Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2025 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tobin v. Garciagreen2 sentences1991Jones v. Strauss, 745 S.W.2d 898, 900 (Tex.1988); Tobin v. Garcia, 159 Tex. 58 , 316 S.W.2d 396, 400-01 (1958). 1991Jones v. Strauss, 745 S.W.2d 898, 900 (Tex.1988); Tobin v. Garcia, 159 Tex. 58 , 316 S.W.2d 396, 400-01 (1958). | 4 | 4 |
Jones v. Straussgreen2 sentences1991Jones v. Strauss, 745 S.W.2d 898, 900 (Tex.1988); Tobin v. Garcia, 159 Tex. 58 , 316 S.W.2d 396, 400-01 (1958). 1991Jones v. Strauss, 745 S.W.2d 898, 900 (Tex.1988); Tobin v. Garcia, 159 Tex. 58 , 316 S.W.2d 396, 400-01 (1958). | 4 | 4 |
Ex Parte Abellgreen1 sentence2024See id.; Abell, 613 S.W.2d at 260 (stating that “when no vested substantive right has been impaired but only [a] procedure or remedy has 7 This references the State’s Objections to Ex Parte Proceedings and the Entry of Ex Parte Orders Not Expressly Authorized by Law, which is attached as Exhibit E. 8 The reporter’s record for the motions hearing (“MHRR”) will be cited as # MHRR *, where # is the volume number and * is the page number. | 1 | 1 |
Safety-Kleen Corp. v. Garciagreen1 sentence2022And even though the attorney for the relators failed to contact the court coordinator before sending the notices of submission, as the trial court website indicates is the court’s preference, the attorney for the relators informed the court coordinator (more than once) that the motions had been filed after he 4Safety-Kleen Corp. v. Garcia, 945 S.W.2d 268, 269 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, orig. proceeding). 8 filed the notices and submitted the motions for hearing. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Cullengreen1 sentence2021Appellant now asserts: “Despite this request and despite the trial court’s agreement, the record does not contain any trial court findings of fact and conclusions of law.” In State v. Cullen, 195 S.W.3d 696, 699 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
BMC Software Belgium, NV v. Marchandgreen1 sentence2015RR, Exh. 1 (email dated September 9, 2014 from Appellants’ counsel stating: “I will leave it to the court’s discretion as to the appropriated [sic] date for a Hearing on [Appellants’ motions to compel]”). 52 CR 961–68. 15 Software Belgium, N.V. v. Marchand, 83 S.W.3d 789, 800 (Tex. 2002). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Approximately $2,000,000.00 in United States Currencygreen1 sentence2012P. 329b(c), (e), (g); see also State v. Approximately $2,000,000.00 in U.S. Currency, 822 S.W.2d 721, 724 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1991, no writ) (filing of proper and timely motion to reinstate has same effect as motion for new trial in respect to extending time for perfecting appeal). -4- 04-11-00260-CV Because the trial court retained jurisdiction to rule on the motions for sanctions for 105 days from the date the nonsuit was signed, the trial court did not err in setting the motions for hearing on March 29, 2011. | 1 | 1 |
Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. Bullergreen1 sentence2006Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. Buller, 806 S.W.2d 223, 226 (Tex. 1991); Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc., 701 S.W.2d 238, 241-42 (Tex. 1985). | 1 | 1 |
Griggs v. Capitol MacHine Works, Inc.green1 sentence2006Beaumont Bank, N.A. v. Buller, 806 S.W.2d 223, 226 (Tex. 1991); Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc., 701 S.W.2d 238, 241-42 (Tex. 1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tobin v. Garcia
green
2 sentences1991Jones v. Strauss, 745 S.W.2d 898, 900 (Tex.1988); Tobin v. Garcia, 159 Tex. 58 , 316 S.W.2d 396, 400-01 (1958). 1991Jones v. Strauss, 745 S.W.2d 898, 900 (Tex.1988); Tobin v. Garcia, 159 Tex. 58 , 316 S.W.2d 396, 400-01 (1958). | 4 | 1989–1991 |
In the Interest of R.V.
green
1 sentence2025Citing In the Interest of R.V., Jr., 977 S.W.2d 777 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1998, no pet.) and For the Protection of S.M., 658 S.W.3d 876 , 877 (Tex. App.— El Paso 2022, no pet.), Appellees contend that Fran waived and is estopped from arguing that the county court or district court’s orders are void because she did not object to Judge Stem testifying at the motions hearing and agreed to the county court’s orders appointing Judge Stem as trust advisor. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Auspro Enterprises, LP v. Texas Department of Transportation
green
1 sentence2022TxDOT and its officials answered the suit and, on September 13, 2017, filed a motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction and motion for summary judgment, and set the motions for hearing on October 30, 2017.3 On October 10, 2017, before any response was filed, the parties agreed to and requested a stay of proceedings pending a final decision by the Texas Supreme Court in Auspro Enterprises, LP v. Texas Department of Transportation, 506 S.W.3d 688 (Tex. App.—Austin 2016, pet. granted, judgm’t vacated, mandate issued on April 23, 2018). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Linton v. State
green
1 sentence2014Linton, 275 S.W.3d at 502 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Dawson-Austin v. Austin
green
1 sentence2011Id. at 323 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.