6 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Adult & Family Services Division v. Bradley
green
2 sentences1984Ser. v. Bradley, 295 Or 216 , 666 P2d 249 (1983), it is clear that there can be no constitutional or statutory time bar to a filiation proceeding. 1 Reversed and remanded to the trial court for proceedings on the merits of the paternity claim. 1984Ser. v. Bradley, 295 Or 216 , 666 P2d 249 (1983), it is clear that there can be no constitutional or statutory time bar to a filiation proceeding. 1 Reversed and remanded to the trial court for proceedings on the merits of the paternity claim. | 2 | 1984–1984 |
Department of Human Services v. M. K.
green
2 sentences2026K., 257 Or App 409, 416 , 306 P3d 763 (2013) (stating that “[s]everal of our cases highlight the importance of considering whether a parent is likely to ben- efit from a service”). 3 We reject without extended discussion father’s assertion that, until ODHS confirmed paternity, he was a “legal stranger” to S. Under ORS 419B.875(1)(a)(C), father was a party to the proceeding as the “alleged genetic parent” of S. 226 Dept. of Human Services v. T. 2026K., 257 Or App 409, 416 , 306 P3d 763 (2013) (stating that “[s]everal of our cases highlight the importance of considering whether a parent is likely to ben- efit from a service”). 3 We reject without extended discussion father’s assertion that, until ODHS confirmed paternity, he was a “legal stranger” to S. Under ORS 419B.875(1)(a)(C), father was a party to the proceeding as the “alleged genetic parent” of S. 226 Dept. of Human Services v. T. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
In re the Estate of Nelson
neutral
1 sentence2024Id. at 240-41 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State Ex Rel. Department of Human Services v. Rardin
green
2 sentences2011Although the state proved that father did not come forward to claim paternity before 2009, when mother admitted to DHS that he was the father of the children, we do not agree that his request for a paternity test in 2009 is conduct or a condition demonstrating unfitness under the facts of this case and the Supreme Court’s decision in Rardin, 340 Or 436 . 2011Although the state proved that father did not come forward to claim paternity before 2009, when mother admitted to DHS that he was the father of the children, we do not agree that his request for a paternity test in 2009 is conduct or a condition demonstrating unfitness under the facts of this case and the Supreme Court’s decision in Rardin, 340 Or 436 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State ex rel. Karr v. Shorey
green
2 sentences1978The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court. 30 Or App 137 , 567 P2d 118 (1977), with a dissenting opinion by Thornton, J. 1978The Court of Appeals reversed the trial court. 30 Or App 137 , 567 P2d 118 (1977), with a dissenting opinion by Thornton, J. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.