13 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jacobs v. City of Bunkiegreen1 sentence2023See Jacobs v. City of Bunkie, 98-2510 (La. 5/18/99), 737 So. 2d 14 , 19 and n. 6 (wherein the supreme court notes that La. | 1 | 1 |
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION & DEV. v. Sugarland Ventures, Inc.green1 sentence1990This court has previously discussed this waiver in State through DOTD v. Sugarland Ventures, Inc., 476 So.2d 970, 975 (La.App. 1st Cir.1985), writ denied, 478 So.2d 909 (La.1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez
green
2 sentences2008It is also well settled that a waiver of sovereign immunity "cannot be implied but must be unequivocally expressed." Santa Clara Pueblo, 436 U.S. at 58 , 98 S.Ct. at 1677 . 2008It is also well settled that a waiver of sovereign immunity "cannot be implied but must be unequivocally expressed." Santa Clara Pueblo, 436 U.S. at 58 , 98 S.Ct. at 1677 . | 2 | 2008–2009 |
Chamberlain v. State, Through DOTD
green
2 sentences2002Using its holding in Chamberlain, 624 So.2d 874 , as a "window to better view the question" before it, the supreme court concluded that La.R.S. 40:1299.39 was not in conflict with the waiver of sovereign immunity provided for in La. 1995XII § 10, relying on the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the waiver of sovereign immunity provision in Chamberlain v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 624 So.2d 874 (La.1993). | 2 | 1995–2002 |
Smith v. Bd. of Commissioners of the La. Stadium
green
1 sentence2021Id. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Price v. United States & Osage Indians
green
2 sentences2009Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 , 98 S.Ct. 1670 , 56 L.Ed.2d 106 (1978); Price v. United States, 174 U.S. 373 , 19 S.Ct. 765 , 43 L.Ed. 1011 (1899). 2009Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez, 436 U.S. 49 , 98 S.Ct. 1670 , 56 L.Ed.2d 106 (1978); Price v. United States, 174 U.S. 373 , 19 S.Ct. 765 , 43 L.Ed. 1011 (1899). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. A & P Steel, Inc.
green
2 sentences2009Id. 2009Id. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
United States v. King
green
2 sentences2004It is settled that a waiver of sovereign immunity "`cannot be implied but must be unequivocally expressed.'" United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399 , 96 S.Ct. 948, 953 , 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976), quoting, United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 4 , 89 S.Ct. 1501, 1502 , 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969). 2004It is settled that a waiver of sovereign immunity "`cannot be implied but must be unequivocally expressed.'" United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399 , 96 S.Ct. 948, 953 , 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976), quoting, United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 4 , 89 S.Ct. 1501, 1502 , 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
United States v. Testan
green
2 sentences2004It is settled that a waiver of sovereign immunity "`cannot be implied but must be unequivocally expressed.'" United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399 , 96 S.Ct. 948, 953 , 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976), quoting, United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 4 , 89 S.Ct. 1501, 1502 , 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969). 2004It is settled that a waiver of sovereign immunity "`cannot be implied but must be unequivocally expressed.'" United States v. Testan, 424 U.S. 392, 399 , 96 S.Ct. 948, 953 , 47 L.Ed.2d 114 (1976), quoting, United States v. King, 395 U.S. 1, 4 , 89 S.Ct. 1501, 1502 , 23 L.Ed.2d 52 (1969). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Ute Distribution Corporation, a Utah Corporation v. Ute Indian Tribe
green
1 sentence2004Ute Distribution Corp. v. Ute Indian Tribe, 149 F.3d 1260 (10th Cir.1998). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Jefferson Lake Sulphur Co. v. State
green
2 sentences2002Jefferson Lake Sulphur Co. v. State, 213 La. 1 , 34 So.2d 331 (La. 1947). 2002Jefferson Lake Sulphur Co. v. State, 213 La. 1 , 34 So.2d 331 (La. 1947). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Rick v. STATE, DOTD
green
1 sentence1994This precise issue was recently presented in Rick v. State, Through Dept. of Transp. and Dev., 93-C-1776 c/w 93-C-784 (La.1994); 630 So.2d 1271 , in which we held that the limit on pre-judgment interest imposed by LSA-R.S. 13:5112(C) conflicts with the waiver of sovereign immunity set forth in LSA-Const. Art. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Sibley v. Board of Sup'rs of Louisiana State University
green
1 sentence1993The constitutionality of that ceiling was at issue in Sibley v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University, 462 So.2d 149 , vacated on reh'g, 477 So.2d 1094 (La.1985), discussed below. [9] Interestingly, one commentator forecasted that the waiver of sovereign immunity provision would be "an even more substantial [constitutional] hurdle" than the equal protection and adequate remedy provisions. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Sibley v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Louisiana State University
green
1 sentence1993The constitutionality of that ceiling was at issue in Sibley v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University, 462 So.2d 149 , vacated on reh'g, 477 So.2d 1094 (La.1985), discussed below. [9] Interestingly, one commentator forecasted that the waiver of sovereign immunity provision would be "an even more substantial [constitutional] hurdle" than the equal protection and adequate remedy provisions. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.
red
1 sentence1991Id. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT v. Sugarland Ventures, Inc.
green
1 sentence1990This court has previously discussed this waiver in State through DOTD v. Sugarland Ventures, Inc., 476 So.2d 970, 975 (La.App. 1st Cir.1985), writ denied, 478 So.2d 909 (La.1985). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Insurance Company of North America v. United States Postal Service
green
1 sentence1990Therefore, with respect to those actions “sounding in tort,” the remedies and restrictions of the FTCA apply, one of which is to vest exclusive jurisdiction over the claims in federal courts. 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (b); Insurance Company of North America v. United States Postal Service, 675 F.2d at 758 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.