known rule (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

known rule in Florida

20 Florida opinions name it 3 courts 1920–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

CaseFollowedCited
Canakaris v. Canakarisgreen
fla · 1980 · cited in 4 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1987–2016
2 sentences

2016The appellate court in reviewing such a situation is correcting an erroneous application of a known rule of law.” (quoting Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1202 (Fla.1980))); Vaughn v. State, 711 So.2d 64, 66 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

2010The appellate court in reviewing such a situation is correcting an erroneous application of a known rule of law.” Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1202 (Fla.1980) (emphasis added).

44
State v. Berniegreen
fladistctapp · 1985 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1986–2008
2 sentences

2008State v. Bernie, 472 So.2d 1243, 1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

1986In State v. Bernie, 472 So.2d 1243 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985), the court stated: In strictly construing section 933.18, as we must, [footnote omitted] we find that the requirements of this section are clear — (a) a present or known violation of a narcotics law must exist in the home to be searched prior to the issuance of the warrant for the search of that home, and (b) this fact must be alleged in the supporting affidavit.

12
Vaughn v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 1998 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016The appellate court in reviewing such a situation is correcting an erroneous application of a known rule of law.” (quoting Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197, 1202 (Fla.1980))); Vaughn v. State, 711 So.2d 64, 66 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).

11
Martin-Johnson, Inc. v. Savagegreen
fla · 1987 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
1 sentence

2004In Martin-Johnson v. Savage, 509 So.2d 1097, 1099 (Fla.1987), the court made clear that a non-final order for which no appeal is provided by rule is reviewable by certiorari only in extremely limited circumstances.

11
Martinez v. General Ins. Co.green
fladistctapp · 1986 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987
1 sentence

1987See Martinez v. General Insurance Co., 483 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Pina v. General Insurance Co., 443 So.2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

11
O'Loughlin v. Como Oil Co.green
fladistctapp · 1983 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
1 sentence

1983See, e.g., O’Loughlin v. Como Oil Co., Inc., 434 So.2d 367 (Fla. 4th DCA, 1983) and Louisville and Nashville Railroad Co. When the employer’s negligent conduct involves also — as here — a known violation of the law, surely it cannot be said that the combined effect of both the employee’s and employer’s actions was such that no reasonable person could differ as to the propriety of the action taken by the trial court.

11
Crews v. Crewsgreen
fla · 1938 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 1960–1960
2 sentences

1960See Crews v. Crews, 130 Fla. 499 , 178 So. 139, 141 .

1960See Crews v. Crews, 130 Fla. 499 , 178 So. 139, 141 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (13)

CaseCitedYears
Bradford v. Stoutamire green
fla · 1948
2 sentences

1976As the Florida Supreme Court stated in Bradford v. Stoutamire, 38 So.2d 684 , 685 (Fla. 1949), "[i]t is a well known rule that fee statutes are to be strictly construed and none allowed except where clearly provided by law." Accord: State v. Fussell, 24 So.2d 804 (Fla. 1946).

1975And, as the Florida Supreme Court has stated, "[i]t is a well known rule that fee statutes are to be strictly construed and none allowed except where clearly provided by law." (Emphasis supplied.) Bradford v. Stoutamire, 38 So.2d 684 , 685 (Fla. 1949).

31975–1976
Hutchinson v. Shayne neutral
fla · 1946
2 sentences

1976As the Florida Supreme Court stated in Bradford v. Stoutamire, 38 So.2d 684 , 685 (Fla. 1949), "[i]t is a well known rule that fee statutes are to be strictly construed and none allowed except where clearly provided by law." Accord: State v. Fussell, 24 So.2d 804 (Fla. 1946).

1975In Bradford v. Stoutamire, 38 So.2d 684 , 685 (Fla. 1949), the Florida Supreme Court stated: "It is a well known rule that fee statutes are to be strictly construed and none allowed except where clearly provided by law." Accord: State v. Fussell, 24 So.2d 804 , 806 (Fla. 1946).

21975–1976
Medina v. State green
fla · 1985
1 sentence

1994Medina v. State, 466 So.2d 1046 , 1049-1050 (Fla.1985).

11994–1994
State v. Law green
fla · 1989
1 sentence

1992Under the well known standard of State v. Law, 559 So.2d 187 (Fla.1989) — if the state fails to adduce evidence that is inconsistent with the defendant’s hypothesis of innocence, the motion must be granted — we conclude that there is circumstantial evidence of guilt that the jury could have believed to convict.

11992–1992
FLA. SHERIFFS YOUTH FUND v. Dept. of Labor and Employment SEC. green
fladistctapp · 1983
1 sentence

1989In Sheriffs Youth Fund v. Department of Labor, 436 So.2d 332 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983), claimant and her husband were hired to work as "group" parents, and it was a condition of the employment that group parents be a married couple.

11989–1989
Pina v. General Insurance Co. neutral
fladistctapp · 1984
1 sentence

1987See Martinez v. General Insurance Co., 483 So.2d 892 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Pina v. General Insurance Co., 443 So.2d 395 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984).

11987–1987
Walker & LaBerge, Inc. v. Halligan green
fla · 1977
1 sentence

1981However, retroactive application is permitted in a limited few cases where the "nature of the statutes involved was inherently procedural or affected only the measure of damages for vindication of a substantive right." 344 So.2d at 243 .

11981–1981
Sanford v. Rubin green
fla · 1970
1 sentence

1979Fundamental error has been defined as error which goes to the foundation of the case or goes to the merits of the cause of action. ( Sanford v. Rubin, 237 So.2d 134 (Fla. 1970)) We are of the view that that doctrine is applicable sub judice. (c.f.

11979–1979
Rawls v. State Ex Rel. Nolan green
fla · 1929
1 sentence

1975And, in the often quoted case of Rawls v. State, 122 So. 222 (Fla. 1929), the court emphasized that "[p]ublic officers have no claim for official services rendered, except when, and to the extent that, compensation is provided by law, and when no compensation is so provided, the rendition of such services is deemed to be gratuitous." Accord: State ex rel.

11975–1975
State v. Washoe Co. Commrs. green
nev · 1896
2 sentences

1932In this connection the court said: “It is of course fundamental that his rights cannot be determined unless he is brought into court. ’ ’ There was a similar holding in State v. Washoe County, 23 Nev. 247 , 45 Pac. 529 , in which ease *389 it was said: “It is a well known principle that no man’s rights can be concluded by a judgment unless he is a party to the action and has been given his day in court.” In Woodbridge Twp. v. Allen, 43 N. J.

1932In this connection the court said: “It is of course fundamental that his rights cannot be determined unless he is brought into court. ’ ’ There was a similar holding in State v. Washoe County, 23 Nev. 247 , 45 Pac. 529 , in which ease *389 it was said: “It is a well known principle that no man’s rights can be concluded by a judgment unless he is a party to the action and has been given his day in court.” In Woodbridge Twp. v. Allen, 43 N. J.

11932–1932
Black v. Brinkley green
ark · 1891
1 sentence

1932Law, 262, the court said: ‘ ‘ The owner of the title depending on the proceedings which are under review in the certiorari is made a party to the writ, that he may be heard in a suit affecting his interest and be concluded by the record.” See also Black v. Twp. of Brinkley, 54 Ark. 372 , 15 S. W. 1030 .

11932–1932
Railway Co. v. Lear green
ark · 1891
1 sentence

1932Law, 262, the court said: ‘ ‘ The owner of the title depending on the proceedings which are under review in the certiorari is made a party to the writ, that he may be heard in a suit affecting his interest and be concluded by the record.” See also Black v. Twp. of Brinkley, 54 Ark. 372 , 15 S. W. 1030 .

11932–1932
Hobbs v. Illinois Central Railroad neutral
iowa · 1915
1 sentence

1920The case of Hobbs v. Illinois Central Railroad Company, 171 Iowa 624 , 152 N. W.

11920–1920

Where else courts name it

IL 57 (1878–2026) PA 46 (1836–2025) KY 44 (1912–2024) MO 43 (1885–2024) IN 43 (1857–2020) CA 42 (1911–2022) TX 41 (1893–2025) AL 39 (1837–1998) NY 38 (1846–2023) WV 32 (1894–2024) IA 23 (1866–2025) TN 22 (1900–2021) WA 22 (1889–2021) MA 21 (1841–2014) CT 21 (1904–2022) OR 21 (1923–2022) GA 20 (1895–2016) FL 20 (1920–2016) LA 18 (1843–2012) AR 16 (1910–2002) NJ 16 (1913–2019) ID 16 (1926–2019) CO 15 (1909–2019) MD 14 (1903–2025) MS 14 (1940–2019) OH 11 (1895–2019) MN 11 (1918–2025) NC 11 (1903–2008) VA 10 (1896–2008) MI 9 (1975–2022) WY 9 (1928–2014) AZ 8 (1924–2000) WI 8 (1912–2020) KS 7 (1922–2020) ME 7 (1845–2019) OK 6 (1905–1996) VT 5 (1919–2016) DE 4 (1995–2020) SC 4 (1938–2026) RI 4 (2000–2022) MT 3 (1944–2008) UT 3 (2003–2025) DC 3 (1984–2021) AK 2 (2019–2019) NE 2 (1957–2025) NM 2 (1940–1967) PR 2 (1936–1967) HI 2 (1921–2008)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check