Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ryals v. Pigottgreen2 sentences1999Without any further discussion, Esco references Ryals v. Pigott, 580 So.2d 1140, 1175 (Miss.1990), as his authority for this proposition. 1997Without any further discussion, Esco references Ryals v. Pigott, 580 So. 2d 1140, 1175 (Miss. 1990), as his authority for this proposition. | 2 | 2 |
Prime Rx, LLC v. McKendree, Inc.green1 sentence2009See also Prime Rx, 917 So. 2d at 795 (quoting DeBlanc, 814 So. 2d at 800 ) (when a matter is “conclusively established” under Rule 36, it may not be “offset by a conflicting answer to interrogatories.”); In re Carney, 258 F.3d at 420 (citing Dukes, 770 F.2d at 548-49 ) (“[s]ince 12 This is true unless the motions were in violation of a local rule or a pretrial order. | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of C.R.green1 sentence2009However, “[u]nder Mississippi law, the entry of a nolle prosequi unconditionally dismisses a criminal indictment, but without prejudice to the [S]tate to seek re-indictment.” In re C.R., 879 So.2d 1119, 1121 (¶ 8) (Miss.Ct.App.2004) (quoting Beckwith v. Anderson, 89 F.Supp.2d 788 , *718 792 (S.D.Miss.2000)). | 1 | 1 |
DeBlanc v. Stancilgreen1 sentence2009See also Prime Rx, 917 So. 2d at 795 (quoting DeBlanc, 814 So. 2d at 800 ) (when a matter is “conclusively established” under Rule 36, it may not be “offset by a conflicting answer to interrogatories.”); In re Carney, 258 F.3d at 420 (citing Dukes, 770 F.2d at 548-49 ) (“[s]ince 12 This is true unless the motions were in violation of a local rule or a pretrial order. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Fielder v. State
green
2 sentences1997In Fielder v. State, 500 So.2d 1002 (Miss.1987), this Court reversed and remanded the trial judge who refused to hear motions to suppress based upon the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. 1994In Fielder v. State, 500 So. 2d 1002 (Miss. 1987), this Court reversed and remanded the trial judge who refused to hear motions to suppress based upon the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. | 2 | 1994–1997 |
Haycraft v. Mid-State Construction Co.
green
1 sentence2024On June 10, 2022, Coleman filed a motion pursuant to Mississippi Rules of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5)-(6) and 70(a).4 In the motion, Coleman requested that the circuit court “compel the defendants to arbitrate [his] claims, or, alternatively, restore the case to the Court’s active docket.” At the motions hearing, counsel for the defendants argued that the case was now barred by the statute of limitations.5 4 Coleman does not discuss Rule 70(a) or its application to this case on appeal. 5 The defendants cite Haycraft v. Mid-State Construction Co., 915 So. 2d 1117 (Miss. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Carney v. Internal Revenue Service
green
1 sentence2009See also Prime Rx, 917 So. 2d at 795 (quoting DeBlanc, 814 So. 2d at 800 ) (when a matter is “conclusively established” under Rule 36, it may not be “offset by a conflicting answer to interrogatories.”); In re Carney, 258 F.3d at 420 (citing Dukes, 770 F.2d at 548-49 ) (“[s]ince 12 This is true unless the motions were in violation of a local rule or a pretrial order. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Gary Dukes and Thomas E. Barber, D/B/A D & B Dozer Service v. South Carolina Insurance Company
green
1 sentence2009See also Prime Rx, 917 So. 2d at 795 (quoting DeBlanc, 814 So. 2d at 800 ) (when a matter is “conclusively established” under Rule 36, it may not be “offset by a conflicting answer to interrogatories.”); In re Carney, 258 F.3d at 420 (citing Dukes, 770 F.2d at 548-49 ) (“[s]ince 12 This is true unless the motions were in violation of a local rule or a pretrial order. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Beckwith v. Anderson
green
1 sentence2009However, “[u]nder Mississippi law, the entry of a nolle prosequi unconditionally dismisses a criminal indictment, but without prejudice to the [S]tate to seek re-indictment.” In re C.R., 879 So.2d 1119, 1121 (¶ 8) (Miss.Ct.App.2004) (quoting Beckwith v. Anderson, 89 F.Supp.2d 788 , *718 792 (S.D.Miss.2000)). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
McDaniel v. Beane
green
1 sentence1999McDaniel, 515 So.2d at 951 . [4] The formal opinion distinguishes this use of the designation "of counsel" from those instances where an attorney or law firm is designated as being of counsel in the filing of an individual case, where "there is no general holding out as to a continuing relationship." [5] In his brief, Esco states that the issue was not raised until "oral arguments." The record clearly indicates that it was raised orally at the motions hearing on September 4, 1997. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Presley v. State
green
1 sentence1995This Court noted that the motions challenge his May, 25, 1982 sentence, vacated and remanded in Presley v. State, 474 So.2d 612 (Miss. 1985), and his additional sentence hearing and re-sentencing on remand in the Lowndes County Circuit. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.