6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Roger Carl Gordon v. Shannon Lee Hedrickgreen2 sentences2019Hamberlin also cited this Court’s decision in Gordon v. Hedrick, 159 Idaho 604 , 364 P.3d 951 (2015) for the proposition that a genetic test showing nonpaternity is not a sufficient ground to challenge a VAP. 2 Soon after submitting the paternity test results, Bradford moved to rescind the VAP, asserting that the motion was based on Idaho Code section 7-1106(2), 1 claiming that she had made a material mistake of fact by “stating that [Hamberlin] was the biological father of the minor child. . . .” Hamberlin again objected based on Gordon, arguing that based on the VAP, he is T.J.H.’s “legal fa 2019Hamberlin also cited this Court’s decision in Gordon v. Hedrick, 159 Idaho 604 , 364 P.3d 951 (2015) for the proposition that a genetic test showing nonpaternity is not a sufficient ground to challenge a VAP. 2 Soon after submitting the paternity test results, Bradford moved to rescind the VAP, asserting that the motion was based on Idaho Code section 7-1106(2), 1 claiming that she had made a material mistake of fact by “stating that [Hamberlin] was the biological father of the minor child. . . .” Hamberlin again objected based on Gordon, arguing that based on the VAP, he is T.J.H.’s “legal fa | 1 | 2 |
Hamberlin v. Bradfordgreen2 sentences2025See Hamberlin v. Bradford, 165 Idaho 947, 952 , 454 P.3d 589, 594 (2019); Gordon v. Hedrick, 159 Idaho 604, 610 , 364 P.3d 951, 957 (2015). 2025See Hamberlin v. Bradford, 165 Idaho 947, 952 , 454 P.3d 589, 594 (2019); Gordon v. Hedrick, 159 Idaho 604, 610 , 364 P.3d 951, 957 (2015). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Doegreen2 sentences2023State v. Doe, 143 Idaho 343, 346 , 144 P.3d 597, 600 (2006). 2023State v. Doe, 143 Idaho 343, 346 , 144 P.3d 597, 600 (2006). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Doe v. Roe
green
2 sentences2010In Doe, 142 Idaho at 205 , 127 P.3d at 108 , this Court found that merely entering a paternity test into evidence during a termination action, which is what John Doe has done in this case, does not satisfy the requirements of I.C. § 16-1504(1)(d). 2010In Doe, 142 Idaho at 205 , 127 P.3d at 108 , this Court found that merely entering a paternity test into evidence during a termination action, which is what John Doe has done in this case, does not satisfy the requirements of I.C. § 16-1504(1)(d). | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Matter of Baby Boy Doe
green
2 sentences2015Matter of Baby Boy Doe, 127 Idaho at 458-59 , 902 P.2d at 483-84 . 2015Matter of Baby Boy Doe, 127 Idaho at 458-59 , 902 P.2d at 483-84 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.