6 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Nevada v. Hallred2 sentences2012See id. at 543 , 122 S.Ct. at 1005-06 , 152 L.Ed.2d at 38 (“ ‘[0]nly the sovereign’s own consent could qualify the absolute character of [its] immunity’ from suit in its own courts.” (citing Nevada v. Hall, 440 U.S. 410, 414 , 99 S.Ct. 1182, 1185 , 59 L.Ed.2d 416,421 (1979)) (second alteration in original)). 2012See id. at 543 , 122 S.Ct. at 1005-06 , 152 L.Ed.2d at 38 (“ ‘[0]nly the sovereign’s own consent could qualify the absolute character of [its] immunity’ from suit in its own courts.” (citing Nevada v. Hall, 440 U.S. 410, 414 , 99 S.Ct. 1182, 1185 , 59 L.Ed.2d 416,421 (1979)) (second alteration in original)). | 2 | 2 |
Van v. Portneuf Medical Centergreen2 sentences2019See Van, 147 Idaho at 558 , 212 P.3d at 988 ; Sanchez v. State, Dep’t of Corr., 143 Idaho 239, 244 , 141 P.3d 1108, 1113 (2006) (“It is the general rule that, under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, a governmental unit can only be sued upon its consent.”). 2019See Van, 147 Idaho at 558 , 212 P.3d at 988 ; Sanchez v. State, Dep’t of Corr., 143 Idaho 239, 244 , 141 P.3d 1108, 1113 (2006) (“It is the general rule that, under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, a governmental unit can only be sued upon its consent.”). | 1 | 1 |
Sanchez v. Stategreen2 sentences2019See Van, 147 Idaho at 558 , 212 P.3d at 988 ; Sanchez v. State, Dep’t of Corr., 143 Idaho 239, 244 , 141 P.3d 1108, 1113 (2006) (“It is the general rule that, under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, a governmental unit can only be sued upon its consent.”). 2019See Van, 147 Idaho at 558 , 212 P.3d at 988 ; Sanchez v. State, Dep’t of Corr., 143 Idaho 239, 244 , 141 P.3d 1108, 1113 (2006) (“It is the general rule that, under the doctrine of sovereign immunity, a governmental unit can only be sued upon its consent.”). | 1 | 1 |
Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinezgreen2 sentences2016See Santa Clara Pueblo, 436 U.S. at 58-59 , 98 S.Ct. at 1676-77 , 56 L.Ed.2d at 114-16 (1978) (citing to a case involving the United States’ waiver of sovereignty to analyze a tribe’s waiver). 2016See Santa Clara Pueblo, 436 U.S. at 58-59 , 98 S.Ct. at 1676-77 , 56 L.Ed.2d at 114-16 (1978) (citing to a case involving the United States’ waiver of sovereignty to analyze a tribe’s waiver). | 1 | 1 |
Raygor v. Regents of the University of Minnesotagreen2 sentences2012See id. at 543 , 122 S.Ct. at 1005-06 , 152 L.Ed.2d at 38 (“ ‘[0]nly the sovereign’s own consent could qualify the absolute character of [its] immunity’ from suit in its own courts.” (citing Nevada v. Hall, 440 U.S. 410, 414 , 99 S.Ct. 1182, 1185 , 59 L.Ed.2d 416,421 (1979)) (second alteration in original)). 2012See id. at 543 , 122 S.Ct. at 1005-06 , 152 L.Ed.2d at 38 (“ ‘[0]nly the sovereign’s own consent could qualify the absolute character of [its] immunity’ from suit in its own courts.” (citing Nevada v. Hall, 440 U.S. 410, 414 , 99 S.Ct. 1182, 1185 , 59 L.Ed.2d 416,421 (1979)) (second alteration in original)). | 1 | 1 |
Dellmuth v. Muthgreen2 sentences1992This approach was employed in Dellmuth v. Muth, 491 U.S. at 231-32, 109 S.Ct. at 2402 , and Hoffman v. Connecticut, 492 U.S. at 100-03 , 109 S.Ct. at 2822-23, to ignore what were possibly the best interpretations of the statute, because other alternate interpretations existed. 1992This approach was employed in Dellmuth v. Muth, 491 U.S. at 231-32, 109 S.Ct. at 2402 , and Hoffman v. Connecticut, 492 U.S. at 100-03 , 109 S.Ct. at 2822-23, to ignore what were possibly the best interpretations of the statute, because other alternate interpretations existed. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Carey Mills v. United States
green
2 sentences2019Id. 2019Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Hoffman v. Connecticut Department of Income Maintenance
green
1 sentence1992This approach was employed in Dellmuth v. Muth, 491 U.S. at 231-32, 109 S.Ct. at 2402 , and Hoffman v. Connecticut, 492 U.S. at 100-03 , 109 S.Ct. at 2822-23, to ignore what were possibly the best interpretations of the statute, because other alternate interpretations existed. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Indian Towing Co. v. United States
green
2 sentences1992Indian Towing v. United States, 350 U.S. 61, 68 , 76 S.Ct. 122, 126 , 100 L.Ed. 48 (1955). 1992Indian Towing v. United States, 350 U.S. 61, 68 , 76 S.Ct. 122, 126 , 100 L.Ed. 48 (1955). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Block v. North Dakota Ex Rel. Board of University & School Lands
green
2 sentences1992Once a waiver of sovereign immunity is found to exist, “those conditions must be strictly observed, and exceptions are not to be lightly implied.” Block v. North Dakota, 461 U.S. 273, 287 , 103 S.Ct. 1811, 1820 , 75 L.Ed.2d 840 (1983). 1992Once a waiver of sovereign immunity is found to exist, “those conditions must be strictly observed, and exceptions are not to be lightly implied.” Block v. North Dakota, 461 U.S. 273, 287 , 103 S.Ct. 1811, 1820 , 75 L.Ed.2d 840 (1983). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Loeffler v. Frank
green
2 sentences1992I agree with the majority that “[ajbsent a waiver of sovereign immunity by Congress, the United States cannot be sued,” ante at 292 (citing Loeffler v. Frank, 486 U.S. 549 , 108 S.Ct. 1965 , 100 L.Ed.2d 549 (1988)), and that the conditions of a waiver “must be strictly observed, and exceptions are not to be lightly implied.” Ante at 292 (quoting Block v. North Dakota, 461 U.S. 273, 287 , 103 S.Ct. 1811, 1820 , 75 L.Ed.2d 840 (1983)). 1992I agree with the majority that “[ajbsent a waiver of sovereign immunity by Congress, the United States cannot be sued,” ante at 292 (citing Loeffler v. Frank, 486 U.S. 549 , 108 S.Ct. 1965 , 100 L.Ed.2d 549 (1988)), and that the conditions of a waiver “must be strictly observed, and exceptions are not to be lightly implied.” Ante at 292 (quoting Block v. North Dakota, 461 U.S. 273, 287 , 103 S.Ct. 1811, 1820 , 75 L.Ed.2d 840 (1983)). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.