Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
24 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hamm v. Millennium Income Fund, L.L.C.green2 sentences2010However, "[i]t is axiomatic that an appellate court reviews the actions of a trial court based on the materials before the trial court at the time it acted." Hamm v. Millennium Income Fund, L.L.C., 178 S.W.3d 256, 272 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, pet. denied) (quoting Methodist Hosps. of Dallas v. Tall, 972 S.W.2d 894, 898 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1998, no pet.)). 2010However, “[i]t is axiomatic that an appellate court reviews the actions of a trial court based on the materials before the trial court at the time it acted.” Hamm v. Millennium Income Fund, L.L.C., 178 S.W.3d 256, 272 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, pet. denied) (quoting Methodist Hosps. of Dallas v. Tall, 972 S.W.2d 894, 898 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1998, no pet.)). | 3 | 3 |
Methodist Hospitals of Dallas v. Tallgreen2 sentences2010However, "[i]t is axiomatic that an appellate court reviews the actions of a trial court based on the materials before the trial court at the time it acted." Hamm v. Millennium Income Fund, L.L.C., 178 S.W.3d 256, 272 (Tex. App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, pet. denied) (quoting Methodist Hosps. of Dallas v. Tall, 972 S.W.2d 894, 898 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1998, no pet.)). 2010However, “[i]t is axiomatic that an appellate court reviews the actions of a trial court based on the materials before the trial court at the time it acted.” Hamm v. Millennium Income Fund, L.L.C., 178 S.W.3d 256, 272 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 2005, pet. denied) (quoting Methodist Hosps. of Dallas v. Tall, 972 S.W.2d 894, 898 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1998, no pet.)). | 3 | 3 |
Murdock v. Murdockgreen2 sentences2012We have held that a paternity test “conclusively proved” nonpaternity, Murdock v. Murdock, 811 S.W.2d 557, 560 (Tex. 1991), that documents that detailed a leaseholder’s wrongful acts and were sent and received 5 by royalty owners “conclusively establish[ed]” that the royalty owners had knowledge of such wrongdoing, Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., 348 S.W.3d 194 , 203–09 (Tex. 2011), and that “readily accessible, publicly available documents” conclusively established that a leaseholder’s alleged fraud could have been discovered through the exercise of reasonable diligence. 2012We have held that a paternity test “conclusively proved” nonpaternity, Murdock v. Murdock, 811 S.W.2d 557, 560 (Tex.1991), that documents that detailed a leaseholder’s wrongful acts and were sent and received by royalty owners “conclusively established]” that the royalty owners had knowledge of such wrongdoing, Exxon Carp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., 348 S.W.3d 194, 203-09 (Tex.2011), and that “readily accessible, publicly available documents” conclusively established that a leaseholder’s alleged fraud could have been discovered through the exercise of reasonable diligence. | 2 | 4 |
O.D. Stroud v. Stroudgreen2 sentences2003Stroud v. Stroud, 733 S.W.2d 619, 621 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1987, no writ). 2003Stroud v. Stroud, 733 S.W.2d 619, 621 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1987, no writ). | 2 | 2 |
Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., LCgreen2 sentences2012We have held that a paternity test “conclusively proved” nonpaternity, Murdock v. Murdock, 811 S.W.2d 557, 560 (Tex. 1991), that documents that detailed a leaseholder’s wrongful acts and were sent and received 5 by royalty owners “conclusively establish[ed]” that the royalty owners had knowledge of such wrongdoing, Exxon Corp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., 348 S.W.3d 194 , 203–09 (Tex. 2011), and that “readily accessible, publicly available documents” conclusively established that a leaseholder’s alleged fraud could have been discovered through the exercise of reasonable diligence. 2012We have held that a paternity test “conclusively proved” nonpaternity, Murdock v. Murdock, 811 S.W.2d 557, 560 (Tex.1991), that documents that detailed a leaseholder’s wrongful acts and were sent and received by royalty owners “conclusively established]” that the royalty owners had knowledge of such wrongdoing, Exxon Carp. v. Emerald Oil & Gas Co., 348 S.W.3d 194, 203-09 (Tex.2011), and that “readily accessible, publicly available documents” conclusively established that a leaseholder’s alleged fraud could have been discovered through the exercise of reasonable diligence. | 1 | 2 |
Shell Oil Co. v. Rossgreen2 sentences2012Shell Oil Co. v. Ross, 356 S.W.3d 924 , 929–30 (Tex. 2011). 2012Shell Oil Co. v. Ross, 356 S.W.3d 924, 929-30 (Tex.2011). | 1 | 2 |
Murphy v. Campbellgreen1 sentence2022See Murphy, 964 S.W.2d at 271 ; Willis, 760 S.W.2d at 645 . 17 a paternity test is unlikely to inquire about how the test was performed to discover potential injuries related to negligent or wrongful conduct in performing the test. | 1 | 1 |
In Re KWgreen1 sentence2020Our sister courts have found that summary termination is defeated when, inter alia, a father writes a letter to the trial court in which he states he is the child’s father;4 when a father who questions paternity throughout 4 See In re K.W., 138 S.W.3d 420, 430 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 2004, pet. denied); In re U.B., No. 04-12-00687-CV, 2013 WL 441890 , at *2 (Tex.App.—San Antonio Feb. 6, 2013, no pet.)(mem. op.). 12 a pending case files a general denial and fills out an appointed counsel request form in which he states he is the child’s parent;5 when a father acknowledges paternity to the Departme | 1 | 1 |
Martin v. Stategreen1 sentence2016See id. 1 Additionally, although the testimony might have had a tendency to suggest a decision on an improper basis because the testimony pertained to a previous sexual assault of a minor, because that type of evidence is inflammatory and can be unfairly prejudicial, see Gigliobianco, 210 S.W.3d at 641 (stating that evidence might encourage decision on improper basis if it arouses jury’s sympathy or hostility “without regard to the logical probative force of the evidence”); Martin, 176 S.W.3d at 897 (providing that evidence of sexual misconduct involving children is inherently inflammatory), a | 1 | 1 |
Gigliobianco v. Stategreen2 sentences2016See id. 1 Additionally, although the testimony might have had a tendency to suggest a decision on an improper basis because the testimony pertained to a previous sexual assault of a minor, because that type of evidence is inflammatory and can be unfairly prejudicial, see Gigliobianco, 210 S.W.3d at 641 (stating that evidence might encourage decision on improper basis if it arouses jury’s sympathy or hostility “without regard to the logical probative force of the evidence”); Martin, 176 S.W.3d at 897 (providing that evidence of sexual misconduct involving children is inherently inflammatory), a 2016See id. 1 Additionally, although the testimony might have had a tendency to suggest a decision on an improper basis because the testimony pertained to a previous sexual assault of a minor, because that type of evidence is inflammatory and can be unfairly prejudicial, see Gigliobianco, 210 S.W.3d at 641 (stating that evidence might encourage decision on improper basis if it arouses jury’s sympathy or hostility “without regard to the logical probative force of the evidence”); Martin, 176 S.W.3d at 897 (providing that evidence of sexual misconduct involving children is inherently inflammatory), a | 1 | 1 |
Gaytan v. Stategreen2 sentences2016See id. 1 Additionally, although the testimony might have had a tendency to suggest a decision on an improper basis because the testimony pertained to a previous sexual assault of a minor, because that type of evidence is inflammatory and can be unfairly prejudicial, see Gigliobianco, 210 S.W.3d at 641 (stating that evidence might encourage decision on improper basis if it arouses jury’s sympathy or hostility “without regard to the logical probative force of the evidence”); Martin, 176 S.W.3d at 897 (providing that evidence of sexual misconduct involving children is inherently inflammatory), a 2016See id. 1 Additionally, although the testimony might have had a tendency to suggest a decision on an improper basis because the testimony pertained to a previous sexual assault of a minor, because that type of evidence is inflammatory and can be unfairly prejudicial, see Gigliobianco, 210 S.W.3d at 641 (stating that evidence might encourage decision on improper basis if it arouses jury’s sympathy or hostility “without regard to the logical probative force of the evidence”); Martin, 176 S.W.3d at 897 (providing that evidence of sexual misconduct involving children is inherently inflammatory), a | 1 | 1 |
In Re KGgreen1 sentence2015See also In re K.G., 350 S.W.3d 338, 350-51 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2011, pet. denied) (reviewing the statutory scheme of chapter 161). | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of E.N.C., J.A.C., S.A.L., N.A.G. and C.G.L.green2 sentences2014Cf. In re K.E.S., No. 02-11-00420-CV, 2012 WL 4121127 , at *3 In re E.N.C., 384 S.W.3d 796, 802 (Tex. 2012). 2014Code Ann. § 101.007 (West 2008); E.N.C., 384 S.W.3d at 802 . 5 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth Sept. 20, 2012, pet. denied) (mem. op. on reh’g) (stating that father admitted paternity under section 161.002 when, although he did not file a counterclaim of paternity or for voluntary paternity under chapter 160, he responded to a CPS letter acknowledging that he believed the child to be his and cooperated when asked to take a paternity test, which was admitted without objection at trial, allowing the issue to be tried by consent). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Estes v. Dallas County Child Welfare Unit of Texas Department of Human Services
green
2 sentences2004No person in their right human mind would want their child taken away from them when the[y] are trying everything to prove themselves as a parent." We find guidance in the case of Estes v. Dallas County Child Welfare Unit of Texas Department of Human Services, 773 S.W.2d 800 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1989, writ denied), which was decided under a former but very similar version of the family code. 2004No person in their right human mind would want their child taken away from them when the[y] are trying everything to prove themselves as a parent.” We find guidance in the case of Estes v. Dallas County Child Welfare Unit of Texas Department of Human Services, 773 S.W.2d 800 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1989, writ denied), which was decided under a former but very similar version of the family code. | 3 | 2004–2004 |
Willis v. Maverick
green
1 sentence2022See Murphy, 964 S.W.2d at 271 ; Willis, 760 S.W.2d at 645 . 17 a paternity test is unlikely to inquire about how the test was performed to discover potential injuries related to negligent or wrongful conduct in performing the test. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Terry v. Niblack
green
1 sentence2022Id. at 585 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Amanda v. Montgomery
green
1 sentence2021I object to Exhibit 29, and my objection—and my objection is I think the DNA testing is premature. [THE COURT]: That’s overruled. 2 We further note that the record does not indicate Mabvurunge objected to any prior order, including the May 23, 2019 order, for him to submit to genetic testing. –7– Thus, Mabvurunge failed to raise a legal objection to admission of the genetic testing result during trial.3 Nevertheless, Mabvurunge directs us to Amanda v. Montgomery in his briefing to argue that the paternity test results were “fruit of the poisonous tree” and, therefore, inadmissible. 877 S.W.2d | 1 | 2021–2021 |
In Re Rodriguez
green
1 sentence2017In re Rodriguez, 248 S.W.3d 444 (Tex. App.—Dallas 2008, orig. proceeding). | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Holley v. Adams
green
1 sentence2016As to his failure to complete the paternity test, he simply stated, “I didn’t want to go do that.” See id. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Brown v. Edwards Transfer Co., Inc.
green
1 sentence2014The relators do not fall within the catego- *653 ríes of individuals with standing under the Family Code to challenge Stoker’s acknowledgment. 2 Effect of an acknowledgment of paternity under the Wrongful Death Act Nevertheless, the relators argue that they have standing to make a paternity challenge under the Wrongful Death Act, relying on the Texas Supreme Court’s decisions in Brown v. Edwards Transfer Co., 764 S.W.2d 220 (Tex.1988) and Garza v. Maverick Market, Inc., 768 S.W.2d 273 (Tex.1989). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Garza v. Maverick Market, Inc.
green
1 sentence2014The relators do not fall within the catego- *653 ríes of individuals with standing under the Family Code to challenge Stoker’s acknowledgment. 2 Effect of an acknowledgment of paternity under the Wrongful Death Act Nevertheless, the relators argue that they have standing to make a paternity challenge under the Wrongful Death Act, relying on the Texas Supreme Court’s decisions in Brown v. Edwards Transfer Co., 764 S.W.2d 220 (Tex.1988) and Garza v. Maverick Market, Inc., 768 S.W.2d 273 (Tex.1989). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
In Re KMS
green
1 sentence2013Id. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Robinson v. Crown Cork & Seal Co., Inc.
green
1 sentence2011Robinson, 335 S.W.3d at 145-46 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
In Re Attorney General of Texas
green
1 sentence2007Cf. In re Attorney Gen. of Tex., 195 S.W.3d 264 , 266 n. 2 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2006, orig. proceeding) (observing that genetic test results were inadmissible under section 160.621(c) because mother did not consent to genetic testing, and trial court did not order genetic testing). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.