Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Rhode Island opinions name it 1 courts 1973–1999 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Rhode Island courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Stovall v. Dennogreen2 sentences1973The defendant claims that the trial justice’s refusal tó permit that hearing ignored the basic principles enunciated in the “lineup” cases — Simmons v. United States, 390 U. S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Gilbert v. California, 388 U. S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967); Stovall v. Denno, 388 U. S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967); United States v. Wade, 388 U. S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967). 2 *343 There is no need to examine all of these principles, it being sufficient for our purposes to observe that this case is controlled by the pe 1973The defendant claims that the trial justice’s refusal tó permit that hearing ignored the basic principles enunciated in the “lineup” cases — Simmons v. United States, 390 U. S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Gilbert v. California, 388 U. S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967); Stovall v. Denno, 388 U. S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967); United States v. Wade, 388 U. S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967). 2 *343 There is no need to examine all of these principles, it being sufficient for our purposes to observe that this case is controlled by the pe | 1 | 2 |
State v. Delahuntgreen2 sentences1989Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 302 , 87 S.Ct. 1967, 1972 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199, 1206 (1967); State v. Delahunt, 121 R.I. 565, 573 , 401 A.2d 1261, 1265 (1979). 1989Stovall v. Denno, 388 U.S. 293, 302 , 87 S.Ct. 1967, 1972 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199, 1206 (1967); State v. Delahunt, 121 R.I. 565, 573 , 401 A.2d 1261, 1265 (1979). | 1 | 2 |
State v. Turnergreen2 sentences1999Because an inflexible rule prohibiting such procedures would “frustrate rather than promote justice,” id., we review an identification that may be suggestive to ascertain whether it might be reliable despite its potentially suggestive nature. 1999“Even though [show-up identification procedures] have been widely condemned, both the United States Supreme Court and [this Court] have refused to create a per-se exclusionary rule barring the use of evidence of out-of-court identifications in situations in which suspects are shown individually to witnesses for the purpose of identification.” State v. Turner, 561 A.2d 869, 871 (R.I.1989). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Rhode Island. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gilbert v. California
green
2 sentences1979As we noted in Ragonesi , the per se exclusionary rule announced in Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S. Ct. 1951 , 18 L. 1979As we noted in Ragonesi , the per se exclusionary rule announced in Gilbert v. California, 388 U.S. 263 , 87 S. Ct. 1951 , 18 L. | 3 | 1973–1979 |
Kirby v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1981We decline to depart from that rationale today by imposing a per se exclusionary rule upon testimony concerning an identification that took place long before the commencement of any prosecution whatever.” (Footnote omitted.) [Citations omitted.] Id., 406 U.S. at 689-90 , 92 S.Ct. at 1882-83 , 32 L.Ed.2d at 418 . 1981We decline to depart from that rationale today by imposing a per se exclusionary rule upon testimony concerning an identification that took place long before the commencement of any prosecution whatever.” (Footnote omitted.) [Citations omitted.] Id., 406 U.S. at 689-90 , 92 S.Ct. at 1882-83 , 32 L.Ed.2d at 418 . | 2 | 1979–1981 |
Simmons v. United States
green
2 sentences1981We decline to depart from that rationale today by imposing a per se exclusionary rule upon testimony concerning an identification that took place long before the commencement of any prosecution whatever.” (Footnote omitted.) [Citations omitted.] Id., 406 U.S. at 689-90 , 92 S.Ct. at 1882-83 , 32 L.Ed.2d at 418 . 1973The defendant claims that the trial justice’s refusal tó permit that hearing ignored the basic principles enunciated in the “lineup” cases — Simmons v. United States, 390 U. S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Gilbert v. California, 388 U. S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967); Stovall v. Denno, 388 U. S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967); United States v. Wade, 388 U. S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967). 2 *343 There is no need to examine all of these principles, it being sufficient for our purposes to observe that this case is controlled by the pe | 2 | 1973–1981 |
State v. Ragonesi
green
2 sentences1977We have discussed application of that rule in State v. Ragonesi, 112 R.I. 340 , 309 A.2d 851 (1973), where this court said: “Essentially, that rule states that the prosecution may not as part of its direct case bolster an in-court identification with testimony of a pre-trial extrajudicial identification at which the accused was denied the right to counsel or due process. 1977We have discussed application of that rule in State v. Ragonesi, 112 R.I. 340 , 309 A.2d 851 (1973), where this court said: “Essentially, that rule states that the prosecution may not as part of its direct case bolster an in-court identification with testimony of a pre-trial extrajudicial identification at which the accused was denied the right to counsel or due process. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
United States v. Wade
green
2 sentences1973The defendant claims that the trial justice’s refusal tó permit that hearing ignored the basic principles enunciated in the “lineup” cases — Simmons v. United States, 390 U. S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Gilbert v. California, 388 U. S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967); Stovall v. Denno, 388 U. S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967); United States v. Wade, 388 U. S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967). 2 *343 There is no need to examine all of these principles, it being sufficient for our purposes to observe that this case is controlled by the pe 1973The defendant claims that the trial justice’s refusal tó permit that hearing ignored the basic principles enunciated in the “lineup” cases — Simmons v. United States, 390 U. S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 (1968); Gilbert v. California, 388 U. S. 263 , 87 S.Ct. 1951 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1178 (1967); Stovall v. Denno, 388 U. S. 293 , 87 S.Ct. 1967 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1199 (1967); United States v. Wade, 388 U. S. 218 , 87 S.Ct. 1926 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1149 (1967). 2 *343 There is no need to examine all of these principles, it being sufficient for our purposes to observe that this case is controlled by the pe | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.