estate claim in Missouri

1997Id.

1997Id.

1997Id. at 892 .

1997Id. at 892 .

2018The Estate appealed, and eventually, in Gaither v. Bd. of Claims, 161 S.W.3d 345 (Ky. App. 2004), the Court of Appeals considered an intervening decision by this Court; overruled Gray in light of that decision; and deemed the Estate's claim timely, because it was filed within one year of the personal representative's appointment and within two years of the decedent's death.

2018Cabinet, Dep't of Highways, 981 S.W.2d 140 (Ky. App. 1998), the circuit court denied the Estate's motion for interest.

2018Safety Cabinet, 447 S.W.3d at 628 , that (1) reversed the lower courts' determination that KSP is immune from the Estate's claim, thus reinstating the Board's award; but (2) simultaneously reduced that award so as to bring it into conformity with the parties' stipulations.

2005Id.

2000In Department of Social Services v. Ragsdale, 934 S.W.2d at 324 , the Eastern District held that even if the computer records or the treasurer’s statement offered by the State are disregarded as exhibits, the properly admitted testimony of a Department of Social Services employee as to the amount the state had expended for decedent, if believed, was sufficient to establish the “moneys expended” for decedent as required by section 473.398.4.

1995In its brief, MBI states, “the determination of whether or not a proposed compromise is in the best interest of the estate requires an assessment of ‘the variable factors involving risk to the assets of the estate if the claim is not compromised.’ ” (emphasis added) (quoting Smith, 747 S.W.2d at 747 ).

1991Id. at 379 .

1988Basler, Estate of v. Delassus, supra. Applying that standard here, the variable factors impacting on the risk to the estate involved in seeking to collect more than the compromise amount of the claim, include the certainty or uncertainty of the amount of the claim against Beatrice, the estate’s ability to collect the claim from the debtor, and the time and expense involved in collecting the note if there is no compromise.

1941In Jamison v. Wells (Mo.), 7 S.W.2d 347 , 348[6], we said, citing cases: "Although the instrument under which color of title is claimed may be actually void and convey no title, if it purports on its face to convey the title to the land in question by appropriate words of transfer it will constitute color of title." Henrietta Spears (and her devisee) held possession of the whole of the real estate under claim of title and color of title subsequent to 1894. [Consult Allen v. Mansfield, 108 Mo. 343 , 348, 18 S.W. 901 , 903; Harriss v. Howard, 126 Ga. 325 , 330, 55 S.E. 59, 61 .] The homestead la

1941In Jamison v. Wells (Mo.), 7 S.W.2d 347 , 348[6], we said, citing cases: "Although the instrument under which color of title is claimed may be actually void and convey no title, if it purports on its face to convey the title to the land in question by appropriate words of transfer it will constitute color of title." Henrietta Spears (and her devisee) held possession of the whole of the real estate under claim of title and color of title subsequent to 1894. [Consult Allen v. Mansfield, 108 Mo. 343 , 348, 18 S.W. 901 , 903; Harriss v. Howard, 126 Ga. 325 , 330, 55 S.E. 59, 61 .] The homestead la

1941In Jamison v. Wells (Mo.), 7 S.W.2d 347 , 348[6], we said, citing cases: "Although the instrument under which color of title is claimed may be actually void and convey no title, if it purports on its face to convey the title to the land in question by appropriate words of transfer it will constitute color of title." Henrietta Spears (and her devisee) held possession of the whole of the real estate under claim of title and color of title subsequent to 1894. [Consult Allen v. Mansfield, 108 Mo. 343 , 348, 18 S.W. 901 , 903; Harriss v. Howard, 126 Ga. 325 , 330, 55 S.E. 59, 61 .] The homestead la

1914(Waddle v. Frazier, 245 Mo. 391, 404 ; Bradley v. Goff, 243 Mo. 95 ), which occurred within three years next before the commencement of this suit.

1914(Waddle v. Frazier, 245 Mo. 391, 404 ; Bradley v. Goff, 243 Mo. 95 ), which occurred within three years next before the commencement of this suit.

1904Though we may gather from the face of the will that the testator had a certain purpose in view, yet, unless he has expressed that purposei in terms that the court can enforce without violation of established principles of law, the testator’s intention can not be carried out. [Harbison v. Swan, 58 Mo. 147 .] The testator devised this property to the trustee for the sole use of his son for life, and declared that at his son’s death the trust should cease.

1890The court did not refer to the case of Sauer v. Griffin, 67 Mo. 654 , which involved the identical question, except that in the latter case the surety did not pay the debt until after final settlement of the estate and the suit was against the heirs of decedent and not against the administrator.