15 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
D.W. v. R.W.green1 sentence2026The trial court then analyzed the factors set forth by our Supreme Court in D.W. v. R.W., 212 N.J. 232, 257 (2012), that are necessary for determining whether good cause exists to order genetic testing. | 1 | 1 |
Moore v. Hafeezagreen2 sentences1997In Moore v. Hafeeza, supra, 212 N.J.Super. at 406, 515 A.2d 271 , a mother’s paternity claim was barred because for unexplained reasons she had done nothing for fifteen years to assert her claim, during which time the putative father had been denied the right to attempt to develop a relationship with the child and had incurred other obligations that would make it unfair to now burden him with supporting the child. 1997In Moore v. Hafeeza, supra, 212 N.J.Super. at 406, 515 A.2d 271 , a mother’s paternity claim was barred because for unexplained reasons she had done nothing for fifteen years to assert her claim, during which time the putative father had been denied the right to attempt to develop a relationship with the child and had incurred other obligations that would make it unfair to now burden him with supporting the child. | 1 | 1 |
Lalli v. Lalligreen2 sentences1996See Lalli v. Lalli, 439 U.S. 259, 271 , 99 S.Ct. 518, 526 , 58 L.Ed.2d 503, 513 (1978). 1996See Lalli v. Lalli, 439 U.S. 259, 271 , 99 S.Ct. 518, 526 , 58 L.Ed.2d 503, 513 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Estate of Greenwoodgreen2 sentences1996See, e.g., In re Estate of Greenwood, 402 Pa.Super. 536 , 587 A.2d 749 , 751-54 , appeal denied, 529 Pa. 634 , 600 A.2d 953 (1991); C.L.W. v. M.J., 254 N.W.2A 446, 449-450 (N.D.1977); Thompson v. Coates, 627 S.W.2d 376 (Tenn.App.1981). 1996See, e.g., In re Estate of Greenwood, 402 Pa.Super. 536 , 587 A.2d 749 , 751-54 , appeal denied, 529 Pa. 634 , 600 A.2d 953 (1991); C.L.W. v. M.J., 254 N.W.2A 446, 449-450 (N.D.1977); Thompson v. Coates, 627 S.W.2d 376 (Tenn.App.1981). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mf v. Nh
green
2 sentences2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988 2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988 | 3 | 2000–2012 |
Tw v. Aw
green
2 sentences2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988 2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988 | 3 | 1997–2000 |
Jhordan C. v. MARY K.
green
2 sentences2011Jhordan, supra, 224 Cal.Rptr. at 537 . 2011Jhordan, supra, 224 Cal.Rptr. at 537 . | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Monmouth County Social Serv. v. Paq
green
2 sentences2003The case is a far cry from the facts in Monmouth County Social Services v. P.A.Q., 317 N.J.Super. 187 , 721 A.2d 738 (App.Div. 1998), in which a support order was vacated pursuant to Rule 4:50-l(f) on the basis of exceptional circumstances. 2003The case is a far cry from the facts in Monmouth County Social Services v. P.A.Q., 317 N.J.Super. 187 , 721 A.2d 738 (App.Div. 1998), in which a support order was vacated pursuant to Rule 4:50-l(f) on the basis of exceptional circumstances. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
C.R. v. J.G.
green
2 sentences2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988 2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988 | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Jensen v. Jensen
neutral
2 sentences2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988 2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988 | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Ak v. Sk
green
2 sentences2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988 2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988 | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Koelle v. Zwiren
green
2 sentences1999Id., 220 Ill.Dec. 51 , 672 N.E.2d at 871 . 1999Id., 220 Ill.Dec. 51 , 672 N.E.2d at 871 . | 2 | 1999–1999 |
Js v. Ls
green
1 sentence2018J.S., 389 N.J. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Fb v. Alg
green
1 sentence2015Ibid. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Tonnessen v. Denver Publishing Co.
green
1 sentence2015Id. at 962 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Harvey v. Essex County Board of Freeholders
green
2 sentences1996However, even though “[t]he word ‘may1 is ordinarily permissive or directory, and the words ‘must’ and ‘shall’ are generally mandatoryt, s]ueh terms ... have been held to be interchangeable whenever necessary to execute the clear intent of the Legislature.” Harvey v. Essex County Bd. of Freeholders, 30 N.J. 381, 391-92 , 153 A.2d 10 (1959). 1996However, even though “[t]he word ‘may1 is ordinarily permissive or directory, and the words ‘must’ and ‘shall’ are generally mandatoryt, s]ueh terms ... have been held to be interchangeable whenever necessary to execute the clear intent of the Legislature.” Harvey v. Essex County Bd. of Freeholders, 30 N.J. 381, 391-92 , 153 A.2d 10 (1959). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Thompson v. Coates
green
1 sentence1996See, e.g., In re Estate of Greenwood, 402 Pa.Super. 536 , 587 A.2d 749 , 751-54 , appeal denied, 529 Pa. 634 , 600 A.2d 953 (1991); C.L.W. v. M.J., 254 N.W.2A 446, 449-450 (N.D.1977); Thompson v. Coates, 627 S.W.2d 376 (Tenn.App.1981). | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.