17 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rider v. Fontenotgreen2 sentences2015As this court previously noted in Rider v. Fontenot, 463 So.2d 951, 956 (La.App. 3 Cir.1985), cited with approval in Patterson v. State, 95-1668 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/11/96) , 685 So.2d 473 , writs denied, 97-27, 97-108 (La.2/21/97), 688 So.2d 513 : ■ The policy behind the requirement that affirmative defenses be raised in answer is sensible and laudable. 2008As this court previously noted in Rider v. Fontenot, 463 So.2d 951, 956 (La.App. 3 Cir.1985), cited with approval in Patterson v. State, 95-1668 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/11/96) , 685 So.2d 473 , units denied, 97-27, 97-108 (La.2/21/97), 688 So.2d 513 : The policy behind the requirement that affirmative defenses be raised in answer is sensible and laudable. | 3 | 4 |
Jacobs v. O'Bannongreen1 sentence2004Id; see also Jacobs v. O’Bannon, 472 So.2d 180 (La.App. 4 Cir.1985), and 531 So.2d 562 (La.App. 4 Cir.1988). | 1 | 1 |
Jacobs v. O'BANNONgreen1 sentence2004Id; see also Jacobs v. O’Bannon, 472 So.2d 180 (La.App. 4 Cir.1985), and 531 So.2d 562 (La.App. 4 Cir.1988). | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Dufrenegreen1 sentence1998In Johnson v. Dufrene , this Court identified the important considerations that bear on the determination of course and scope: "[W]hether the vehicle was being used in such a manner as to benefit the employer; whether the employee was subject to the employer's control at the time of the accident; whether the employee's use of the vehicle was authorized by the employer; and whether the employee's motive arose from personal objectives or, instead, from his employer's concerns." 433 So.2d at 1112 (emphasis in the original; citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hibernia Nat. Bank v. Orleans Regional Hosp., LLC
green
2 sentences2015As this court previously noted in Rider v. Fontenot, 463 So.2d 951, 956 (La.App. 3 Cir.1985), cited with approval in Patterson v. State, 95-1668 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/11/96) , 685 So.2d 473 , writs denied, 97-27, 97-108 (La.2/21/97), 688 So.2d 513 : ■ The policy behind the requirement that affirmative defenses be raised in answer is sensible and laudable. 2008As this court previously noted in Rider v. Fontenot, 463 So.2d 951, 956 (La.App. 3 Cir.1985), cited with approval in Patterson v. State, 95-1668 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/11/96) , 685 So.2d 473 , units denied, 97-27, 97-108 (La.2/21/97), 688 So.2d 513 : The policy behind the requirement that affirmative defenses be raised in answer is sensible and laudable. | 2 | 2008–2015 |
Patterson v. State
neutral
2 sentences2015As this court previously noted in Rider v. Fontenot, 463 So.2d 951, 956 (La.App. 3 Cir.1985), cited with approval in Patterson v. State, 95-1668 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/11/96) , 685 So.2d 473 , writs denied, 97-27, 97-108 (La.2/21/97), 688 So.2d 513 : ■ The policy behind the requirement that affirmative defenses be raised in answer is sensible and laudable. 2008As this court previously noted in Rider v. Fontenot, 463 So.2d 951, 956 (La.App. 3 Cir.1985), cited with approval in Patterson v. State, 95-1668 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/11/96) , 685 So.2d 473 , units denied, 97-27, 97-108 (La.2/21/97), 688 So.2d 513 : The policy behind the requirement that affirmative defenses be raised in answer is sensible and laudable. | 2 | 2008–2015 |
Borel v. Young
green
2 sentences2011Id. " Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632, 39-2635, p. 14 (La.7/6/10), 45 So.3d 991, 1014 . 2010Id. | 2 | 2010–2011 |
Montalvo v. Sondes
green
2 sentences2001Montalvo, supra . 1998Montalvo, supra . | 2 | 1998–2001 |
Lees v. Smith
green
1 sentence2025Lees, 363 So. 2d at 978 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Marrogi v. Howard
green
1 sentence2014The court found that an important policy behind the immunity was “so that witnesses, bound by their oaths to tell the truth, may speak freely without fear of civil suits for damages” provided that the “testimony given by a non-party witness in a judicial proceeding ... is pertinent and material to the issue.” Id. at 1124-1125 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Halcomb v. Halcomb
green
2 sentences2012Halcomb, supra. The policy behind this rule is that the law does not want to encourage those owing spousal support to engage in “self-help” by unilaterally relieving themselves of the obligation to comply. 2012Id. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc.
green
2 sentences2011Id.” Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632, 39-2635, p. 14 (La.7/6/10), 45 So.3d 991, 1014 . 2011Id. " Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc., 09-2632, 39-2635, p. 14 (La.7/6/10), 45 So.3d 991, 1014 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State Ex Rel. TLR v. RWT
green
2 sentences2000(Effective Feb. 1, 1999.) The policy behind the rule, acknowledging the special needs of children, has application to all courts. 98-2274, at p. 13, 737 So.2d at 695 . 2000The case was remanded for determination of support, with instructions that it be heard "on an expedited basis with preference and priority.” Id. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
NSQ ASSOCIATES v. Beychok
green
1 sentence1996Such a result would have a deleterious effect on the FDIC's ability to protect the insured depositors of the insolvent banks. [Citations omitted.] 659 So.2d at 733-734 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Broussard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence1990Broussard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 188 So.2d 111 (La.App. 3d Cir. 1966). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Davis
green
1 sentence1982State v. Davis, supra. In this instance we feel that strict adherence to the formal rules governing authentication of documents would serve no useful purpose. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.