okla. 298 , 164 P. 1142 , Fullerton v. State ex rel., 140 Okla. 122 , 282 P. 674 , and other decisions of this court. 1932Co., 63 Okla. 298 , 164 P. 1142 , Fullerton v. State ex rel., 140 Okla. 122 , 282 P. 674 , and other decisions of this court.	1	1932–1932
Friend v. Talcott green · 1931	1	1929–1929
Talcott v. Friend green ca7 · 1909	1	1929–1929
Friend v. Talcott green scotus · 1913	1	1929–1929
Elmore, Quillian & Co. v. Henderson-M. Merc. Co. neutral ala · 1912	1	1914–1914

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 10A, § 1-4-601 (5) OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1101 (3) OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 10A, § 1-1-102 (3) OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 10A, § 1-1-105 (3) OK § Okla. Stat. tit. 10A, § 1-4-207 (3) USC § 25u.s.c.1911 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 377 (1911–2026) CA 175 (1893–2026) IL 138 (1896–2026) PA 135 (1851–2026) NE 90 (1897–2025) OH 81 (1923–2026) LA 76 (1976–2025) NC 61 (1906–2026) NY 56 (1886–2026) AZ 56 (1968–2026) AR 53 (1925–2024) MI 47 (1938–2025) UT 42 (1983–2025) MO 41 (1872–2025) KY 34 (1964–2026) GA 34 (1923–2023) CT 32 (1988–2024) OR 28 (1892–2024) KS 25 (1898–2026) MT 24 (1986–2025) ME 23 (1979–2026) IA 21 (1890–2023) OK 20 (1914–2023) MS 19 (1935–2023) IN 16 (1886–2016) WA 16 (1898–2021) AK 11 (2000–2023) NM 11 (1900–2023) RI 11 (1994–2020) TN 10 (1948–2026) WV 10 (1901–2026) FL 10 (1968–2025) SD 9 (1942–1993) MN 9 (1917–2015) VA 8 (1913–2018) NJ 7 (1957–2024) MA 7 (1938–2022) MD 7 (1978–2020) HI 7 (1986–2009) AL 7 (2002–2024) DC 5 (1990–2010) CO 5 (2007–2025) ND 4 (1994–2021) DE 4 (1959–2019) WY 2 (2018–2021) NV 2 (2016–2017) VT 2 (1980–2005) ID 2 (2014–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check