paternity test (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

paternity test in New Jersey

15 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
D.W. v. R.W.green
nj · 2012 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026
1 sentence

2026The trial court then analyzed the factors set forth by our Supreme Court in D.W. v. R.W., 212 N.J. 232, 257 (2012), that are necessary for determining whether good cause exists to order genetic testing.

11
Moore v. Hafeezagreen
njsuperctappdiv · 1986 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
2 sentences

1997In Moore v. Hafeeza, supra, 212 N.J.Super. at 406, 515 A.2d 271 , a mother’s paternity claim was barred because for unexplained reasons she had done nothing for fifteen years to assert her claim, during which time the putative father had been denied the right to attempt to develop a relationship with the child and had incurred other obligations that would make it unfair to now burden him with supporting the child.

1997In Moore v. Hafeeza, supra, 212 N.J.Super. at 406, 515 A.2d 271 , a mother’s paternity claim was barred because for unexplained reasons she had done nothing for fifteen years to assert her claim, during which time the putative father had been denied the right to attempt to develop a relationship with the child and had incurred other obligations that would make it unfair to now burden him with supporting the child.

11
Lalli v. Lalligreen
scotus · 1978 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996See Lalli v. Lalli, 439 U.S. 259, 271 , 99 S.Ct. 518, 526 , 58 L.Ed.2d 503, 513 (1978).

1996See Lalli v. Lalli, 439 U.S. 259, 271 , 99 S.Ct. 518, 526 , 58 L.Ed.2d 503, 513 (1978).

11
In Re Estate of Greenwoodgreen
pasuperct · 1991 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1996–1996
2 sentences

1996See, e.g., In re Estate of Greenwood, 402 Pa.Super. 536 , 587 A.2d 749 , 751-54 , appeal denied, 529 Pa. 634 , 600 A.2d 953 (1991); C.L.W. v. M.J., 254 N.W.2A 446, 449-450 (N.D.1977); Thompson v. Coates, 627 S.W.2d 376 (Tenn.App.1981).

1996See, e.g., In re Estate of Greenwood, 402 Pa.Super. 536 , 587 A.2d 749 , 751-54 , appeal denied, 529 Pa. 634 , 600 A.2d 953 (1991); C.L.W. v. M.J., 254 N.W.2A 446, 449-450 (N.D.1977); Thompson v. Coates, 627 S.W.2d 376 (Tenn.App.1981).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (13)

CaseCitedYears
Mf v. Nh green
njsuperctappdiv · 1991
2 sentences

2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988

2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988

32000–2012
Tw v. Aw green
njsuperctappdiv · 1988
2 sentences

2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988

2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988

31997–2000
Jhordan C. v. MARY K. green
calctapp · 1986
2 sentences

2011Jhordan, supra, 224 Cal.Rptr. at 537 .

2011Jhordan, supra, 224 Cal.Rptr. at 537 .

22011–2011
Monmouth County Social Serv. v. Paq green
njsuperctappdiv · 1998
2 sentences

2003The case is a far cry from the facts in Monmouth County Social Services v. P.A.Q., 317 N.J.Super. 187 , 721 A.2d 738 (App.Div. 1998), in which a support order was vacated pursuant to Rule 4:50-l(f) on the basis of exceptional circumstances.

2003The case is a far cry from the facts in Monmouth County Social Services v. P.A.Q., 317 N.J.Super. 187 , 721 A.2d 738 (App.Div. 1998), in which a support order was vacated pursuant to Rule 4:50-l(f) on the basis of exceptional circumstances.

22003–2003
C.R. v. J.G. green
njsuperctappdiv · 1997
2 sentences

2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988

2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988

22000–2000
Jensen v. Jensen neutral
njsuperctappdiv · 1951
2 sentences

2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988

2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988

22000–2000
Ak v. Sk green
njsuperctappdiv · 1993
2 sentences

2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988

2000It should be noted that had S.B. and R.K. not signed the August 9, 1999 consent order agreeing to the paternity test, but instead, R .K, after ten years, sought a court order for a genetic test, his request, in all likelihood, would have been denied because, prior to ordering a genetic test to establish paternity, there must be a finding that such an order would “serve[ ] the best interests of the child.” See A.K. v. S.K., 264 N.J.Super. 79 , 624 A.2d 36 (App.Div.1993), M.F. v. N.H., 252 N.J.Super. 420, 599 A.2d 1297 (App.Div.1991); T.W. v. A.W., 224 N.J.Super. 675 , 541 A.2d 265 (App.Div.1988

22000–2000
Koelle v. Zwiren green
illappct · 1996
2 sentences

1999Id., 220 Ill.Dec. 51 , 672 N.E.2d at 871 .

1999Id., 220 Ill.Dec. 51 , 672 N.E.2d at 871 .

21999–1999
Js v. Ls green
njsuperctappdiv · 2006
1 sentence

2018J.S., 389 N.J.

12018–2018
Fb v. Alg green
nj · 2003
1 sentence

2015Ibid.

12015–2015
Tonnessen v. Denver Publishing Co. green
coloctapp · 2000
1 sentence

2015Id. at 962 .

12015–2015
Harvey v. Essex County Board of Freeholders green
nj · 1959
2 sentences

1996However, even though “[t]he word ‘may1 is ordinarily permissive or directory, and the words ‘must’ and ‘shall’ are generally mandatoryt, s]ueh terms ... have been held to be interchangeable whenever necessary to execute the clear intent of the Legislature.” Harvey v. Essex County Bd. of Freeholders, 30 N.J. 381, 391-92 , 153 A.2d 10 (1959).

1996However, even though “[t]he word ‘may1 is ordinarily permissive or directory, and the words ‘must’ and ‘shall’ are generally mandatoryt, s]ueh terms ... have been held to be interchangeable whenever necessary to execute the clear intent of the Legislature.” Harvey v. Essex County Bd. of Freeholders, 30 N.J. 381, 391-92 , 153 A.2d 10 (1959).

11996–1996
Thompson v. Coates green
tennctapp · 1981
1 sentence

1996See, e.g., In re Estate of Greenwood, 402 Pa.Super. 536 , 587 A.2d 749 , 751-54 , appeal denied, 529 Pa. 634 , 600 A.2d 953 (1991); C.L.W. v. M.J., 254 N.W.2A 446, 449-450 (N.D.1977); Thompson v. Coates, 627 S.W.2d 376 (Tenn.App.1981).

11996–1996

Where else courts name it

CA 58 (1975–2023) PA 43 (1982–2025) TX 24 (2003–2022) NY 20 (1969–2025) AL 19 (1933–2018) FL 16 (1987–2025) NJ 15 (1996–2026) LA 12 (1969–2018) IL 12 (1996–2025) OH 12 (1977–2020) UT 11 (2001–2026) NC 11 (1994–2021) MD 11 (1998–2022) NV 10 (2007–2026) NM 9 (2009–2019) AR 9 (1996–2022) MS 8 (1977–2014) IA 8 (1995–2022) TN 8 (1997–2019) MO 7 (2001–2024) WV 7 (1985–2021) MI 7 (1991–2026) MA 7 (1992–2024) OR 6 (1978–2026) AZ 6 (1990–2024) CT 6 (1986–2016) ID 6 (2010–2025) VA 6 (2005–2020) IN 6 (1975–2014) MN 5 (1997–2017) SC 5 (2001–2017) DC 5 (1970–2021) GA 5 (1979–2009) KS 4 (2011–2021) CO 4 (1989–2020) RI 3 (2000–2017) ND 3 (2002–2012) WY 3 (2004–2014) OK 3 (2011–2014) SD 3 (1996–2006) VI 2 (2024–2025) AK 2 (2001–2009) MT 2 (2003–2022)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check