Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Virginia opinions name it 3 courts 1795–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Askew v. . Koonce
green
2 sentences1795Copeland v. Copeland (Va.), 24 S. E. 1795Copeland v. Copeland (Va.), 24 S. E. | 3 | 1795–1795 |
Chalkley v. Nolde Bros.
green
1 sentence2020In Chalkley, a twelve-year-old boy was injured while riding in a truck driven by an employee of Nolde, who had engaged Chalkley to assist him with deliveries. 186 Va. at 902-03 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Alcoy v. Valley Nursing Homes, Inc.
green
1 sentence2015This question was answered in Alcoy v. Valley Nursing Homes, Inc., 272 Va. 37 (2006), where the Supreme Court of Virginia reversed the trial court’s decision to grant summary judgment for a nursing home claiming that the decedent’s estate claim of negligence must be brought under the aforementioned Medical Malpractice Act. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Stottlemyer v. Ghramm
green
2 sentences2006Such evidence could reasonably be expected to have "excited prejudice and misled the jurors." Stottlemyer, 268 Va. at 12 , 597 S.E.2d at 194 . 2006Such evidence could reasonably be expected to have "excited prejudice and misled the jurors." Stottlemyer, 268 Va. at 12 , 597 S.E.2d at 194 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.