Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rock v. Arkansasgreen2 sentences2004See Rock, 483 U.S. 44 , 107 S.Ct. 2704 , 97 L.Ed.2d 37 (holding a per se exclusionary rule banning hypnotically refreshed testimony of defendants testifying on their own behalf unconstitutional under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution). 2004See Rock, 483 U.S. 44 , 107 S.Ct. 2704 , 97 L.Ed.2d 37 (holding a per se exclusionary rule banning hypnotically refreshed testimony of defendants testifying on their own behalf unconstitutional under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution). | 2 | 2 |
Neil v. Biggersgreen1 sentence2022Perry, 565 U.S. at 724. 8 Rather, we are “to assess, on a case-by-case basis, whether improper police conduct created a ‘substantial likelihood of misidentification.’” Id. (quoting Neil v. Biggers, 409 U.S. 188, 201 (1972)). | 1 | 1 |
Webb v. Stategreen1 sentence2003Trial courts should perform the balancing test set out in Webb v. State, 766 S.W.2d 236, 244 (Tex.Crim.App.1989). 34 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Manson v. Brathwaite
green
2 sentences1988However, in Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct. 2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977), the Supreme Court, in rejecting a per se exclusionary rule, de termined that reliability is the central issue in ascertaining the admissibility of identification testimony. 1988However, in Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct. 2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977), the Supreme Court, in rejecting a per se exclusionary rule, de termined that reliability is the central issue in ascertaining the admissibility of identification testimony. | 4 | 1980–1988 |
Contreras v. State
green
2 sentences2004Ibid. 2004Ibid. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Munguia v. State
green
1 sentence1985This sentiment was adopted by *721 the court in Munguia v. State, 603 S.W.2d 876 (Tex.Cr.App.1980). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Hurd
green
2 sentences1984However, in State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525 , 432 A.2d 86 (1981) (i.e. the guideline approach), the court reached a contrary conclusion and rejected the per se exclusionary rule. 1984However, in State v. Hurd, 86 N.J. 525 , 432 A.2d 86 (1981) (i.e. the guideline approach), the court reached a contrary conclusion and rejected the per se exclusionary rule. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.