12 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Davisgreen2 sentences2014“The policy behind the rule is to make sure that the „quest for [the privileged information] is not merely a desperate grasping at a straw.‟” State v. Davis, 186 S.W.3d 367, 372 (Mo. App. W.D. 2005) (quoting State ex rel. 2014“The policy behind the rule is to make sure that the ‘quest for [the privileged information] is not merely a desperate grasping at a straw.’ ” Davis, 186 S.W.3d at 372 (quoting State ex rel. | 1 | 3 |
State ex rel. St. Louis County v. Blockgreen1 sentence2005St Louis County, Mo. v. Block, 622 S.W.2d 367, 372 (Mo.App.E.D.1981) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Leritz v. Koehrgreen1 sentence2001Leritz v. Koehr, 844 S.W.2d 583, 584 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Sherrill v. Wilsongreen1 sentence1995See also, Sherrill, 653 S.W.2d 661 . 2 The policy behind the doctrine’s application considers that an officer should not have the fear of personal liability clouding his judgment when making decisions affecting the safety and welfare of the public. | 1 | 1 |
Baker Ex Rel. Baker v. Bakergreen2 sentences1972It has been observed that preservation of the parent’s right to discipline his minor children has been the basic policy behind the rule of parental immunity from tort liability.” In Baker v. Baker, 364 Mo. 453, 458 , 263 S.W.2d 29, 32 (1953), an unemancipated minor sued her father for damages for *402 injuries received when he backed his automobile out of the driveway at the home and struck her, and this Court said: “In no case cited and reviewed has a court held that an unemanicipated minor child may recover in a tort action against its parents where the action is based on mere negligence. 1972It has been observed that preservation of the parent’s right to discipline his minor children has been the basic policy behind the rule of parental immunity from tort liability.” In Baker v. Baker, 364 Mo. 453, 458 , 263 S.W.2d 29, 32 (1953), an unemancipated minor sued her father for damages for *402 injuries received when he backed his automobile out of the driveway at the home and struck her, and this Court said: “In no case cited and reviewed has a court held that an unemanicipated minor child may recover in a tort action against its parents where the action is based on mere negligence. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Duckett v. Troester
green
1 sentence2000Id. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Aleotti v. Whitaker Bros. Business MacHines, Inc.
green
1 sentence1999According to Aleotti , the policy behind such a rule is to promote vigilance by the landlord in overseeing the property, and to prevent tenants from carrying the burden of protecting the legal integrity of the property. 427 A.2d at 922-923 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Green v. Denison
green
1 sentence1995Green, 738 S.W.2d at 865 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Hewlett v. George
red
1 sentence1994Parental immunity is a judicially-created doctrine first enunciated in the United States by the Mississippi Supreme Court in Hewelett v. George, 68 Miss. 703 , 9 So. 885 (1891). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Tibbetts v. Tibbetts
green
2 sentences1985The policy behind this rule was recognized to be that "if the marital unit was deprived of a proportionate share of the value of improvements added with marital funds, an incentive exists for a sophisticated spouse to divert marital funds for the improvement of separate property." Id. 1985The policy behind this rule was recognized to be that “if the marital unit was deprived of a proportionate share of the value of improvements added with marital funds, an incentive exists for a sophisticated spouse to divert marital funds for the improvement of separate property.” Id. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Artophone Corporation v. Coale
green
2 sentences1982Because the terms "source of income" and "sales which are transactions" are ambiguous this Court has been hard pressed to find therefrom what clearly appears to be "within the purview and intendment of the taxing statute." Artophone Corp. v. Coale, 133 S.W.2d at 347 . 1982Because the terms “source of income” and “sales which are transactions” are ambiguous this Court has been hard pressed to find therefrom what clearly appears to be “within the purview and intendment of the taxing statute.” Artophone Corp. v. Coale, 133 S.W.2d at 347 . | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.