6 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Scholz v. RDV Sports, Inc.green2 sentences2011See e.g., Valenzuela v. GlobeGround N. Am., LLC, 18 So.3d 17, 21-22 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Scholz v. RDV Sports, Inc., 710 So.2d 618, 624 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). 2009It is well-settled law that Florida courts follow the three-part framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802-804 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973), and its progeny, 1 for establishing, *22 by circumstantial evidence, a discrimination claim based on disparate treatment in the workplace. 2 See City of Hollywood v. Hogan, 986 So.2d 634, 641-42 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (age discrimination); Dep’t of Children & Family Servs. v. Garcia, 911 So.2d 171 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (gender discrimination); Scholz v. RDV Sports, Inc., 710 So.2d 618, 624 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (racial | 2 | 2 |
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Greengreen2 sentences2025As such, we follow the three-part test as outlined in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802-04 (1973), “for establishing a discrimination claim based on disparate treatment in the workplace through circumstantial evidence.” St. 2011It is well settled that Florida courts follow the three-part framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802-04 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973), for establishing a discrimination claim based on disparate treatment in the workplace through circumstantial evidence. | 1 | 3 |
St. Louis v. Florida International Universitygreen1 sentence2025Louis v. Fla. Int’l Univ., 60 So. 3d 455, 458 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011). | 1 | 1 |
cluster 757361green1 sentence2018See Wallin v. Minn. Dep’t of Corrs., 153 F. 3d 681 , 688 (8th Cir. 1998) (“[I]t is well established that retaliation claims are not reasonably related to underlying discrimination claims.”). | 1 | 1 |
Williamson v. International Paper Co.green1 sentence2018Retaliation is not “an integral part of an underlying discrimination claim, and, therefore, would not have 5 been encompassed in a reasonable investigation of plaintiff’s charge of disability harassment.” Williamson v. Int’l Paper Co., 85 F. Supp. 2d 1184, 1197 (S.D. | 1 | 1 |
Valenzuela v. Globeground North America, LLCgreen1 sentence2011See e.g., Valenzuela v. GlobeGround N. Am., LLC, 18 So.3d 17, 21-22 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009); Scholz v. RDV Sports, Inc., 710 So.2d 618, 624 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). | 1 | 1 |
King v. Stategreen1 sentence2009It is well-settled law that Florida courts follow the three-part framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802-804 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973), and its progeny, 1 for establishing, *22 by circumstantial evidence, a discrimination claim based on disparate treatment in the workplace. 2 See City of Hollywood v. Hogan, 986 So.2d 634, 641-42 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (age discrimination); Dep’t of Children & Family Servs. v. Garcia, 911 So.2d 171 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (gender discrimination); Scholz v. RDV Sports, Inc., 710 So.2d 618, 624 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (racial | 1 | 1 |
Ayers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.green1 sentence1998See Ayers v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 941 F.Supp. 1163, 1167 (M.D.Fla.1996) (granting motion *605 for summary judgment as to count alleging violation of Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA) where Ayers did not receive cause determination and waited only 117 days, rather than the required 180 days, from filing complaint with Commission before filing suit in court: "[U]nder FCRA, the complainant may only file suit if the complaint is unresolved after 180 days, and not if the complaint is dismissed.... | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
DCFS v. Garcia
green
1 sentence2009It is well-settled law that Florida courts follow the three-part framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802-804 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973), and its progeny, 1 for establishing, *22 by circumstantial evidence, a discrimination claim based on disparate treatment in the workplace. 2 See City of Hollywood v. Hogan, 986 So.2d 634, 641-42 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (age discrimination); Dep’t of Children & Family Servs. v. Garcia, 911 So.2d 171 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (gender discrimination); Scholz v. RDV Sports, Inc., 710 So.2d 618, 624 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (racial | 1 | 2009–2009 |
United States v. New York City Transit Authority
green
1 sentence2008In dismissing Donovan's complaint, the trial court relied upon the Second Circuit's decision in United States v. New York City Transit Authority, 97 F.3d 672 (2d Cir. 1996), which held that a retaliation claim could not be based on an employer's policy of denying its internal review process to employees once they had filed a complaint with an outside agency. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Fasold v. Justice
green
1 sentence2008Additionally, in Fasold v. Justice, 409 F.3d 178 (3d Cir.2005), the court held that it is unlawfully retaliatory for an employer to deny an employee's discrimination claim in a non-mandatory internal grievance proceeding because the employee filed an EEOC complaint. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.