estate privilege (Iowa) · Go Syfert
← Iowa issues

estate privilege in Iowa

14 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1933–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

CaseFollowedCited
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Richard R. Schmidtgreen
iowa · 2011 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016See Iowa Supreme Ct. Att’y Disciplinary Bd. v. Schmidt, 796 N.W.2d 33 , 39–40 (Iowa 2011).

2016See Iowa Supreme Ct. Att’y Disciplinary Bd. v. Schmidt, 796 N.W.2d 33 , 39–40 (Iowa 2011).

22
Danny Homan, Rich Taylor, Jerry Kearns, Mark Smith, Thomas Courtney, Janet Petersen, Bruce Hunter, Curt Hanson, Tony Bisignano, Herman Quirmbach, Dick Dearden, Art Staed, Ako Abdul-Samad, Jo Oldson, Ruth Ann Gaines, Sharon Steckman, Todd Taylor, Mary Gaskill, Kirsten Running-Marquardt, Timi Brown-Powers, Dave Jacoby, Pam Jochum, Matt McCoy, Michael Gronstal, and Bruce Bearinger v. Terry E. Branstadgreen
iowa · 2016 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
1 sentence

2018“Summary judgment is appropriate only when the moving party has demonstrated there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Homan v. Branstad, 887 N.W.2d 153, 163-64 (Iowa 2016); see also Iowa R.

11
Matter of Estate of Witzkegreen
iowa · 1984 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
1 sentence

2004Cf In re Estate of Witzke, 359 N.W.2d 183, 185 (Iowa 1984) (affirming district court’s refusal to reopen estate without addressing merits of underlying fraud claim petitioner sought to assert against administrator of estate).

11
Godar v. Edwardsgreen
iowa · 1999 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
1 sentence

2004Because we find the Estate’s injuries arose out of and in the course of employment, we likewise hold the exclusivity provision of the IWCA bars recovery. *680 In Godar v. Edwards, we recognized a cause of action for negligent supervision. 588 N.W.2d 701, 709 (Iowa 1999).

11
Northwestern Land & Investment Co. v. Ostremgreen
· 1924 · cited in 1 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 1952–1952
1 sentence

1952See In re Estate of Fatland, 197 Iowa 1231, 1236 , 198 N.W. 785 , and citations; annotation 78 A. L.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (13)

CaseCitedYears
Miller's Ex'rs v. Miller green
kyctapphigh · 1949
2 sentences

1962Whitehill v. Whitehill, 211 Iowa 475, 476 , 233 N.W. 748 ; Milner v. Brokhausen, 153 Iowa 560 , 133 N.W. 1068 ; Miller’s Executrix v. Miller, 310 Ky. 721 , 221 S.W.2d 654 ; Croasdale v. Butell, 177 Kan. 487 , 280 P.2d 593 , 49 A. L.

1962Whitehill v. Whitehill, 211 Iowa 475, 476 , 233 N.W. 748 ; Milner v. Brokhausen, 153 Iowa 560 , 133 N.W. 1068 ; Miller’s Executrix v. Miller, 310 Ky. 721 , 221 S.W.2d 654 ; Croasdale v. Butell, 177 Kan. 487 , 280 P.2d 593 , 49 A. L.

21962–1962
Whitehill v. Whitehill green
iowa · 1930
2 sentences

1962Whitehill v. Whitehill, 211 Iowa 475, 476 , 233 N.W. 748 ; Milner v. Brokhausen, 153 Iowa 560 , 133 N.W. 1068 ; Miller’s Executrix v. Miller, 310 Ky. 721 , 221 S.W.2d 654 ; Croasdale v. Butell, 177 Kan. 487 , 280 P.2d 593 , 49 A. L.

1962Whitehill v. Whitehill, 211 Iowa 475, 476 , 233 N.W. 748 ; Milner v. Brokhausen, 153 Iowa 560 , 133 N.W. 1068 ; Miller’s Executrix v. Miller, 310 Ky. 721 , 221 S.W.2d 654 ; Croasdale v. Butell, 177 Kan. 487 , 280 P.2d 593 , 49 A. L.

21962–1962
Croasdale v. Butell neutral
kan · 1955
2 sentences

1962Whitehill v. Whitehill, 211 Iowa 475, 476 , 233 N.W. 748 ; Milner v. Brokhausen, 153 Iowa 560 , 133 N.W. 1068 ; Miller’s Executrix v. Miller, 310 Ky. 721 , 221 S.W.2d 654 ; Croasdale v. Butell, 177 Kan. 487 , 280 P.2d 593 , 49 A. L.

1962Whitehill v. Whitehill, 211 Iowa 475, 476 , 233 N.W. 748 ; Milner v. Brokhausen, 153 Iowa 560 , 133 N.W. 1068 ; Miller’s Executrix v. Miller, 310 Ky. 721 , 221 S.W.2d 654 ; Croasdale v. Butell, 177 Kan. 487 , 280 P.2d 593 , 49 A. L.

21962–1962
Milner v. Brokhausen neutral
iowa · 1912
2 sentences

1962Whitehill v. Whitehill, 211 Iowa 475, 476 , 233 N.W. 748 ; Milner v. Brokhausen, 153 Iowa 560 , 133 N.W. 1068 ; Miller’s Executrix v. Miller, 310 Ky. 721 , 221 S.W.2d 654 ; Croasdale v. Butell, 177 Kan. 487 , 280 P.2d 593 , 49 A. L.

1962Whitehill v. Whitehill, 211 Iowa 475, 476 , 233 N.W. 748 ; Milner v. Brokhausen, 153 Iowa 560 , 133 N.W. 1068 ; Miller’s Executrix v. Miller, 310 Ky. 721 , 221 S.W.2d 654 ; Croasdale v. Butell, 177 Kan. 487 , 280 P.2d 593 , 49 A. L.

21962–1962
Jordan v. Hunnell green
iowa · 1895
2 sentences

1995Id. at 339 , 65 N.W. at 304 .

1995Id. at 339 , 65 N.W. at 304 .

11995–1995
Monticello State Bank v. Brown green
iowa · 1981
1 sentence

1984Id. at 74 .

11984–1984
Perigo v. Perigo green
neb · 1954
2 sentences

1962Whitehill v. Whitehill, 211 Iowa 475, 476 , 233 N. W. 748 ; Milner v. Brokhausen, 153 Iowa 560 , 133 N.W. 1068 ; Miller's Executrix v. Miller, 310 Ky. 721 , 221 S.W.2d 654 ; Croasdale v. Butell, 177 Kan. 487 , 280 P.2d 593 , 49 A.L.R.2d 1112 ; Perigo v. Perigo, 158 Neb. 733 , 64 N.W.2d 789 ; 31 C.J.S.

1962Whitehill v. Whitehill, 211 Iowa 475, 476 , 233 N. W. 748 ; Milner v. Brokhausen, 153 Iowa 560 , 133 N.W. 1068 ; Miller's Executrix v. Miller, 310 Ky. 721 , 221 S.W.2d 654 ; Croasdale v. Butell, 177 Kan. 487 , 280 P.2d 593 , 49 A.L.R.2d 1112 ; Perigo v. Perigo, 158 Neb. 733 , 64 N.W.2d 789 ; 31 C.J.S.

11962–1962
In Re Estate of Parish green
iowa · 1945
2 sentences

1950Fisher v. Koontz, 110 Iowa 498, 500 , 80 N.W. 551 ; Rankin v. Schiereck, 166 Iowa 10, 15 , 147 N.W. 180 ; In re Estate of Parish, 236 Iowa 822, 831 , 20 N.W.2d 32, 36 ; 26 Am.

1950Fisher v. Koontz, 110 Iowa 498, 500 , 80 N.W. 551 ; Rankin v. Schiereck, 166 Iowa 10, 15 , 147 N.W. 180 ; In re Estate of Parish, 236 Iowa 822, 831 , 20 N.W.2d 32, 36 ; 26 Am.

11950–1950
Fisher v. Koontz green
iowa · 1899
2 sentences

1950Fisher v. Koontz, 110 Iowa 498, 500 , 80 N.W. 551 ; Rankin v. Schiereck, 166 Iowa 10, 15 , 147 N.W. 180 ; In re Estate of Parish, 236 Iowa 822, 831 , 20 N.W.2d 32, 36 ; 26 Am.

1950Fisher v. Koontz, 110 Iowa 498, 500 , 80 N.W. 551 ; Rankin v. Schiereck, 166 Iowa 10, 15 , 147 N.W. 180 ; In re Estate of Parish, 236 Iowa 822, 831 , 20 N.W.2d 32, 36 ; 26 Am.

11950–1950
Rankin v. Schiereck green
iowa · 1914
1 sentence

1950Fisher v. Koontz, 110 Iowa 498, 500 , 80 N.W. 551 ; Rankin v. Schiereck, 166 Iowa 10, 15 , 147 N.W. 180 ; In re Estate of Parish, 236 Iowa 822, 831 , 20 N.W.2d 32, 36 ; 26 Am.

11950–1950
Jenkinson v. New York Finance Co. green
njch · 1911
1 sentence

1944Eq. 247, 82 A. 36 , that court held that the assignee from a trust beneficiary who was a debtor to the estate could not claim a beneficial interest without discharging the debt.

11944–1944
Davidson v. Vorse neutral
iowa · 1879
2 sentences

1941We held in Davidson v. Vorse, 52 Iowa 384 , 3 N. W. 477 , if a claim on a note is filed against an estate and the claim is resisted claimant has commenced an action within the meaning of the statute.

1941We held in Davidson v. Vorse, 52 Iowa 384 , 3 N. W. 477 , if a claim on a note is filed against an estate and the claim is resisted claimant has commenced an action within the meaning of the statute.

11941–1941
McNett & McNett v. Bonnifield green
iowa · 1929
2 sentences

1933In re Estate of Leighton, 210 Iowa 913 , 224 N. W. 543 .

1933In re Estate of Leighton, 210 Iowa 913 , 224 N. W. 543 .

11933–1933

Where else courts name it

PA 231 (1901–2026) IN 60 (1900–2026) IL 48 (1903–2025) TX 39 (1919–2026) NY 37 (1877–2025) OH 33 (1943–2026) CA 26 (1874–2026) FL 25 (1940–2025) WA 23 (1910–2026) MS 18 (1948–2023) GA 18 (1961–2025) KY 17 (1939–2025) WI 16 (1933–2026) MO 15 (1890–2018) IA 14 (1933–2018) KS 12 (1888–2024) MT 12 (1897–2023) AL 11 (1884–2017) MD 11 (1920–2025) CT 11 (1926–2025) SD 11 (1926–2024) NE 9 (1957–2025) TN 9 (1917–2019) OK 9 (1913–2000) CO 9 (1960–2018) NM 9 (1995–2025) ME 8 (1951–2021) AR 8 (1896–2024) AZ 8 (1996–2026) NJ 7 (1907–2026) SC 7 (1999–2023) VA 6 (1795–2020) OR 6 (1926–1987) DE 5 (2021–2026) UT 5 (1912–2023) ID 5 (1925–2025) ND 5 (1932–2025) MN 5 (1938–2012) HI 4 (1955–2026) VI 4 (1960–2015) MA 4 (1929–2003) NC 3 (1928–2015) LA 3 (1990–2007) NH 3 (2015–2017) WY 3 (1982–2010) MI 3 (2010–2018) NV 3 (1959–2017) WV 3 (2008–2024) VT 2 (1872–2018) DC 2 (2008–2021) RI 2 (1990–2000) AK 2 (1995–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check