9 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1917–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Michelle RYE Et Al. v. WOMEN’S CARE CENTER OF MEMPHIS, MPLLC Et Al.green2 sentences2019Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 264 (Tenn. 2015). 2019Rye v. Women's Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC , 477 S.W.3d 235 , 264 (Tenn. 2015). | 1 | 2 |
Douglas v. Estate of Robertsongreen1 sentence2017Douglas v. Estate of Robinson, 876 S.W.2d 95, 97 (Tenn. 1994). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Estate of Bootegreen1 sentence2014In re Estate of Boote, 198 S.W.3d 699, 719 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005). | 1 | 1 |
Woods v. Paschallgreen1 sentence2013Woods v. Paschall, 547 S.W.2d 575, 577 (Tenn. 1977); see Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 67-8-301 to 67-8-507 (2011 & Supp. 2012). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In the Matter of ESTATE OF John J. GOZA
green
2 sentences2014Id. 2014Id. | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Smith v. Graves
green
1 sentence2009The trial court correctly found that under the authority of Smith, 672 S.W.2d at 790 , Dr. Casey’s affidavit as a defendant physician in a medical malpractice suit was sufficient by itself to support summary judgment in that he was competent to testify in his own case. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Logan v. Winstead
green
2 sentences2001In response, this Court entered an order in August 2000, remanding the matter to the Chancery Court for consideration of Chandler’s habeas corpus motion in light of a recent opinion by our Supreme Court, Logan v. Winstead, 23 S.W.3d 297 (Tenn. 2000), and ordering the Chancery Court not to close the Estate until the habeas corpus issue was decided.2 The Chancery Court issued a Notice in which it requested Chandler answer a series of questions related to his habeas corpus motion. 2001In response, this Court entered an order in August 2000, remanding the matter to the Chancery Court for consideration of Chandler’s habeas corpus motion in light of a recent opinion by our Supreme Court, Logan v. Winstead, 23 S.W.3d 297 (Tenn. 2000), and ordering the Chancery Court not to close the Estate until the habeas corpus issue was decided.2 The Chancery Court issued a Notice in which it requested Chandler answer a series of questions related to his habeas corpus motion. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Weed's Estate
neutral
2 sentences1917Analogous cases are Weed’s Estate, Appeal of McGinnis, 163 Pa., 595 , 30 Atl., 272 ; Seminary v. Botto, 117 Ky., 962 , 80 S. W., 177 . 1917Analogous cases are Weed’s Estate, Appeal of McGinnis, 163 Pa., 595 , 30 Atl., 272 ; Seminary v. Botto, 117 Ky., 962 , 80 S. W., 177 . | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Louisville Presbyterian Theo. Sem. v. Botto
neutral
1 sentence1917Analogous cases are Weed’s Estate, Appeal of McGinnis, 163 Pa., 595 , 30 Atl., 272 ; Seminary v. Botto, 117 Ky., 962 , 80 S. W., 177 . | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.