Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1812–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Northcross v. Taylorgreen2 sentences1956See the authorities collected in Northcross v. Taylor, 29 Tenn.App. 438 , at pages 446 and 447, 197 S.W.2d 9 , at page 12, wherein it is said: "As heretofore indicated we think the Act and the Code Section are in conflict, but the Act being comprehensive and covering the whole subject, the Act stands by itself and all previous Acts are repealed whether in conflict or not. " See also: Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 . 1956See the authorities collected in Northcross v. Taylor, 29 Tenn.App. 438 , at pages 446 and 447, 197 S.W.2d 9 , at page 12, wherein it is said: "As heretofore indicated we think the Act and the Code Section are in conflict, but the Act being comprehensive and covering the whole subject, the Act stands by itself and all previous Acts are repealed whether in conflict or not. " See also: Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 . | 2 | 2 |
Bell v. Tallmangreen1 sentence1999Mr. Brown’s theory that the repeal of the Class X Felony Act made him eligible for “honor time” and good conduct credits under “revived” Tenn. Code Ann. §§ 41-332 (subsequently codified as Tenn. Code Ann. § 41-21-212 ) and 41-21-229 indicates a misconception of the law.1 It has long been the general rule that “a statute purporting to cover an entire subject repeals all former statutes upon the same subject, either with or without a repealing clause, and notwithstanding it may omit material provision of the earlier statutes.” Lellyett v. Brooks, 62 S.W. 596, 603 (Tenn. Ct. Ch. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Terrell v. State
neutral
2 sentences1961Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 3 S.W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S.W. 212 ; Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S.W. 296 ; Chattanooga v. Neeley, 97 Tenn. 527 , 37 S.W. 281 ; Maxwell v. Stuart, 99 Tenn. 409 , 42 S.W. 34 ; Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 104 Tenn. 277 , 57 S.W. 341 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S.W. 73 ; Malone v. Williams, 118 Tenn. 390 , 103 S.W. 798 , 121 Am. 1946Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 , 3 S. W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S. W. 212 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S. W. 296 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S. W. 73 ; Balden v. State, 122 Tenn. 704 , 127 S. W. 134 ; 25 R. | 4 | 1891–1961 |
Rodemer v. Mitchell
neutral
2 sentences1961Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 3 S.W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S.W. 212 ; Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S.W. 296 ; Chattanooga v. Neeley, 97 Tenn. 527 , 37 S.W. 281 ; Maxwell v. Stuart, 99 Tenn. 409 , 42 S.W. 34 ; Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 104 Tenn. 277 , 57 S.W. 341 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S.W. 73 ; Malone v. Williams, 118 Tenn. 390 , 103 S.W. 798 , 121 Am. 1956See the authorities collected in Northcross v. Taylor, 29 Tenn.App. 438 , at pages 446 and 447, 197 S.W.2d 9 , at page 12, wherein it is said: "As heretofore indicated we think the Act and the Code Section are in conflict, but the Act being comprehensive and covering the whole subject, the Act stands by itself and all previous Acts are repealed whether in conflict or not. " See also: Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 . | 4 | 1927–1961 |
Erwin v. State
neutral
2 sentences1961Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 3 S.W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S.W. 212 ; Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S.W. 296 ; Chattanooga v. Neeley, 97 Tenn. 527 , 37 S.W. 281 ; Maxwell v. Stuart, 99 Tenn. 409 , 42 S.W. 34 ; Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 104 Tenn. 277 , 57 S.W. 341 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S.W. 73 ; Malone v. Williams, 118 Tenn. 390 , 103 S.W. 798 , 121 Am. 1946Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 , 3 S. W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S. W. 212 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S. W. 296 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S. W. 73 ; Balden v. State, 122 Tenn. 704 , 127 S. W. 134 ; 25 R. | 4 | 1927–1961 |
Poe v. State
neutral
2 sentences1961Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 3 S.W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S.W. 212 ; Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S.W. 296 ; Chattanooga v. Neeley, 97 Tenn. 527 , 37 S.W. 281 ; Maxwell v. Stuart, 99 Tenn. 409 , 42 S.W. 34 ; Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 104 Tenn. 277 , 57 S.W. 341 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S.W. 73 ; Malone v. Williams, 118 Tenn. 390 , 103 S.W. 798 , 121 Am. 1961Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 3 S.W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S.W. 212 ; Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S.W. 296 ; Chattanooga v. Neeley, 97 Tenn. 527 , 37 S.W. 281 ; Maxwell v. Stuart, 99 Tenn. 409 , 42 S.W. 34 ; Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 104 Tenn. 277 , 57 S.W. 341 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S.W. 73 ; Malone v. Williams, 118 Tenn. 390 , 103 S.W. 798 , 121 Am. | 3 | 1927–1961 |
State v. Butcher
green
2 sentences1961Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 3 S.W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S.W. 212 ; Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S.W. 296 ; Chattanooga v. Neeley, 97 Tenn. 527 , 37 S.W. 281 ; Maxwell v. Stuart, 99 Tenn. 409 , 42 S.W. 34 ; Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 104 Tenn. 277 , 57 S.W. 341 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S.W. 73 ; Malone v. Williams, 118 Tenn. 390 , 103 S.W. 798 , 121 Am. 1961Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 3 S.W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S.W. 212 ; Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S.W. 296 ; Chattanooga v. Neeley, 97 Tenn. 527 , 37 S.W. 281 ; Maxwell v. Stuart, 99 Tenn. 409 , 42 S.W. 34 ; Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 104 Tenn. 277 , 57 S.W. 341 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S.W. 73 ; Malone v. Williams, 118 Tenn. 390 , 103 S.W. 798 , 121 Am. | 3 | 1927–1961 |
Balden v. State
neutral
2 sentences1946Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 , 3 S. W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S. W. 212 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S. W. 296 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S. W. 73 ; Balden v. State, 122 Tenn. 704 , 127 S. W. 134 ; 25 R. 1930Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. (1 Pick.), 495; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. (2 Pick.), 523; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. (9 Pick), 679; Irwin v., State, 116 Tenn., 71 ; Balden v. State, 122 Tenn., 704 ; 25 R. | 3 | 1927–1946 |
Chattanooga v. Neely
neutral
2 sentences1961Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 3 S.W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S.W. 212 ; Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S.W. 296 ; Chattanooga v. Neeley, 97 Tenn. 527 , 37 S.W. 281 ; Maxwell v. Stuart, 99 Tenn. 409 , 42 S.W. 34 ; Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 104 Tenn. 277 , 57 S.W. 341 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S.W. 73 ; Malone v. Williams, 118 Tenn. 390 , 103 S.W. 798 , 121 Am. 1961Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 3 S.W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S.W. 212 ; Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S.W. 296 ; Chattanooga v. Neeley, 97 Tenn. 527 , 37 S.W. 281 ; Maxwell v. Stuart, 99 Tenn. 409 , 42 S.W. 34 ; Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 104 Tenn. 277 , 57 S.W. 341 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S.W. 73 ; Malone v. Williams, 118 Tenn. 390 , 103 S.W. 798 , 121 Am. | 2 | 1927–1961 |
Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co.
green
2 sentences1961Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 3 S.W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S.W. 212 ; Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S.W. 296 ; Chattanooga v. Neeley, 97 Tenn. 527 , 37 S.W. 281 ; Maxwell v. Stuart, 99 Tenn. 409 , 42 S.W. 34 ; Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 104 Tenn. 277 , 57 S.W. 341 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S.W. 73 ; Malone v. Williams, 118 Tenn. 390 , 103 S.W. 798 , 121 Am. 1961Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 3 S.W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S.W. 212 ; Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S.W. 296 ; Chattanooga v. Neeley, 97 Tenn. 527 , 37 S.W. 281 ; Maxwell v. Stuart, 99 Tenn. 409 , 42 S.W. 34 ; Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 104 Tenn. 277 , 57 S.W. 341 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S.W. 73 ; Malone v. Williams, 118 Tenn. 390 , 103 S.W. 798 , 121 Am. | 2 | 1927–1961 |
Malone v. Williams
green
2 sentences1961Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 3 S.W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S.W. 212 ; Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S.W. 296 ; Chattanooga v. Neeley, 97 Tenn. 527 , 37 S.W. 281 ; Maxwell v. Stuart, 99 Tenn. 409 , 42 S.W. 34 ; Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 104 Tenn. 277 , 57 S.W. 341 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S.W. 73 ; Malone v. Williams, 118 Tenn. 390 , 103 S.W. 798 , 121 Am. 1927Poe v. State, 85 Tenn., 495 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn., 523 ; Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn., 65 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn., 679 ; Chattanooga v. Neeley, 97 Tenn., 527 ; Maxwell v. Stuart, 99 Tenn., 408 ; Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 104 Tenn., 277 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn., 71 ; Malone v. Williams, 118 Tenn., 390 ; Balden v. State, 122 Tenn., 704 ; Stonega Coke & Coal Co. v. Southern Steel Co., 123 Tenn., 428 ; Hurt v. Y. & M. | 2 | 1927–1961 |
Mowery v. State
green
1 sentence2017Moreover, “[n]o principle of law is better settled than that a statute purporting to cover an entire subject repeals all former statutes upon the same subject, either with or without a repealing clause, and notwithstanding it may omit material provisions of the earlier statutes.” Mowery v. State, 352 S.W.2d 435 , 5 The State’s contention that Steadman had not been cited on the issue of mandatory judicial recusal since it was decided is incorrect. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Metropolitan Government of Nashville v. Hillsboro Land Co.
green
2 sentences1972The repealing clause of Chapter 325 states: “An act with respect to the assessment of property for taxation and to repeal all statutes inconsistent herewith, including but not limited to Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 67-605.” This Court applied this clause in Metropolitan Government of Nashville v. Hillsboro Land Co., 222 Tenn. 431 , 436 S.W.2d 850 (1968), which held that repeals by implication are not favored, will be found only where there is manifest repugnance and irreconcilable conflict between statutes, and will not be found where any fair or reasonable construction will permit the s 1972The repealing clause of Chapter 325 states: “An act with respect to the assessment of property for taxation and to repeal all statutes inconsistent herewith, including but not limited to Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 67-605.” This Court applied this clause in Metropolitan Government of Nashville v. Hillsboro Land Co., 222 Tenn. 431 , 436 S.W.2d 850 (1968), which held that repeals by implication are not favored, will be found only where there is manifest repugnance and irreconcilable conflict between statutes, and will not be found where any fair or reasonable construction will permit the s | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Maxwell v. Stuart
green
2 sentences1961Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 3 S.W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S.W. 212 ; Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S.W. 296 ; Chattanooga v. Neeley, 97 Tenn. 527 , 37 S.W. 281 ; Maxwell v. Stuart, 99 Tenn. 409 , 42 S.W. 34 ; Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 104 Tenn. 277 , 57 S.W. 341 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S.W. 73 ; Malone v. Williams, 118 Tenn. 390 , 103 S.W. 798 , 121 Am. 1961Poe v. State, 85 Tenn. 495 3 S.W. 658 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn. 523 , 8 S.W. 212 ; Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn. 65 , 15 S.W. 1067 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn. 679 , 28 S.W. 296 ; Chattanooga v. Neeley, 97 Tenn. 527 , 37 S.W. 281 ; Maxwell v. Stuart, 99 Tenn. 409 , 42 S.W. 34 ; Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 104 Tenn. 277 , 57 S.W. 341 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn. 71 , 93 S.W. 73 ; Malone v. Williams, 118 Tenn. 390 , 103 S.W. 798 , 121 Am. | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Melton and Tanner v. State
green
2 sentences1946In Melton v. State, 160 Tenn. 273, 276 , 23 S. W. (2d) 662, 663 , it is said: “No principle of -the law is better settled than that a statute purporting to cover an entire subject repeals all former statutes upon the same subject, either with or without a repealing clause, and this notwithstanding the fact that it may omit material provisions of the earlier statutes. 1946In Melton v. State, 160 Tenn. 273, 276 , 23 S. W. (2d) 662, 663 , it is said: “No principle of -the law is better settled than that a statute purporting to cover an entire subject repeals all former statutes upon the same subject, either with or without a repealing clause, and this notwithstanding the fact that it may omit material provisions of the earlier statutes. | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Haley v. State
green
2 sentences1929In Haley v. State, 156 Tenn., 85 , 299 S. W., 799 , it is said “No principle of law is better settled than that a statute purporting to cover an entire subject repeals all former statutes upon the same subject, either with or without a repealing clause, and notwithstanding it may omit earlier provisions of the earlier statutes’’ — citing many Tennessee decisions, also 25 R. 1929In Haley v. State, 156 Tenn., 85 , 299 S. W., 799 , it is said “No principle of law is better settled than that a statute purporting to cover an entire subject repeals all former statutes upon the same subject, either with or without a repealing clause, and notwithstanding it may omit earlier provisions of the earlier statutes’’ — citing many Tennessee decisions, also 25 R. | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Stonega Coke & Coal Co. v. Southern Steel Co.
neutral
1 sentence1927Poe v. State, 85 Tenn., 495 ; Terrell v. State, 86 Tenn., 523 ; Rodemer v. Mitchell, 90 Tenn., 65 ; State v. Butcher, 93 Tenn., 679 ; Chattanooga v. Neeley, 97 Tenn., 527 ; Maxwell v. Stuart, 99 Tenn., 408 ; Zickler v. Union Bank & Trust Co., 104 Tenn., 277 ; Erwin v. State, 116 Tenn., 71 ; Malone v. Williams, 118 Tenn., 390 ; Balden v. State, 122 Tenn., 704 ; Stonega Coke & Coal Co. v. Southern Steel Co., 123 Tenn., 428 ; Hurt v. Y. & M. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Ridge Ave. Pass. Ry. Co. v. Philadelphia
neutral
1 sentence1925But as the matter actually stood, there was nothing to put them on inquiry or suggest the idea that a bill denoting an intention simply to regulate the railway, bore hardly on the city.” Ridge Avenue Passenger Railway Go. v. Philadelphia, 124 Pa., 219 , 16 A., 74 . | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Co.
green
1 sentence1907That section is still in force, as was expressly held in Jellenik v. Huron Copper Mining Co., 177 U. S. 1, 10 . | 1 | 1907–1907 |
Ogden, Administrator of Cornell v. Blackledge, of Salter
green
1 sentence1812Rep. 227 ; 2 Cranch, 272 . | 1 | 1812–1812 |
Ogden v. Witherspoon
neutral
1 sentence1812By making another act upon the same subject, the provisions of which are consistent with the first, but containing a repealing clause like the one in the present case. 2 Hay. | 1 | 1812–1812 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.