15 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Van Dusen v. Stottsgreen2 sentences2013The question of when a plaintiff alleging medical malpractice “discovered facts which, in the exercise of reasonable diligence, should lead to the discovery of the medical malpractice and resulting injury, is often a question of fact.” Van Dusen v. Stotts, 712 N.E.2d 491, 499 (Ind.1999). 2001The question of when a plaintiff alleging medical malpractice "discovered facts which, in the exercise of reasonable dili gence, should lead to the discovery of the medical malpractice and resulting injury, is often a question of fact." Van Dusen v. Stotts, 712 N.E.2d 491, 499 (Ind.1999). | 2 | 2 |
Indianapolis Athletic Club, Inc. v. Alco Standard Corp.green2 sentences2003See Morgen v. Ford Motor Company, 762 N.E.2d 137, 143 (Ind.Ct.App.2002), trans. granted, 783 N.E.2d 701 (Ind.2002); Indianapolis Athletic Club, Inc. v. Alco Standard Corp., 709 N.E.2d 1070, 1072 (Ind.Ct.App.1999), trans. denied; Marshall, 680 N.E.2d at 1108 . 2002Indianapolis Athletic Club, Inc. v. Alco Standard Corp., 709 N.E.2d 1070, 1072 (Ind.Ct.App.1999), trans. denied. | 2 | 2 |
Foley v. Case Corp.green1 sentence2018Ind. 2004) ("product alteration is a complete defense" to a products liability claim); Foley v. Case Corp. , 884 F.Supp. 313 , 315 (S.D. | 1 | 1 |
Reed v. Central Soya Co., Inc.green2 sentences2010In Reed v. Central Soya Co., Inc., the plaintiff's products liability claim alleged damages caused by their dairy cattle having eaten contaminated feed manufactured and sold by the defendants. 621 N.E.2d 1069, 1070 (Ind.1993). 2010We wrote that where loss is solely economic in nature, i.e., where there was no damage to other property or person, "such losses are more appropriately recovered by contract remedies." Id. at 1075 . | 1 | 1 |
Ellenwine v. Fairleygreen1 sentence2008Our decision in Ellenwine v. Fairley dictates that the claim was not timely filed. 846 N.E.2d 657, 666 (Ind.2006). | 1 | 1 |
Thiele v. Faygo Beverage, Inc.green2 sentences2006See Thiele v. Faygo Beverage, Inc., 489 N.E.2d 562, 588 (Ind.Ct.App.1986), trans. denied. 2006See Thiele v. Faygo Beverage, Inc., 489 N.E.2d 562, 588 (Ind.Ct.App.1986), trams. denied. | 1 | 1 |
Lane v. Barringergreen1 sentence2005See Lame, 407 N.E.2d at 1175 . | 1 | 1 |
Morgen v. Ford Motor Co.green1 sentence2003See Morgen v. Ford Motor Company, 762 N.E.2d 137, 143 (Ind.Ct.App.2002), trans. granted, 783 N.E.2d 701 (Ind.2002); Indianapolis Athletic Club, Inc. v. Alco Standard Corp., 709 N.E.2d 1070, 1072 (Ind.Ct.App.1999), trans. denied; Marshall, 680 N.E.2d at 1108 . | 1 | 1 |
American Optical Co. v. Weidenhamergreen1 sentence1981American Optical Co. v. Weidenhamer, (1980) Ind.App., 404 N.E.2d 606, 614 (transfer pending); Gilbert v. Stone Const. Co., lnc., (1976) 171 Ind.App. 418, 424 , 357 N.E.2d 738, 743 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gilbert v. Stone City Const. Co., Inc.
green
2 sentences1981American Optical Co. v. Weidenhamer, (1980) Ind.App., 404 N.E.2d 606, 614 (transfer pending); Gilbert v. Stone Const. Co., lnc., (1976) 171 Ind.App. 418, 424 , 357 N.E.2d 738, 743 . 1980For a plaintiff to establish a products liability claim under 402A he must prove: “(1) that he was injured by the product, (2) because it was defective and unreasonably dangerous, (3) that the defect existed at the time the product left the hands of the defendant, and (4) the product was expected to and did reach the consumer without substantial change in its condition.” Gilbert v. Stone City Construction Co., Inc., (1976) Ind.App., 357 N.E.2d 738, 743 , (citing W. | 2 | 1980–1981 |
Guideone Insurance Co. v. U.S. Water Systems, Inc.
green
1 sentence2019Although Indiana courts have not yet determined how the economic loss doctrine and the "other property" exception should apply to farm equipment, Farm Bureau maintains that the cases in which the courts have applied this area of the law in the context of consumer products and buildings provide guidance on how this issue of first impression should be determined. [23] Farm Bureau relies on two Indiana cases to support its argument, Gunkel and Guideone Insurance Co. v. U.S. Water Systems, Inc. , 950 N.E.2d 1236 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Marshall v. Clark Equipment Co.
green
1 sentence2003See Morgen v. Ford Motor Company, 762 N.E.2d 137, 143 (Ind.Ct.App.2002), trans. granted, 783 N.E.2d 701 (Ind.2002); Indianapolis Athletic Club, Inc. v. Alco Standard Corp., 709 N.E.2d 1070, 1072 (Ind.Ct.App.1999), trans. denied; Marshall, 680 N.E.2d at 1108 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Miller v. Todd
green
1 sentence1995Miller, 551 N.E.2d at 1143 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Gregg
green
1 sentence1991Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Gregg (1990), Ind.App., 554 N.E.2d 1145, 1155 , trans. denied; I.C. § 33-1-1.5-4(b)(4). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Ayr-Way Stores, Inc. v. Chitwood Ex Rel. Chitwood
green
2 sentences1983Ayrway Stores, Inc. v. Chitwood, (1973) 261 Ind. 86, 93 , 300 N.E.2d 335, 340 . 1983Ayrway Stores, Inc. v. Chitwood, (1973) 261 Ind. 86, 93 , 300 N.E.2d 335, 340 . | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.