announced principle in Louisiana

1935In Meyer v. Bichow, supra, decided in 1913, the rule which in the other cases was applied to delays allowed in the course of judicial proceedings was declared applicable also to a case involving the question of peremption, thus: “Where one has IS days in which to file a lien and serve an attested account, and the last day on which he can do it falls on a Sunday, he may file it on the first succeeding day which is not a dies non.” In Bernadas v. Miller, 13 La.

1935In Meyer v. Bichow, supra, decided in 1913, the rule which in the other cases was applied to delays allowed in the course of judicial proceedings was declared applicable also to a case involving the question of peremption, thus: “Where one has 15 days in which to file a lien and serve an attested account, and *423 the last day on which he can do it falls on a Sunday, he may file it on the first succeeding day which is not a dies non.” In Bernadas v. Miller, 13 La.

2017Melinie v. State, 93-1380 (La. 1/12/96), 665 So.2d 1172 and La.Code Crim.P. art. 930.3.

2017However, in State v. Hebreard , 98-385, p. 2 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/25/98), 708 So.2d 1291 , 1292, the court announced that a challenge to a habitual offender proceeding is not a proper ground for post-conviction relief, citing State ex rel.

1994Specifically, the court announced the test for statutes that restrict visual depictions of sexual conduct by children below a certain age: A trier of fact need not find that the material appeals to the prurient interest of the average person; it is not required that sexual conduct portrayed be done so in a patently offensive manner; and the material at issue need not be considered as a whole. 458 U.S. at 764 , 102 S.Ct. at 3358 .

1994Specifically, the court announced the test for statutes that restrict visual depictions of sexual conduct by children below a certain age: A trier of fact need not find that the material appeals to the prurient interest of the average person; it is not required that sexual conduct portrayed be done so in a patently offensive manner; and the material at issue need not be considered as a whole. 458 U.S. at 764 , 102 S.Ct. at 3358 .

1991More than five decades ago in Fridge v. Talbert, 180 La. 937 , 158 So. 209 (1934), this Court announced the principle: Where witnesses differ, the courts should reconcile, if possible, the apparent contradictions their testimony presents.

1991More than five decades ago in Fridge v. Talbert, 180 La. 937 , 158 So. 209 (1934), this Court announced the principle: Where witnesses differ, the courts should reconcile, if possible, the apparent contradictions their testimony presents.

1974Unless there be some fault, light as it may be, liability does not arise. * * *" 106 La. 368 , 30 So. 901 .

1968Finding .9 of an acre encompassed within the boundaries of the permanent servitude, the trial court awarded defendant the sum of $900.00, saying: "The Court concludes that there is little difference between the value of a right-of-way in a case of this kind and the land acquired in it, and consequently the Court will place full value on the said right-of-way." Though the author of this generality can find comfort in the pronouncement of Chief Justice O'Neill to the effect that there is not much difference between the value of the right-of-way or servitude and the land embraced in it (Texas Pip

1968Finding .9 of an acre encompassed within the boundaries of the permanent servitude, the trial court awarded defendant the sum of $900.00, saying: "The Court concludes that there is little difference between the value of a right-of-way in a case of this kind and the land acquired in it, and consequently the Court will place full value on the said right-of-way." Though the author of this generality can find comfort in the pronouncement of Chief Justice O'Neill to the effect that there is not much difference between the value of the right-of-way or servitude and the land embraced in it (Texas Pip

1968See Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Babineaux, La.App. 3 Cir., 1963, 154 So.2d 594 ; Texas Gas Transmission Corp. v. Broussard, La.App. 3 Cir., 1967, 196 So.2d 620 .

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1956The following decisions are authoritative and informative upon the announced principle: Franz v. Sun Indemnity Company of New York, La.App.1942, 7 So.2d 636 and Richardson v. Crescent Forwarding & Transportation Company, Ltd., 1931, 17 La.App. 428 , 135 So. 688 ; Haddad v. Commercial Motor Truck Company, 1920, 146 La. 897 , 84 So. 197 , 9 A.L.R. 1380 ; State v. Lanasa, 1922, 151 La. 706 , 92 So. 306 ; Holland v. Continental Casualty Company, La.App. 1934, 155 So. 63 ; Crews v. Levitan Smart Shops, Inc., La.App.1937, 171 So. 608 ; Pierre v. Farm Development Corporation, La.App. 1949, 39 So.2d 1

1945We said however, in course of the opinion, to-wit: "In all of these cases the court emphasized the oft made statement that no hard and fast rule could be laid down to govern cases of the kind; that each case must be determined solely from its own peculiar facts." The facts of the case of Webb v. Dunn et al., 15 So.2d 129 , decided by this court, are to a substantial extent similar to those of the present case.

1944"The case of Lambert v. Murray, 52 Colo. 156 , 120 P. 415 , [419] is directly in point.

1942Krousel v. Thieme, 13 La.App. 680 , 128 So. 670 ; Cado v. Many, La.App., 180 So. 185 ; Duffy v. Hickey, 151 La. 274 , 91 So. 733 .

1942Krousel v. Thieme, 13 La.App. 680 , 128 So. 670 ; Cado v. Many, La.App., 180 So. 185 ; Duffy v. Hickey, 151 La. 274 , 91 So. 733 .

1942Krousel v. Thieme, 13 La.App. 680 , 128 So. 670 ; Cado v. Many, La.App., 180 So. 185 ; Duffy v. Hickey, 151 La. 274 , 91 So. 733 .

1942Krousel v. Thieme, 13 La.App. 680 , 128 So. 670 ; Cado v. Many, La.App., 180 So. 185 ; Duffy v. Hickey, 151 La. 274 , 91 So. 733 .

1942Krousel v. Thieme, 13 La.App. 680 , 128 So. 670 ; Cado v. Many, La.App., 180 So. 185 ; Duffy v. Hickey, 151 La. 274 , 91 So. 733 .

1941In Harrell v. Harrell, 174 La. 957 , 142 So. 138, 140 , this Court, citing a number of authorities, said: “It is well settled that: ‘The presumption “omnia rite” applies to tax sales after parties have slept on their rights for many years.’ ” In that case this Court also quoted approvingly from Griffing v. Taft, 151 La. 442 , 91 So. 832 , as follows: “Moreover, it is immaterial (for the purposes of prescription under article 233 of the Constitution of 1898) whether the assessment has been made in the name of one person, or another, or in no name, or whether the owner, not in possession, has be

1941In Harrell v. Harrell, 174 La. 957 , 142 So. 138, 140 , this Court, citing a number of authorities, said: “It is well settled that: ‘The presumption “omnia rite” applies to tax sales after parties have slept on their rights for many years.’ ” In that case this Court also quoted approvingly from Griffing v. Taft, 151 La. 442 , 91 So. 832 , as follows: “Moreover, it is immaterial (for the purposes of prescription under article 233 of the Constitution of 1898) whether the assessment has been made in the name of one person, or another, or in no name, or whether the owner, not in possession, has be

1941In the discharge of that duty, however, it is not encumbent on said carrier to show how and why the passenger was injured." The announced doctrine is similarly stated in previous jurisprudence of this state, including the cases of Cusimano v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., 170 La. 95 , 127 So. 376 , and Wallace v. Shreveport Railways Company, La.App., 175 So. 86 .

1941Thus he may attack a statute which authorizes the expenditure of public funds, or prescribes the legislative procedure for the enactment of appropriations, or exempts persons or property from taxation, or imposes on him in its enforcement an additional financial burden, however slight.” [8] In Hall v. Blan, State Treasurer, 227 Ala. 64 , 148 So. 601, 607 , the Court announced the rule in the following words: “A taxpayer may maintain a suit to enjoin the state treasurer from diverting public funds, or disbursing same for unlawful purposes.

1941Thus he may attack a statute which authorizes the expenditure of public funds, or prescribes the legislative procedure for the enactment of appropriations, or exempts persons or property from taxation, or imposes on him in its enforcement an additional financial burden, however slight.” [8] In Hall v. Blan, State Treasurer, 227 Ala. 64 , 148 So. 601, 607 , the Court announced the rule in the following words: “A taxpayer may maintain a suit to enjoin the state treasurer from diverting public funds, or disbursing same for unlawful purposes.