Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1922–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Berry v. Stategreen2 sentences2012See Berry v. State, 69 Tex. Crim. 602 , 156 S.W. 626, 635 (1913). 1911: Article 259. [247] Arrest without warrant, when.—A peace officer or any other person may, without warrant, arrest an offender when the offense is committed in his presence or within his view, if the offense is one classed as a felony, or as an "offense against the public peace." [O.C. 209.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 32d Leg., R.S., § 2, art. 259, 1911 Tex.Crim. 2012See Berry v. State, 69 Tex.Crim. 602 , 156 S.W. 626, 635 (1913). 1911: Article 259. [247] Arrest without warrant, when. — A peace officer or any other person may, without warrant, arrest an offender when the offense is committed in his presence or within his view, if the offense is one classed as a felony, or as an "offense against the public peace.” [O.C. 209.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 32d Leg., R.S., § 2, art. 259, 1911 Tex.Crim. | 3 | 3 |
Berry v. Stategreen2 sentences2012See Berry v. State, 69 Tex. Crim. 602 , 156 S.W. 626, 635 (1913). 1911: Article 259. [247] Arrest without warrant, when.—A peace officer or any other person may, without warrant, arrest an offender when the offense is committed in his presence or within his view, if the offense is one classed as a felony, or as an "offense against the public peace." [O.C. 209.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 32d Leg., R.S., § 2, art. 259, 1911 Tex.Crim. 2012See Berry v. State, 69 Tex.Crim. 602 , 156 S.W. 626, 635 (1913). 1911: Article 259. [247] Arrest without warrant, when. — A peace officer or any other person may, without warrant, arrest an offender when the offense is committed in his presence or within his view, if the offense is one classed as a felony, or as an "offense against the public peace.” [O.C. 209.] Code of Criminal Procedure, 32d Leg., R.S., § 2, art. 259, 1911 Tex.Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Pioneer Oil & Refining Co. v. Stategreen1 sentence1984Pioneer Oil & Refining Co. v. State, 273 S.W. 615, 616 (Tex. Civ.App. — Austin 1925), rev’d on other grounds, 292 S.W. 869 (Tex.Cr.App.1927). | 1 | 1 |
Robinson v. Bullockgreen1 sentence1980Robinson v. Bullock, 553 S.W.2d 196, 198 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1977, writ ref’d n.r. e.), cert. denied 436 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 2264 , 56 L.Ed.2d 759 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Pioneer Oil & Refining Co.
green
1 sentence1984Pioneer Oil & Refining Co. v. State, 273 S.W. 615, 616 (Tex. Civ.App. — Austin 1925), rev’d on other grounds, 292 S.W. 869 (Tex.Cr.App.1927). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Frisco Land & Mining Co. v. California
green
1 sentence1980Robinson v. Bullock, 553 S.W.2d 196, 198 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1977, writ ref’d n.r. e.), cert. denied 436 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 2264 , 56 L.Ed.2d 759 (1978). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Fox v. Kneip
green
1 sentence1980Robinson v. Bullock, 553 S.W.2d 196, 198 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1977, writ ref’d n.r. e.), cert. denied 436 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 2264 , 56 L.Ed.2d 759 (1978). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Robinson v. Bullock
green
1 sentence1980Robinson v. Bullock, 553 S.W.2d 196, 198 (Tex.Civ.App.—Austin 1977, writ ref’d n.r. e.), cert. denied 436 U.S. 918 , 98 S.Ct. 2264 , 56 L.Ed.2d 759 (1978). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Flowers v. Pecos River Railroad
green
1 sentence1961Flowers v. Pecos River Authority, 138 !I$. .ll, 156 S.W.2d 260 (1941); 39 Tex. Jur. 149, Statutes, Inthls particular instance, since Article 2832, Ve&on'i Civil Statutes, as amended~ln 1959, does not contain a repealing clause and Is general in nature, It Is the opinion of this office that an Independent school district may place proceeds from the sale of bonds, which are not Immediately needed, on secured Interest bearing time deposits with a state or national bank of this state obher than Its school district depository, SUMMARY An Independent school district may place proceeds from the sale | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Wilson v. Vick
neutral
2 sentences1922Wilson v. Vick, 93 Texas, 88, 91 , 53 S. W., 576 ; Anderson v. Engler, 184 S. W., 309 ; Yarbrough v. Collins, 91 Texas, 306, 308 , 42 S. W., 1052 ; and authorities supra. These authorities are directly in point, and leave no room for discussion as to the legislative effect of the repealing clause in the Revised Statutes of this State. 1922Wilson v. Vick, 93 Texas, 88, 91 , 53 S. W., 576 ; Anderson v. Engler, 184 S. W., 309 ; Yarbrough v. Collins, 91 Texas, 306, 308 , 42 S. W., 1052 ; and authorities supra. These authorities are directly in point, and leave no room for discussion as to the legislative effect of the repealing clause in the Revised Statutes of this State. | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Yarbrough v. Collins
neutral
1 sentence1922Wilson v. Vick, 93 Texas, 88, 91 , 53 S. W., 576 ; Anderson v. Engler, 184 S. W., 309 ; Yarbrough v. Collins, 91 Texas, 306, 308 , 42 S. W., 1052 ; and authorities supra. These authorities are directly in point, and leave no room for discussion as to the legislative effect of the repealing clause in the Revised Statutes of this State. | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Homes v. City of Henrietta
neutral
1 sentence1922Wilson v. Vick, 93 Texas, 88, 91 , 53 S. W., 576 ; Anderson v. Engler, 184 S. W., 309 ; Yarbrough v. Collins, 91 Texas, 306, 308 , 42 S. W., 1052 ; and authorities supra. These authorities are directly in point, and leave no room for discussion as to the legislative effect of the repealing clause in the Revised Statutes of this State. | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Anderson v. Engler
neutral
1 sentence1922Wilson v. Vick, 93 Texas, 88, 91 , 53 S. W., 576 ; Anderson v. Engler, 184 S. W., 309 ; Yarbrough v. Collins, 91 Texas, 306, 308 , 42 S. W., 1052 ; and authorities supra. These authorities are directly in point, and leave no room for discussion as to the legislative effect of the repealing clause in the Revised Statutes of this State. | 1 | 1922–1922 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.