10 Nevada opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Estate of Jothamgreen2 sentences2015Id. (citing In re Estate of Jotham, 704 N.W.2d 210, 215 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005)). 2015Id. (citing In re Estate of Jotham, 704 N.W.2d 210, 215 (Minn. Ct. App. 2005)). | 2 | 2 |
In Re the Estate of Jothamgreen2 sentences2026Id. at 454 . 2015Id. at 449-50 . | 1 | 3 |
McLellan v. Stategreen2 sentences2020Mclellan v. State, 124 Nev. 263, 267 , 182 P.3d 106, 109 (2008) (reviewing evidentiary decisions for an abuse of discretion). 2020Mclellan v. State, 124 Nev. 263, 267 , 182 P.3d 106, 109 (2008) (reviewing evidentiary decisions for an abuse of discretion). | 1 | 1 |
Cook v. Cookgreen2 sentences2020Cook v. Cook, 112 Nev. 179, 181-82 , 912 P.2d 264, 265 (1996) (providing that a district court's decision denying a motion to set aside a judgment "will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion"). 2020Cook v. Cook, 112 Nev. 179, 181-82 , 912 P.2d 264, 265 (1996) (providing that a district court's decision denying a motion to set aside a judgment "will not be disturbed on appeal absent an abuse of discretion"). | 1 | 1 |
Willerton v. Basshamgreen2 sentences2015See Willerton, 111 Nev. at 21-22 , 889 P.2d at 830 . 2015See Willerton, 111 Nev. at 21-22 , 889 P.2d at 830 . | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Eighth Judicial District Courtgreen2 sentences2007NOTES [1] 122 Nev. 305 , 130 P.3d 657 (2006). [2] Richard informed DFS that he had been genetically tested before his incarceration, although whether he was referring to a DNA test incident to criminal case processing or to a paternity test is unclear. [3] Neither Doreen nor Richard appealed from the order terminating their parental rights. [4] 122 Nev. 305 , 130 P.3d 657 (2006). [5] Smith v. District Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677 , 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). [6] See NRS 34.160; Round Hill Gen. 2007NOTES [1] 122 Nev. 305 , 130 P.3d 657 (2006). [2] Richard informed DFS that he had been genetically tested before his incarceration, although whether he was referring to a DNA test incident to criminal case processing or to a paternity test is unclear. [3] Neither Doreen nor Richard appealed from the order terminating their parental rights. [4] 122 Nev. 305 , 130 P.3d 657 (2006). [5] Smith v. District Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677 , 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). [6] See NRS 34.160; Round Hill Gen. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hermanson v. Hermanson
green
2 sentences2017Thereafter, the parties disputed whether the husband was the biological father of the child, and the district court "referred the parties to a paternity hearing master with direction to order blood tests." Id. 2017Thereafter, the parties disputed whether the husband was the biological father of the child, and the district court "referred the parties to a paternity hearing master with direction to order blood tests." Id. | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Maria L. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada
green
2 sentences2007NOTES [1] 122 Nev. 305 , 130 P.3d 657 (2006). [2] Richard informed DFS that he had been genetically tested before his incarceration, although whether he was referring to a DNA test incident to criminal case processing or to a paternity test is unclear. [3] Neither Doreen nor Richard appealed from the order terminating their parental rights. [4] 122 Nev. 305 , 130 P.3d 657 (2006). [5] Smith v. District Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677 , 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). [6] See NRS 34.160; Round Hill Gen. 2007NOTES [1] 122 Nev. 305 , 130 P.3d 657 (2006). [2] Richard informed DFS that he had been genetically tested before his incarceration, although whether he was referring to a DNA test incident to criminal case processing or to a paternity test is unclear. [3] Neither Doreen nor Richard appealed from the order terminating their parental rights. [4] 122 Nev. 305 , 130 P.3d 657 (2006). [5] Smith v. District Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677 , 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991). [6] See NRS 34.160; Round Hill Gen. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.