6 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dupuis v. Submarine Base Credit Union, Inc.green2 sentences2002The petition presently before the court was initiated not by the named plaintiff mother, but by the State of Connecticut pursuant to its authority under General Statutes § 46b-162 . "[E]stoppel may not generally be invoked against a public agency in the exercise of its governmental functions. . . ." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Dornfried v. October Twenty-Four, Inc . , 230 Conn. 622 , 635 , 646 A.2d 772 (1994); Coyle v. Covington, 14 S.M.D. ___ (2000); see also Dupuis v. Submarine Base Credit Union, Inc . , 170 Conn. 344 , 353 , 365 A.2d 1093 (1976); Ammirata v. Zoning Board of Appeals 2002The petition presently before the court was initiated not by the named plaintiff mother, but by the State of Connecticut pursuant to its authority under General Statutes § 46b-162 . "[E]stoppel may not generally be invoked against a public agency in the exercise of its governmental functions. . . ." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Dornfried v. October Twenty-Four, Inc . , 230 Conn. 622 , 635 , 646 A.2d 772 (1994); Coyle v. Covington, 14 S.M.D. ___ (2000); see also Dupuis v. Submarine Base Credit Union, Inc . , 170 Conn. 344 , 353 , 365 A.2d 1093 (1976); Ammirata v. Zoning Board of Appeals | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re Shaiesha O.
green
2 sentences2016Id., at 46 , 887 A.2d 415 . 2016Id., at 46 , 887 A.2d 415 . | 2 | 2016–2016 |
Dornfried v. October Twenty-Four, Inc.
green
2 sentences2002The petition presently before the court was initiated not by the named plaintiff mother, but by the State of Connecticut pursuant to its authority under General Statutes § 46b-162 . "[E]stoppel may not generally be invoked against a public agency in the exercise of its governmental functions. . . ." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Dornfried v. October Twenty-Four, Inc . , 230 Conn. 622 , 635 , 646 A.2d 772 (1994); Coyle v. Covington, 14 S.M.D. ___ (2000); see also Dupuis v. Submarine Base Credit Union, Inc . , 170 Conn. 344 , 353 , 365 A.2d 1093 (1976); Ammirata v. Zoning Board of Appeals 2002The petition presently before the court was initiated not by the named plaintiff mother, but by the State of Connecticut pursuant to its authority under General Statutes § 46b-162 . "[E]stoppel may not generally be invoked against a public agency in the exercise of its governmental functions. . . ." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Dornfried v. October Twenty-Four, Inc . , 230 Conn. 622 , 635 , 646 A.2d 772 (1994); Coyle v. Covington, 14 S.M.D. ___ (2000); see also Dupuis v. Submarine Base Credit Union, Inc . , 170 Conn. 344 , 353 , 365 A.2d 1093 (1976); Ammirata v. Zoning Board of Appeals | 1 | 2002–2002 |
In re Roshawn R.
green
1 sentence2001Mr. L was incarcerated on October 14, 1998, and while incarceration by itself does not constitute abandonment ( In re Roshawn R ., 51 Conn. App. 44 , 53 (1998)) Mr. L did not at any time ask D.C.F. for visits with Sasha or for D.C.F. to provide any services to help with reunification. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
In re Juvenile Appeal
green
1 sentence2000"There are five general obligations to parenthood: (1) express love and CT Page 6792 affection for the child; (2) express personal concern over the health, education and general well-being of the child; (3) the duty to supply the necessary food, clothing and medical care; (4) the duty to provide an adequate domicile; and (5) the duty to provide social and religious guidance." In re Juvenile Appeal (Docket No. 9489), 183 Conn. 11 , 14 (1981). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Mills v. Habluetzel
green
2 sentences1986Obviously, if the new statute now controls the ultimate disposition of the paternity claim against the defendant, as we conclude, it would serve no useful purpose to determine whether our former three year statute is subject to the infirmities that have resulted in invalidating the one year statute in Mills v. Habluetzel, 456 U.S. 91 , 102 S. Ct. 1549 , 71 L. 1986Obviously, if the new statute now controls the ultimate disposition of the paternity claim against the defendant, as we conclude, it would serve no useful purpose to determine whether our former three year statute is subject to the infirmities that have resulted in invalidating the one year statute in Mills v. Habluetzel, 456 U.S. 91 , 102 S. Ct. 1549 , 71 L. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Pickett v. Brown
green
2 sentences1986Ed. 2d 770 (1982), or the two year statute in Pickett v. Brown, 462 U.S. 1 , 103 S. Ct. 2199 , 76 L. 1986Ed. 2d 770 (1982), or the two year statute in Pickett v. Brown, 462 U.S. 1 , 103 S. Ct. 2199 , 76 L. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.