Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1917–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Commodore Hotel Fire & Explosion Casegreen1 sentence2008In re Commodore Hotel Fire & Explosion Case, 318 N.W.2d 244, 246-47 (Minn.1982). | 1 | 1 |
Campbell v. Glenwood Hills Hospitals, Inc.green2 sentences1985Campbell v. Glenwood, Hills Hospitals, Inc., 273 Minn. 525, 531 , 142 N.W.2d 255, 259 (1966). 1985Campbell v. Glenwood, Hills Hospitals, Inc., 273 Minn. 525, 531 , 142 N.W.2d 255, 259 (1966). | 1 | 1 |
Larson v. Slettegreen1 sentence1976The fact of the adjudication, the other necessary conditions existing, makes the adjudication a bar by judgment, or an estoppel by verdict, and not its correctness or the propriety of the method used in reaching the result.” Clay, Robinson & Co. v. Larson, 125 Minn. 271, 273 , 146 N. W. 1095, 1096 (1914). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Jrm
green
1 sentence2015Finally, both the assistant principal and liaison officer testified that appellant admitted to smoking marijuana. 6 653 N.W.2d at 210–11. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In Re Stevenson
green
2 sentences1978The Supreme Court of Montana citing Breed decided in In re Stevenson, 167 Mont. 220 , 538 P.2d 5 (1975), that juvenile transfer hearings are not adjudicatory hearings within the meaning of constitutional requirements. 1978The Supreme Court of Montana citing Breed decided in In re Stevenson, 167 Mont. 220 , 538 P.2d 5 (1975), that juvenile transfer hearings are not adjudicatory hearings within the meaning of constitutional requirements. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
People in Interest of LVA
green
2 sentences1978A., S.D., 248 N.W.2d 864 (1976), Breed was held to be inapplicable to the transfer under the South Dakota statute because the transfer hearing was held before the adjudication hearing. 1978A., S.D., 248 N.W.2d 864 (1976), Breed was held to be inapplicable to the transfer under the South Dakota statute because the transfer hearing was held before the adjudication hearing. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Clay, Robinson & Co. v. Larson
green
1 sentence1976The fact of the adjudication, the other necessary conditions existing, makes the adjudication a bar by judgment, or an estoppel by verdict, and not its correctness or the propriety of the method used in reaching the result.” Clay, Robinson & Co. v. Larson, 125 Minn. 271, 273 , 146 N. W. 1095, 1096 (1914). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Buick v. Boyd
green
2 sentences1952And though the decree provides that the ‘property be awarded in accordance with said agreement’ it is not such an adjudication as to bar a subsequent action to reform the contract.” In Buick v. Boyd, 37 Cal. App. 508, 509 , 174 P. 913 , cited in support of the above text, the facts are almost identical with those now before us. 1952And though the decree provides that the ‘property be awarded in accordance with said agreement’ it is not such an adjudication as to bar a subsequent action to reform the contract.” In Buick v. Boyd, 37 Cal. App. 508, 509 , 174 P. 913 , cited in support of the above text, the facts are almost identical with those now before us. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Truesdale v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
green
2 sentences1949Co. 67 Minn. 454, 460 , 70 N. W. 568, 570 , 64 A. S. R. 430, where we said: “* * * In so far as the trust estate was concerned, it is apparent that this was a final adjudication of the claim for attorney’s fees, and that the proceeding as conducted and concluded was a tar to a distinct and independent action to recover additional compensation for the same services(Italics supplied.) The issue of res judicata was not litigated before the trial court and is raised for the first time on appeal. 1949Co. 67 Minn. 454, 460 , 70 N. W. 568, 570 , 64 A. S. R. 430, where we said: “* * * In so far as the trust estate was concerned, it is apparent that this was a final adjudication of the claim for attorney’s fees, and that the proceeding as conducted and concluded was a tar to a distinct and independent action to recover additional compensation for the same services(Italics supplied.) The issue of res judicata was not litigated before the trial court and is raised for the first time on appeal. | 1 | 1949–1949 |
Baxter v. Chute
green
2 sentences1939Baxter v. Chute, 50 Minn. 164 , 52 N. W. 379 , 36 A. S. R. 633. 1939Baxter v. Chute, 50 Minn. 164 , 52 N. W. 379 , 36 A. S. R. 633. | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Atwood Lumber Co. v. Watkins
neutral
2 sentences1917Atwood Lumber Co. v. Watkins, 94 Minn. 464 , 103 N. W. 332 ; Stuelpnagel v. Paper, Calmenson & Co. 111 Minn. 3 , 126 N. W. 281 . 1917Atwood Lumber Co. v. Watkins, 94 Minn. 464 , 103 N. W. 332 ; Stuelpnagel v. Paper, Calmenson & Co. 111 Minn. 3 , 126 N. W. 281 . | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Stuelpnagel v. Paper, Calmenson & Co.
neutral
2 sentences1917Atwood Lumber Co. v. Watkins, 94 Minn. 464 , 103 N. W. 332 ; Stuelpnagel v. Paper, Calmenson & Co. 111 Minn. 3 , 126 N. W. 281 . 1917Atwood Lumber Co. v. Watkins, 94 Minn. 464 , 103 N. W. 332 ; Stuelpnagel v. Paper, Calmenson & Co. 111 Minn. 3 , 126 N. W. 281 . | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.