Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
19 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1953–2025 11 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Title, Ballot Title, Etc., No. 64green1 sentence2021Similarly, "an initiative will not be deemed to violate the single subject requirement merely because it spells out details relating to its implementation." In re 2019-2020 #315 , ¶ 15 . ¶15 "The [permissible] breadth of [an] initiative's objective, however, is not without limits." Id. at ¶ 16 . " [W] here an initiative advances separate and distinct purposes, ‘the fact that both purposes relate to a broad concept or subject is insufficient to satisfy the single subject requirement.’ " In re 2009-2010 #91 , 235 P.3d at 1076 ( alteration omitted ) ( quoting In re Title, Ballot Title & Submissio | 1 | 1 |
In the Matter of Title, Submission Clause for 2009-2010 91green2 sentences2021And " [a] n initiative proposing a comprehensive framework contains a single subject if all of its provisions relate directly to its single subject." In re 2009-2010 #91 , 235 P.3d at 1076 . 2021Similarly, "an initiative will not be deemed to violate the single subject requirement merely because it spells out details relating to its implementation." In re 2019-2020 #315 , ¶ 15 . ¶15 "The [permissible] breadth of [an] initiative's objective, however, is not without limits." Id. at ¶ 16 . " [W] here an initiative advances separate and distinct purposes, ‘the fact that both purposes relate to a broad concept or subject is insufficient to satisfy the single subject requirement.’ " In re 2009-2010 #91 , 235 P.3d at 1076 ( alteration omitted ) ( quoting In re Title, Ballot Title & Submissio | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Giordanogreen2 sentences2010See Giordano, 416 U.S. at 512-23 , 94 S.Ct. 1820 , for a comprehensive analysis of the history of Title III and its requirement that wiretap applications be authorized by a senior, publicly accountable official. 2010See Giordano, 416 U.S. at 512-23 , 94 S.Ct. 1820 , for a comprehensive analysis of the history of Title III and its requirement that wiretap applications be authorized by a senior, publicly accountable official. | 1 | 1 |
Pallas v. Johnsongreen2 sentences2009See Pallas v. Johnson, 100 Colo. 449, 452 , 68 P.2d 559, 560 (1937) (stating that factors for determining responsibility include "pecuniary ability ... judgment and skill, and the ability to promptly and satisfactorily carry on and complete the contract"); see also McNichols v. City & County of Denver, 130 Colo. 202, 209-10 , 274 P.2d 317, 321 (1954) (applying Pallas) Broadmoor, LLC. v. Ernest N. Morial New Orleans Exhibition Hall Auth., 867 So.2d 651, 656 (La.2004) ("In determining bidder responsibility, the public entity may look to financial ability, skill, integrity, business judgment, exp 2009See Pallas v. Johnson, 100 Colo. 449, 452 , 68 P.2d 559, 560 (1937) (stating that factors for determining responsibility include "pecuniary ability ... judgment and skill, and the ability to promptly and satisfactorily carry on and complete the contract"); see also McNichols v. City & County of Denver, 130 Colo. 202, 209-10 , 274 P.2d 317, 321 (1954) (applying Pallas) Broadmoor, LLC. v. Ernest N. Morial New Orleans Exhibition Hall Auth., 867 So.2d 651, 656 (La.2004) ("In determining bidder responsibility, the public entity may look to financial ability, skill, integrity, business judgment, exp | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Cecil Hsugreen2 sentences2009See, e.g., Hsu, 852 F.2d at 408, 412 (while a thirty-minute interval between questioning "might ordinarily incline [the court] toward a conclusion that [the] right to cut off questioning was not respected," other applicable factors demonstrated that officers serupulously honored the defendant's rights). 2009See, e.g., Hsu, 852 F.2d at 408, 412 (while a thirty-minute interval between questioning "might ordinarily incline [the court] toward a conclusion that [the] right to cut off questioning was not respected," other applicable factors demonstrated that officers scrupulously honored the defendant's rights). | 1 | 1 |
McNichols v. City and County of Denvergreen2 sentences2009See Pallas v. Johnson, 100 Colo. 449, 452 , 68 P.2d 559, 560 (1937) (stating that factors for determining responsibility include "pecuniary ability ... judgment and skill, and the ability to promptly and satisfactorily carry on and complete the contract"); see also McNichols v. City & County of Denver, 130 Colo. 202, 209-10 , 274 P.2d 317, 321 (1954) (applying Pallas) Broadmoor, LLC. v. Ernest N. Morial New Orleans Exhibition Hall Auth., 867 So.2d 651, 656 (La.2004) ("In determining bidder responsibility, the public entity may look to financial ability, skill, integrity, business judgment, exp 2009See Pallas v. Johnson, 100 Colo. 449, 452 , 68 P.2d 559, 560 (1937) (stating that factors for determining responsibility include "pecuniary ability ... judgment and skill, and the ability to promptly and satisfactorily carry on and complete the contract"); see also McNichols v. City & County of Denver, 130 Colo. 202, 209-10 , 274 P.2d 317, 321 (1954) (applying Pallas) Broadmoor, LLC. v. Ernest N. Morial New Orleans Exhibition Hall Auth., 867 So.2d 651, 656 (La.2004) ("In determining bidder responsibility, the public entity may look to financial ability, skill, integrity, business judgment, exp | 1 | 1 |
Broadmoor, LLC v. ERNEST N. MORIAL EXHIBITIONgreen1 sentence2009See Pallas v. Johnson, 100 Colo. 449, 452 , 68 P.2d 559, 560 (1937) (stating that factors for determining responsibility include "pecuniary ability ... judgment and skill, and the ability to promptly and satisfactorily carry on and complete the contract"); see also McNichols v. City & County of Denver, 130 Colo. 202, 209-10 , 274 P.2d 317, 321 (1954) (applying Pallas) Broadmoor, LLC. v. Ernest N. Morial New Orleans Exhibition Hall Auth., 867 So.2d 651, 656 (La.2004) ("In determining bidder responsibility, the public entity may look to financial ability, skill, integrity, business judgment, exp | 1 | 1 |
H. L. v. Mathesongreen2 sentences1989Compare H.L. v. Matheson, 450 U.S. 398 , 101 S.Ct. 1164 , 67 L.Ed.2d 388 (1981) and Carey v. Population Servs. 1989Compare H.L. v. Matheson, 450 U.S. 398 , 101 S.Ct. 1164 , 67 L.Ed.2d 388 (1981) and Carey v. Population Servs. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
of MMV
green
2 sentences2025“To effectuate this purpose, [the UCCJEA] establishes a comprehensive framework that a Colorado court must follow to determine whether it may exercise jurisdiction in a child-custody matter or whether it must defer to a court of another state.” Id. ¶9 A juvenile court may exercise temporary emergency jurisdiction when jurisdiction is “necessary in an emergency to protect the child because the child . . . is subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse.” § 14-13-204(1), C.R.S. 2024. 2025Id. 2 ¶7 The UCCJEA “establishes a comprehensive framework that a Colorado court must follow to determine whether it may exercise jurisdiction in a child-custody matter or whether it must defer to a court of another state.” People in Interest of M.M.V., 2020 COA 94, ¶ 17 . | 6 | 2024–2025 |
in Int. of S.A.G
green
2 sentences2025People in Interest of S.A.G., 2021 CO 38, ¶ 21 . ¶8 The UCCJEA sets out a comprehensive framework that Colorado courts must use to determine whether they may exercise jurisdiction in child custody matters. 2025Id. 2 ¶7 The UCCJEA “establishes a comprehensive framework that a Colorado court must follow to determine whether it may exercise jurisdiction in a child-custody matter or whether it must defer to a court of another state.” People in Interest of M.M.V., 2020 COA 94, ¶ 17 . | 4 | 2024–2025 |
in Interest of A.B-A
green
2 sentences2024People in Interest of A.B-A., 2019 COA 125, ¶ 9 . ¶7 The UCCJEA prescribes two ways for a Colorado court to issue an initial child-custody determination: temporary emergency jurisdiction, § 14-13-204, C.R.S. 2024, and non-emergency 2 jurisdiction, § 14-13-201, C.R.S. 2024. 2020People in Interest of A.B-A., 2019 COA 125, ¶ 9 . | 2 | 2020–2024 |
People in re C.L.T
green
1 sentence2025People in Interest of C.L.T., 2 2017 COA 119 , ¶ 16. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
v. Rios
green
1 sentence2025“To effectuate this purpose, [the UCCJEA] establishes a comprehensive framework that a Colorado court must follow to determine whether it may exercise jurisdiction in a child-custody matter or whether it must defer to a court of another state.” Id. ¶8 A juvenile court may exercise temporary emergency jurisdiction when “necessary in an emergency to protect the child because the child . . . is subjected to or threatened with mistreatment or abuse.” § 14-13-204(1), C.R.S. 2024. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez
green
2 sentences2021Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez , 372 U.S. 144 , 168-69 , 83 S.Ct. 554 , 9 L.Ed.2d 644 ( 1963 ) . 2021Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez , 372 U.S. 144 , 168-69 , 83 S.Ct. 554 , 9 L.Ed.2d 644 ( 1963 ) . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.
green
2 sentences2013The intent to displace state law altogether can be inferred from a framework of regulation "so pervasive ... that Congress left no room for the States to supplement it" or where there is a "federal interest ... so dominant that the federal system will be assumed to preclude enforcement of state laws on the same subject." Id. at ----, 132 S.Ct. at 2501 (quoting Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 U.S. 218 , 230, 67 S.Ct. 1146 , 91 L.Ed. 1447 (1947) ). ¶ 76 The Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 - 1537(INA), provides a comprehensive framework to penalize the transportation, conce 2013The intent to displace state law altogether can be inferred from a framework of regulation "so pervasive ... that Congress left no room for the States to supplement it" or where there is a "federal interest ... so dominant that the federal system will be assumed to preclude enforcement of state laws on the same subject." Id. at ----, 132 S.Ct. at 2501 (quoting Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 U.S. 218 , 230, 67 S.Ct. 1146 , 91 L.Ed. 1447 (1947) ). ¶ 76 The Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 - 1537(INA), provides a comprehensive framework to penalize the transportation, conce | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Arizona v. United States
green
2 sentences2013The intent to displace state law altogether can be inferred from a framework of regulation "so pervasive ... that Congress left no room for the States to supplement it" or where there is a "federal interest ... so dominant that the federal system will be assumed to preclude enforcement of state laws on the same subject." Id. at ----, 132 S.Ct. at 2501 (quoting Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 U.S. 218 , 230, 67 S.Ct. 1146 , 91 L.Ed. 1447 (1947) ). ¶ 76 The Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 - 1537(INA), provides a comprehensive framework to penalize the transportation, conce 2013The intent to displace state law altogether can be inferred from a framework of regulation "so pervasive ... that Congress left no room for the States to supplement it" or where there is a "federal interest ... so dominant that the federal system will be assumed to preclude enforcement of state laws on the same subject." Id. at ----, 132 S.Ct. at 2501 (quoting Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp., 331 U.S. 218 , 230, 67 S.Ct. 1146 , 91 L.Ed. 1447 (1947) ). ¶ 76 The Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 - 1537(INA), provides a comprehensive framework to penalize the transportation, conce | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Georgia Latino Alliance for Human Rights v. Governor of Georgia
green
1 sentence2013Ga. Latino Alliance for Human Rights v. Governor, 691 F.3d 1250 , 1263-64 (11th Cir.2012). | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Palazzolo v. Rhode Island
green
1 sentence2001Id. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Sutherland v. Davis
green
2 sentences1953A comprehensive analysis of the question appears in Sutherland v. Davis, 286 Ky. 743 , 151 S.W. (2d) 1021 , from which we quote the following: “Admissions are divided into 2 classes which are designated in Wigmore in his work on evidence as (1) quasi admissions and (2) judicial admissions. 1953A comprehensive analysis of the question appears in Sutherland v. Davis, 286 Ky. 743 , 151 S.W. (2d) 1021 , from which we quote the following: “Admissions are divided into 2 classes which are designated in Wigmore in his work on evidence as (1) quasi admissions and (2) judicial admissions. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.