17 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1906–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Goodegreen2 sentences2023The trial court set the case for trial in March 2018, and counsel for Estes did not object to that setting. 9 As in Jones, we find “a more comprehensive analysis of each factor would be superfluous and unnecessary under our plain error review, in that [Estes] has failed to satisfy his burden of proving that ‘prejudicial error resulted’ and said error ‘amounted to manifest injustice.’” Jones, 530 S.W.3d at 534 (quoting State v. Goode, 721 S.W.2d 766, 770 (Mo.App. 1986)). 2017Thus, a more comprehensive analysis of each factor would be superfluous and unnecessary under our plain error review, in that Defendant has failed to satisfy his burden of proving that “prejudicial error resulted” and said error “amounted to manifest injustice.” State v. Goode, 721 S.W.2d 766, 770 (Mo. App. E.D. 1986). | 2 | 2 |
Greenbriar Hills Country Club v. Director of Revenuegreen1 sentence2021Similarly, DMH maintains it was substantially justified based on Director Hillyer’s determination that Hollinger did not meet the qualifications to provide PBS/PCSC services.9 The burden is on DMH to show substantial justification. 9 C.S.R. 45–2.020 (2012); see also Greenbriar Hills Country Club v. Dir. of Revenue, 47 S.W.3d 346, 354 (Mo. banc 2001). | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Kinnegreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hribernik v. Reorganized School District R-3
green
2 sentences1958We said in Hribernik v. Reorganized School District, supra, that the requirements of the rule reveal the Supreme Court’s solicitude for the constitutionality of Section 507.070 by requiring that the elements of due process be accorded to all absent members whom others would bind as a class. 1958We said in Hribernik v. Reorganized School District, supra, that the requirements of the rule reveal the Supreme Court's solicitude for the constitutionality of Section 507.070 by requiring that the elements of due process be accorded to all absent members whom others would bind as a class. | 2 | 1958–1958 |
State v. Jones
green
1 sentence2023The trial court set the case for trial in March 2018, and counsel for Estes did not object to that setting. 9 As in Jones, we find “a more comprehensive analysis of each factor would be superfluous and unnecessary under our plain error review, in that [Estes] has failed to satisfy his burden of proving that ‘prejudicial error resulted’ and said error ‘amounted to manifest injustice.’” Jones, 530 S.W.3d at 534 (quoting State v. Goode, 721 S.W.2d 766, 770 (Mo.App. 1986)). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Rowan County v. Sloas
green
1 sentence2019Thus, witness immunity exists in appropriate circumstances but it is only immunity from damages liability, as reflected in these cases and not the more comprehensive immunity "from the burdens of defending the action ..." discussed in Prater, 292 S.W.3d at 886 (citing Rowan County v. Sloas, 201 S.W.3d at 474 ). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Breathitt County Board of Education v. Prater
green
1 sentence2019Thus, witness immunity exists in appropriate circumstances but it is only immunity from damages liability, as reflected in these cases and not the more comprehensive immunity "from the burdens of defending the action ..." discussed in Prater, 292 S.W.3d at 886 (citing Rowan County v. Sloas, 201 S.W.3d at 474 ). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Alice G. Kelly Norman P. Kelly v. Great Seneca Financial Corp. Javitch, Block & Rathbone
green
1 sentence2019Notably, in Kelly v. Great Seneca Financial Corp., 447 F.3d 944 (6th Cir. 2006), the Sixth Circuit considered the common law doctrine of absolute witness immunity in the context of an attempted collateral order interlocutory appeal. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Arizona v. United States
green
1 sentence2013Arizona made clear that IRCA provides a comprehensive framework for combating the employment of illegal aliens. 132 S.Ct. at 2505 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Wilhite v. Hurd
green
1 sentence1995The criteria for industrial disability discussed in Shipp and the numerous cases discussed therein are expressly acknowledged in most of the cases to have been derived from the Missouri Supreme Court’s opinion in Wilhite v. Hurd, 411 S.W.2d 72 (Mo.1967). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
In Re Adoption of K. L. G.
green
1 sentence1993Id. at 621-22 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Lawson
green
1 sentence1985State v. Lawson, 630 S.W.2d 185 (Mo.App.1982). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Bartolon
green
2 sentences1979Also see, State v. McCauley, 8 Or.App. 571 , 494 P.2d 438 (1972); State v. Bartolon, 8 Or.App. 538 , 495 P.2d 772 (1972). 8 . 1979Also see, State v. McCauley, 8 Or.App. 571 , 494 P.2d 438 (1972); State v. Bartolon, 8 Or.App. 538 , 495 P.2d 772 (1972). 8 . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
People v. Schindler
green
2 sentences1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
| Alcala v. State green | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State v. Duke
green
2 sentences1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State v. McCauley
green
2 sentences1979Also see, State v. McCauley, 8 Or.App. 571 , 494 P.2d 438 (1972); State v. Bartolon, 8 Or.App. 538 , 495 P.2d 772 (1972). 8 . 1979Also see, State v. McCauley, 8 Or.App. 571 , 494 P.2d 438 (1972); State v. Bartolon, 8 Or.App. 538 , 495 P.2d 772 (1972). 8 . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State v. Wright
green
2 sentences1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
People v. Perry
green
2 sentences1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Sallee v. State
green
1 sentence1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Carnes v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
| State v. Sanders green | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State v. Jones
green
1 sentence1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State v. Phipps
green
2 sentences1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State v. Radabaugh
green
2 sentences1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
| People v. White green | 1 | 1979–1979 |
| Texas v. White green | 1 | 1979–1979 |
| State v. Ball green | 1 | 1979–1979 |
| State v. Goodrich green | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Hildreth v. Key
green
1 sentence1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State v. Wauneka
green
1 sentence1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Underwood v. Rouse
green
1 sentence1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Worley v. Budget Credit, Inc.
green
1 sentence1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Allen v. Cardwell
green
1 sentence1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Cartrade, Inc. v. Ford Dealers Advertising Ass'n of Southern California
green
1 sentence1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
State v. Patriarca
green
2 sentences1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Commonwealth v. Borodine
green
2 sentences1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 1979State v. Jones, 558 S.W.2d 286 (Mo.App.1977); State v. Sanders, 533 S.W.2d 632 (Mo.App.1976) and State v. Ball, 529 S.W.2d 901 (Mo.App.1975). 6 .For a comprehensive analysis of this important aspect see Hildreth, supra, n. 1 . 7 .People v. Schindler, 273 Cal.App.2d 624 , 78 Cal.Rptr. 633 (1969); State v. Wauneka, 560 P.2d 1377 (Utah 1977); People v. White, 401 Mich. 482 , 257 N.W.2d 912 (1977); Sallee v. State, 544 P.2d 902 (Okl.Cr.1975); State v. Goodrich, 97 Idaho 472 , 546 P.2d 1180 (1976); State v. Radabaugh, 93 Idaho 727 , 471 P.2d 582 (1970); State v. Patriarca, 112 R.I. 14 , 308 A.2d 30 | 1 | 1979–1979 |
| State v. Frazier green | 1 | 1978–1978 |
| State v. Clancy green | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| Valley v. People green | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| Dixon v. General Grocery Company green | 1 | 1957–1957 |
| Young v. Waters-Pierce Oil Co. green | 1 | 1906–1906 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.