Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2021 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Aldapegreen2 sentences1986State v. Aldape, 307 N.W.2d 32, 35 (Iowa 1981); In the Interest of J.A.N., 346 N.W.2d 495, 498-99 (Iowa 1984). 1984In the Interest of J.A.N., 346 N.W.2d 495, 498 (Iowa 1984); State v. Aldape, 307 N.W.2d 32, 35 (Iowa 1981) (dictum). | 2 | 2 |
In the Interest of J.A.N.green2 sentences1986State v. Aldape, 307 N.W.2d 32, 35 (Iowa 1981); In the Interest of J.A.N., 346 N.W.2d 495, 498-99 (Iowa 1984). 1984In the Interest of J.A.N., 346 N.W.2d 495, 498 (Iowa 1984); State v. Aldape, 307 N.W.2d 32, 35 (Iowa 1981) (dictum). | 2 | 2 |
State of Iowa v. Kenneth Lee Madsengreen2 sentences2021We elaborated that the “use of a per se exclusionary rule eliminates the need for the court to attempt to read the mind of defendant to determine if his confession, in fact, was induced by or made in reliance upon the promise of leniency.” Id. at 726 . 2021We elaborated that the “use of a per se exclusionary rule eliminates the need for the court to attempt to read the mind of defendant to determine if his confession, in fact, was induced by or made in reliance upon the promise of leniency.” Id. at 726 . | 1 | 6 |
Schneckloth v. Bustamontegreen2 sentences2005Under the federal totality-of-the-circumstances test, the courts look at. “both .the characteristics of the accused and the details of the interrogation.” Schneckloth v. Bustamante, 412 U.S. 218, 226 , 93 S.Ct. 2041, 2047 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854, 862 (1973). 2005Under the federal totality-of-the-circumstances test, the courts look at. “both .the characteristics of the accused and the details of the interrogation.” Schneckloth v. Bustamante, 412 U.S. 218, 226 , 93 S.Ct. 2041, 2047 , 36 L.Ed.2d 854, 862 (1973). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Kelleygreen2 sentences1976The per se exclusionary rule was rejected by the Iowa court in State v. Kelley, 253 Iowa 1314, 1324 , 115 N.W.2d 184, 190 (1962), although the case loses prece-dential value because minority then existed to age 21 and Kelley was 20 years of age. 1976The per se exclusionary rule was rejected by the Iowa court in State v. Kelley, 253 Iowa 1314, 1324 , 115 N.W.2d 184, 190 (1962), although the case loses prece-dential value because minority then existed to age 21 and Kelley was 20 years of age. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kirby v. Illinois
green
2 sentences2016Id. at 689–90, 92 S. Ct. at 1882–83, 32 L. 2016Id. at 689–90, 92 S. Ct. at 1882–83, 32 L. | 3 | 2016–2016 |
State of Iowa v. Anthony Devon Polk
green
1 sentence2012And, as we noted in Polk , “The rule suppressing confessions tainted by promises of leniency deters police from using a tactic that might induce the innocent to confess falsely.” Polk, 812 N.W.2d at 674 (citing 2 Wayne R. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Gilbert v. California
green
2 sentences1973Less than a year after Wade (U.S. v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 ) and Gilbert (Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 ) were decided, the Court explained the rule of those decisions as follows: ‘The rationale of those cases was that an accused is entitled to counsel at any “critical stage of the prosecution", and that a post-indictment lineup is such a “critical stage”.’ (citations) We decline to depart from that rationale today by imposing a per se exclusionary rule upon testimony concerning an identification that took place long before 1973Less than a year after Wade (U.S. v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 ) and Gilbert (Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 ) were decided, the Court explained the rule of those decisions as follows: ‘The rationale of those cases was that an accused is entitled to counsel at any “critical stage of the prosecution", and that a post-indictment lineup is such a “critical stage”.’ (citations) We decline to depart from that rationale today by imposing a per se exclusionary rule upon testimony concerning an identification that took place long before | 1 | 1973–1973 |
United States v. Wade
green
2 sentences1973Less than a year after Wade (U.S. v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 ) and Gilbert (Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 ) were decided, the Court explained the rule of those decisions as follows: ‘The rationale of those cases was that an accused is entitled to counsel at any “critical stage of the prosecution", and that a post-indictment lineup is such a “critical stage”.’ (citations) We decline to depart from that rationale today by imposing a per se exclusionary rule upon testimony concerning an identification that took place long before 1973Less than a year after Wade (U.S. v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 ) and Gilbert (Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 ) were decided, the Court explained the rule of those decisions as follows: ‘The rationale of those cases was that an accused is entitled to counsel at any “critical stage of the prosecution", and that a post-indictment lineup is such a “critical stage”.’ (citations) We decline to depart from that rationale today by imposing a per se exclusionary rule upon testimony concerning an identification that took place long before | 1 | 1973–1973 |
United States v. Ash
green
2 sentences1973Less than a year after Wade (U.S. v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 ) and Gilbert (Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 ) were decided, the Court explained the rule of those decisions as follows: ‘The rationale of those cases was that an accused is entitled to counsel at any “critical stage of the prosecution", and that a post-indictment lineup is such a “critical stage”.’ (citations) We decline to depart from that rationale today by imposing a per se exclusionary rule upon testimony concerning an identification that took place long before 1973Less than a year after Wade (U.S. v. Wade, 388 U.S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 ) and Gilbert (Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 ) were decided, the Court explained the rule of those decisions as follows: ‘The rationale of those cases was that an accused is entitled to counsel at any “critical stage of the prosecution", and that a post-indictment lineup is such a “critical stage”.’ (citations) We decline to depart from that rationale today by imposing a per se exclusionary rule upon testimony concerning an identification that took place long before | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.