13 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ronald Reed v. Neopost USA, Incorporatedgreen2 sentences2017Id. ' More recently, in Reed v. Neopost USA, Inc., 701 F.3d 434, 441 (5th Cir, 2012), the court expounded on a plaintiffs use of allegedly discriminatory comments made by Go-workers in making a discrimination claim and distinguished between the use of such remarks as direct evidence from those offered as additional circumstantial evidence, stating: Where a plaintiff offers remarks as circumstantial evidence alongside -other alleged discriminatory conduct, however, we apply a more flexible two-part test. 2017More recently, in Reed v. Neopost USA, Inc., 701 F.3d 434, 441 (5th Cir. 2012), the court expounded on a plaintiff’s use of allegedly discriminatory comments made by co-workers in making a discrimination claim and distinguished between the use of such remarks as direct evidence from those offered as additional circumstantial evidence, stating: Where a plaintiff offers remarks as circumstantial evidence alongside other alleged discriminatory conduct, however, we apply a more flexible two-part test. | 1 | 1 |
Bannister v. Dept. of Streetsgreen1 sentence2016Taylor v. Oakbourne Country Club, 02-1177, p. 8 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/14/03), 846 So.2d 959, 965 , writ denied, 03-2025 (La. 11/7/03), 857 So.2d 494 ; see also Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 11 (La. 1/16/96), 666 So.2d 641, 648 . | 1 | 1 |
Vivienne Rabidue v. Osceola Refining Company, a Division of Texas-American Petrochemicals, Inc.green1 sentence1992Ford v. Revlon, Inc., 153 Ariz. 38 , 734 P.2d 580, 585 (1987) (employer's repeated failure to take appropriate remedial measures, despite its awareness of employee's complaints, sufficiently outrageous to constitute intentional infliction of emotional distress). [16] In Title VII cases, the courts have held that the determination of whether a hostile environment claim exists must be based not on a consideration of each individual incident in a vacuum, but rather on the "totality of the circumstances." Andrews v. City of Philadelphia, 895 F.2d 1469, 1484 (3rd Cir.1990) (noting that "[a] play ca | 1 | 1 |
cluster 536506green1 sentence1992Ford v. Revlon, Inc., 153 Ariz. 38 , 734 P.2d 580, 585 (1987) (employer's repeated failure to take appropriate remedial measures, despite its awareness of employee's complaints, sufficiently outrageous to constitute intentional infliction of emotional distress). [16] In Title VII cases, the courts have held that the determination of whether a hostile environment claim exists must be based not on a consideration of each individual incident in a vacuum, but rather on the "totality of the circumstances." Andrews v. City of Philadelphia, 895 F.2d 1469, 1484 (3rd Cir.1990) (noting that "[a] play ca | 1 | 1 |
Ford v. Revlon, Inc.green2 sentences1992Ford v. Revlon, Inc., 153 Ariz. 38 , 734 P.2d 580, 585 (1987) (employer's repeated failure to take appropriate remedial measures, despite its awareness of employee's complaints, sufficiently outrageous to constitute intentional infliction of emotional distress). [16] In Title VII cases, the courts have held that the determination of whether a hostile environment claim exists must be based not on a consideration of each individual incident in a vacuum, but rather on the "totality of the circumstances." Andrews v. City of Philadelphia, 895 F.2d 1469, 1484 (3rd Cir.1990) (noting that "[a] play ca 1992Ford v. Revlon, Inc., 153 Ariz. 38 , 734 P.2d 580, 585 (1987) (employer's repeated failure to take appropriate remedial measures, despite its awareness of employee's complaints, sufficiently outrageous to constitute intentional infliction of emotional distress). [16] In Title VII cases, the courts have held that the determination of whether a hostile environment claim exists must be based not on a consideration of each individual incident in a vacuum, but rather on the "totality of the circumstances." Andrews v. City of Philadelphia, 895 F.2d 1469, 1484 (3rd Cir.1990) (noting that "[a] play ca | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green
green
2 sentences2005When the discrimination claim is based on circumstantial evidence, as is usually the case, the well-established burden-shifting analysis provided in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802-04 , 93 S.Ct. 1817, 1824-25 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973), applies. 2005When the discrimination claim is based on circumstantial evidence, as is usually the case, the well-established burden-shifting analysis provided in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802-04 , 93 S.Ct. 1817, 1824-25 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973), applies. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Francis v. Henderson
green
2 sentences2001Francis v. Henderson, 425 U.S. 536 , 96 S.Ct. 1708 , 48 L.Ed.2d 149 . 2001Francis v. Henderson, 425 U.S. 536 , 96 S.Ct. 1708 , 48 L.Ed.2d 149 . | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Russell v. McKinney Hosp. Venture
green
1 sentence2017Id. ' More recently, in Reed v. Neopost USA, Inc., 701 F.3d 434, 441 (5th Cir, 2012), the court expounded on a plaintiffs use of allegedly discriminatory comments made by Go-workers in making a discrimination claim and distinguished between the use of such remarks as direct evidence from those offered as additional circumstantial evidence, stating: Where a plaintiff offers remarks as circumstantial evidence alongside -other alleged discriminatory conduct, however, we apply a more flexible two-part test. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Williams v. Superior Uniform Group, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence2016Taylor v. Oakbourne Country Club, 02-1177, p. 8 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/14/03), 846 So.2d 959, 965 , writ denied, 03-2025 (La. 11/7/03), 857 So.2d 494 ; see also Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 11 (La. 1/16/96), 666 So.2d 641, 648 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Taylor v. Oakbourne Country Club
green
1 sentence2016Taylor v. Oakbourne Country Club, 02-1177, p. 8 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/14/03), 846 So.2d 959, 965 , writ denied, 03-2025 (La. 11/7/03), 857 So.2d 494 ; see also Bannister v. Department of Streets, 95-0404, p. 11 (La. 1/16/96), 666 So.2d 641, 648 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Seagrave v. Dean
green
1 sentence2012Seagrave, 908 So.2d at 45 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Langley v. Pinkerton's Inc.
green
2 sentences2009See Dorgan v. Foster, 2006 WL 2457118 (E.D.La.2006); Seal v. Gateway Companies, Inc., 2002 WL 10456 (E.D.La.2002); Langley v. Pinkerton's Inc., 220 F. Supp.2d 575 (M.D.La.2002); McKee v. Gulf States Specialties, Inc., 2001 WL 1143167 (E.D.La.2001). 2009See Dorgan v. Foster, 2006 WL 2457118 (E.D.La.2006); Seal v. Gateway Companies, Inc., 2002 WL 10456 (E.D.La.2002); Langley v. Pinkerton's Inc., 220 F. Supp.2d 575 (M.D.La.2002); McKee v. Gulf States Specialties, Inc., 2001 WL 1143167 (E.D.La.2001). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
LA DEPT. OF AGRI. & FORESTRY v. Sumrall
green
1 sentence1999Sumrall , 98-1587, p. 12, 728 So.2d at 1262-1263 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Peters v. Kiff
green
2 sentences1995The Court noted that in Peters v. Kiff, 407 U.S. 493 , 92 S.Ct. 2163 , 33 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972), a plurality opinion, it had held a person of any race had standing to bring a Due Process Clause claim challenging the exclusion of any group from petit or grand jury service. 1995The Court noted that in Peters v. Kiff, 407 U.S. 493 , 92 S.Ct. 2163 , 33 L.Ed.2d 83 (1972), a plurality opinion, it had held a person of any race had standing to bring a Due Process Clause claim challenging the exclusion of any group from petit or grand jury service. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Cox v. Glazer Steel Corp.
green
1 sentence1992The court of appeal affirmed, holding that the discrimination claim was an outgrowth of the industrial accident and thus barred by the *519 exclusive remedy of worker's compensation. 592 So.2d 425 (La.App. 4th Cir.1991). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Butler v. Flint Goodridge Hospital of Dillard University
neutral
1 sentence1992A writ was granted to consider the judgment of the court of appeal. 597 So.2d 1017 (La.1992). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Mayeaux v. Dept. of State Civil Service
green
1 sentence1984Onesta v. Department of State Civil Service, 434 So.2d 1153 (La.App. 1st Cir.1983); Mayeaux v. Department of State Civil Service, 421 So.2d 948 (La.App. 1st Cir.1982). 2 DEMOTION CLAIM Frazier contends that the abolition of his position as Welfare Case Supervisor III and his reclassification as a Human Service Supervisor constituted a demotion without just cause. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Onesta v. Department of State Civil Service
neutral
1 sentence1984Onesta v. Department of State Civil Service, 434 So.2d 1153 (La.App. 1st Cir.1983); Mayeaux v. Department of State Civil Service, 421 So.2d 948 (La.App. 1st Cir.1982). 2 DEMOTION CLAIM Frazier contends that the abolition of his position as Welfare Case Supervisor III and his reclassification as a Human Service Supervisor constituted a demotion without just cause. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.