7 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1957–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Krusegreen2 sentences1988We can not square the imposition of a parole ineligibility term for violation of probation in this case with the standard in State v. Kruse, 105 N.J. 354, 361-362 (1987). 1988We can not square the imposition of a parole ineligibility term for violation of probation in this case with the standard in State *281 v. Kruse, 105 N.J. 354, 361-362 (1987). | 2 | 2 |
Westhoff v. Kerr SS Co., Inc.green1 sentence2017Co., 219 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wilsongreen1 sentence1989They are circumstances to support the adjudication of a violation. [State v. Smith, 226 N.J.Super. 276, 280 (App.Div.1988), certif. denied, — N.J.-(1989); State v. Wilson, 226 N.J.Super. 271, 276 (App.Div.1988), certif. denied, — N.J. — (1989).] In the present case, defendant’s probation violations—illegal drug use and failure to report to his probation officer—are neither aggravating factors nor evidence of those factors. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Smithgreen1 sentence1989They are circumstances to support the adjudication of a violation. [State v. Smith, 226 N.J.Super. 276, 280 (App.Div.1988), certif. denied, — N.J.-(1989); State v. Wilson, 226 N.J.Super. 271, 276 (App.Div.1988), certif. denied, — N.J. — (1989).] In the present case, defendant’s probation violations—illegal drug use and failure to report to his probation officer—are neither aggravating factors nor evidence of those factors. | 1 | 1 |
Gluck v. Rynda Development Co.green1 sentence1957While the maintenance of the status quo and the preservation of the res is often essential to effective judicial procedure, Gluck v. Rynda Development Co., 99 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McMahon v. Caravan Refrigerated Cargo, Inc.green2 sentences2002But see McMahon v. Caravan Refrigerated Cargo, 406 Pa.Super. 303 , 594 A.2d 349 (Pa.Sup.Ct. 1991), alloc. denied, 529 Pa. 621 , 600 A.2d 538 (1991) (holding that the plaintiff-claimant was not required to obtain a final adjudication of his claim against another guaranty association before recovering from PPCIGA). 2002But see McMahon v. Caravan Refrigerated Cargo, 406 Pa.Super. 303 , 594 A.2d 349 (Pa.Sup.Ct. 1991), alloc. denied, 529 Pa. 621 , 600 A.2d 538 (1991) (holding that the plaintiff-claimant was not required to obtain a final adjudication of his claim against another guaranty association before recovering from PPCIGA). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McKelvey v. Pierce
green
1 sentence2024Under McKelvey, a court must analyze each element of a challenged tort claim and determine whether the court’s adjudication of that claim would require it to “choose between competing religious visions, or cause interference with a church’s administrative prerogatives, including its core right to select, and govern the duties of, its ministers.” Ibid. (internal quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.