Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
MPC, Inc. v. Kennygreen2 sentences2016Prince George’s County v. Brent, 414 Md. 334, 342 , 995 A.2d 672, 677 (2010), quoting MPC, Inc. v. Kenny, 279 Md. 29, 32 , 367 A.2d 486, 488-89 (1977). 2016Prince George’s County v. Brent, 414 Md. 334, 342 , 995 A.2d 672, 677 (2010), quoting MPC, Inc. v. Kenny, 279 Md. 29, 32 , 367 A.2d 486, 488-89 (1977). | 2 | 2 |
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY v. Brentgreen2 sentences2016Prince George’s County v. Brent, 414 Md. 334, 342 , 995 A.2d 672, 677 (2010), quoting MPC, Inc. v. Kenny, 279 Md. 29, 32 , 367 A.2d 486, 488-89 (1977). 2016Prince George’s County v. Brent, 414 Md. 334, 342 , 995 A.2d 672, 677 (2010), quoting MPC, Inc. v. Kenny, 279 Md. 29, 32 , 367 A.2d 486, 488-89 (1977). | 2 | 2 |
Evans v. Wilsongreen2 sentences2017See Kamp v. Department of Human Services, 410 Md. 645, 661 , 980 A.2d 448 (2009)(quoting Evans v. Wilson, 382 Md. 614, 629 , 856 A.2d 679 (2004))(“...prerequisite to ordering a blood or genetic test, the trial court should be satisfied that good cause for the testing has been shown, that ‘blood or genetic testing would be in the best interest of the child.’ ”)(emphasis added). 2017See Kamp v. Department of Human Services, 410 Md. 645, 661 , 980 A.2d 448 (2009)(quoting Evans v. Wilson, 382 Md. 614, 629 , 856 A.2d 679 (2004))(“...prerequisite to ordering a blood or genetic test, the trial court should be satisfied that good cause for the testing has been shown, that ‘blood or genetic testing would be in the best interest of the child.’ ”)(emphasis added). | 1 | 3 |
Hardy v. Hardygreen2 sentences2016Id. 2016Id. at 358. | 1 | 2 |
Glenda Del Carmen Benitez v. John Doegreen1 sentence2019See Benitez , 193 A.3d at 136 . | 1 | 1 |
Kamp v. Department of Human Servicesgreen2 sentences2017See Kamp v. Department of Human Services, 410 Md. 645, 661 , 980 A.2d 448 (2009)(quoting Evans v. Wilson, 382 Md. 614, 629 , 856 A.2d 679 (2004))(“...prerequisite to ordering a blood or genetic test, the trial court should be satisfied that good cause for the testing has been shown, that ‘blood or genetic testing would be in the best interest of the child.’ ”)(emphasis added). 2017See Kamp v. Department of Human Services, 410 Md. 645, 661 , 980 A.2d 448 (2009)(quoting Evans v. Wilson, 382 Md. 614, 629 , 856 A.2d 679 (2004))(“...prerequisite to ordering a blood or genetic test, the trial court should be satisfied that good cause for the testing has been shown, that ‘blood or genetic testing would be in the best interest of the child.’ ”)(emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Roberto D.B.
green
2 sentences2022Further, when applying a paternity presumption in a civil dispute regarding parentage, “the burden is on the complainant to prove that the ‘alleged father is the father of the child.’” In re Roberto d.B., 399 Md. 267, 276 (2007); FL § 5-1027(a) (“At the trial, the burden is on the complainant to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the alleged father is the father of the child.”). 2022Further, when applying a paternity presumption in a civil dispute regarding parentage, “the burden is on the complainant to prove that the ‘alleged father is the father of the child.’” In re Roberto d.B., 399 Md. 267, 276 (2007); FL § 5-1027(a) (“At the trial, the burden is on the complainant to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that the alleged father is the father of the child.”). | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Attorney Grievance Commission v. AYELE
green
2 sentences2016Id. 2016Id. | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Langston v. Riffe
green
2 sentences2016Langston v. Riffe, then, presented us with the issue of whether declarations of paternity, based on a paternity agreement, as well as two consent decrees, could be set aside, 10 It was our decision in Langston to set aside the paternity declarations but, most especially our determination that “a blood or genetic test is to be triggered automatically when any party, including the putative father, moves to have testing conducted”, Langston, 359 Md. at 425 , 754 A.2d at 404 , upon which Mr. Davis relies to pursue a paternity test. 2016Langston v. Riffe, then, presented us with the issue of whether declarations of paternity, based on a paternity agreement, as well as two consent decrees, could be set aside, 10 It was our decision in Langston to set aside the paternity declarations but, most especially our determination that “a blood or genetic test is to be triggered automatically when any party, including the putative father, moves to have testing conducted”, Langston, 359 Md. at 425 , 754 A.2d at 404 , upon which Mr. Davis relies to pursue a paternity test. | 2 | 2003–2016 |
Miles v. Stovall
green
2 sentences2007“The court denied [Miles’s] request for blood tests and dismissed the case without prejudice, based on the presumption that Miles [was] Brandon’s father.” Id. at 74 , 750 A.2d 729 . 2007“The court denied [Miles’s] request for blood tests and dismissed the case without prejudice, based on the presumption that Miles [was] Brandon’s father.” Id. at 74 , 750 A.2d 729 . | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Tyrone W. v. DANIELLE R.
green
2 sentences2003He argued, inter alia, that California lacked personal jurisdiction; he was not afforded an opportunity to be heard; and he had a defense under the laws of Maryland, *323 because he is entitled to a paternity test under F.L. § 5-1038 and the case of Tyrone W. v. Danielle R., 129 Md.App. 260 , 741 A.2d 553 (1999), aff'd, Langston v. Riffe, 359 Md. 396 , 754 A.2d 389 (2000). 2003He argued, inter alia, that California lacked personal jurisdiction; he was not afforded an opportunity to be heard; and he had a defense under the laws of Maryland, *323 because he is entitled to a paternity test under F.L. § 5-1038 and the case of Tyrone W. v. Danielle R., 129 Md.App. 260 , 741 A.2d 553 (1999), aff'd, Langston v. Riffe, 359 Md. 396 , 754 A.2d 389 (2000). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Tandra S. v. Tyrone W.
green
2 sentences2000In fact, she had already legally changed the child’s last name “to reflect his true lineage and parentage.” Id. at 308 , 648 A.2d at 441 . 2000In fact, she had already legally changed the child’s last name “to reflect his true lineage and parentage.” Id. at 308 , 648 A.2d at 441 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Koelle v. Zwiren
green
1 sentence1998Id. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Miller v. Miller
green
1 sentence1998Id. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.