Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
9 to 5 Fashions, Inc. v. Spurney
green
1 sentence2012Despite comments by Justice Calogero in his dissent that the majority was abandoning the rule, and the majority’s characterization in 9 to 5 Fashions, Inc., v. Spumey, 538 So.2d 228 (La.1989), of PPG as abrogating the per se exclusionary rule, Forcum-James has not been overruled. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
United States v. Adalberto Cervantes-Pacheco, Jerry Wayne Nelson and William E. Nelson
green
1 sentence1993The 1987 case of U.S. v. Cervantes-Pacheco, 826 F.2d 310 (5th Cir.1987), overruled Williamson v. U.S . and held that the use of a compensated witness is a credibility issue for the jury to determine and not the subject of a per se exclusionary rule. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Mims
green
1 sentence1991State v. Mims, 501 So.2d 962 (La.App. 2d Cir.1987). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Rock v. Arkansas
green
2 sentences1989Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44 , 107 S.Ct. 2704 , 97 L.Ed.2d 37 (1987). 1989Rock v. Arkansas, 483 U.S. 44 , 107 S.Ct. 2704 , 97 L.Ed.2d 37 (1987). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Pullin v. Louisiana State Racing Com'n
green
1 sentence1989We observed: "The appropriateness of extending the [exclusionary] rule to a particular proceeding is to be determined by the likely social benefits of excluding unlawfully seized evidence against the likely social costs." 484 So.2d at 106 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
United States v. Janis
green
2 sentences1989In Pullin , a plurality of this Court refused to apply the exclusionary rule in an administrative license revocation proceeding even though the evidence had been illegally seized by police officers. [9] Rather than impose a per se exclusionary rule on the admissibility of improperly obtained evidence in administrative proceedings, we adopted the balancing test developed by the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433 , 96 S.Ct. 3021 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1046 (1976). 1989In Pullin , a plurality of this Court refused to apply the exclusionary rule in an administrative license revocation proceeding even though the evidence had been illegally seized by police officers. [9] Rather than impose a per se exclusionary rule on the admissibility of improperly obtained evidence in administrative proceedings, we adopted the balancing test developed by the U.S. Supreme Court in United States v. Janis, 428 U.S. 433 , 96 S.Ct. 3021 , 49 L.Ed.2d 1046 (1976). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal
green
2 sentences1989In Rock v. Arkansas, supra , the court said: Logically included in the accused's right to call witnesses whose testimony is "material and favorable to his defense," United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal, 458 U.S. 858, 867 , 102 S.Ct. 3440, 3446 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1193 (1982), is a right to testify himself, should he decide it is in his favor to do so. 1989In Rock v. Arkansas, supra , the court said: Logically included in the accused's right to call witnesses whose testimony is "material and favorable to his defense," United States v. Valenzuela-Bernal, 458 U.S. 858, 867 , 102 S.Ct. 3440, 3446 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1193 (1982), is a right to testify himself, should he decide it is in his favor to do so. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.