viability claim (Missouri) · Go Syfert
← Missouri issues

viability claim in Missouri

13 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Nunngreen
cal · 1956 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001While the exact definition of “good faith” may vary depending on the context in which it is used, “in common usage [it] has a well-defined and generally understood meaning[.]” State v. A.G., 670 S.W.2d 516, 517 (Mo. App.1984) (quoting People v. Nunn, 46 Cal.2d 460 , 296 P.2d 813, 816 (Ca.1956)).

2001While the exact definition of “good faith” may vary depending on the context in which it is used, “in common usage [it] has a well-defined and generally understood meaning[.]” State v. A.G., 670 S.W.2d 516, 517 (Mo. App.1984) (quoting People v. Nunn, 46 Cal.2d 460 , 296 P.2d 813, 816 (Ca.1956)).

11
State v. A.G.green
moctapp · 1984 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
1 sentence

2001While the exact definition of “good faith” may vary depending on the context in which it is used, “in common usage [it] has a well-defined and generally understood meaning[.]” State v. A.G., 670 S.W.2d 516, 517 (Mo. App.1984) (quoting People v. Nunn, 46 Cal.2d 460 , 296 P.2d 813, 816 (Ca.1956)).

11
Burnett v. Griffithgreen
mo · 1987 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988
1 sentence

1988Most recently, the viability of this principle was reaffirmed in Burnett v. Griffith, 739 S.W.2d 712, 714 (Mo. banc 1987).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (24)

CaseCitedYears
In Re RG green
illappct · 1988
2 sentences

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

21989–1989
In Re Christina H. green
calctapp · 1986
2 sentences

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

21989–1989
In the Interest of J.P.B. green
iowa · 1988
2 sentences

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal. Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App. 1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

21989–1989
In Re the Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action No. J-3824 green
ariz · 1981
2 sentences

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

21989–1989
People in Interest of VMR green
coloctapp · 1989
2 sentences

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal. Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App. 1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

21989–1989
In Interest of DW green
iowa · 1986
2 sentences

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal. Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App. 1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

21989–1989
In the Interest of Rushing green
kanctapp · 1984
2 sentences

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

21989–1989
People v. Daniels green
illappct · 1988
2 sentences

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal. Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App. 1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

21989–1989
State v. Gray green
moctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2020Id.

12020–2020
Marie v. Standard Steel Works green
mo · 1959
1 sentence

2002Marie, 319 S.W.2d 871 .

12002–2002
McGhee v. Dixon green
mo · 1998
1 sentence

2000Nevertheless, the majority opinion in McGhee expressly stated in footnote 2 that since the appellant did not attack the viability of the rule of avoidable consequences, the Court did not address the issue. 973 S.W.2d at 850 .

12000–2000
State v. Chandler green
moctapp · 1993
1 sentence

1997Blankenship, 830 S.W.2d at 12 . 4 Perhaps in response to Blankenship’s questioning of Oliver , in 1993 the Eastern District appears to have sub silencio overruled Oliver in State v. Chandler, 860 S.W.2d 823 (Mo.App.

11997–1997
State v. Blankenship green
mo · 1992
1 sentence

1997Blankenship, 830 S.W.2d at 12 . 4 Perhaps in response to Blankenship’s questioning of Oliver , in 1993 the Eastern District appears to have sub silencio overruled Oliver in State v. Chandler, 860 S.W.2d 823 (Mo.App.

11997–1997
Rambo v. Lawson red
mo · 1990
2 sentences

1995The viability standard is not in the plain language of the statute; it is not consistent with the common law; it is incongruous with reason. 799 S.W.2d at 71 .

1995The viability standard is not in the plain language of the statute; it is not consistent with the common law; it is incongruous with reason. 799 S.W.2d at 71 .

11995–1995
Horton v. California green
scotus · 1990
2 sentences

1992Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 , 110 S.Ct. 2301 , 110 L.Ed.2d 112 (1990). [11] Earlier this year, the Supreme Court held the second requirement under Batson is no longer a prerequisite to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination.

1992Horton v. California, 496 U.S. 128 , 110 S.Ct. 2301 , 110 L.Ed.2d 112 (1990). [11] Earlier this year, the Supreme Court held the second requirement under Batson is no longer a prerequisite to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination.

11992–1992
Steggall Ex Rel. Stegall v. Morris green
mo · 1953
2 sentences

1990The viability standard for determining when a wrongful death action arises for prenatal injury was first addressed by Missouri courts in Steggall v. Morris, 363 Mo. 1224 , 258 S.W.2d 577 (1953).

1990The viability standard for determining when a wrongful death action arises for prenatal injury was first addressed by Missouri courts in Steggall v. Morris, 363 Mo. 1224 , 258 S.W.2d 577 (1953).

11990–1990
Barnes v. Tools & MacHinery Builders, Inc. green
mo · 1986
2 sentences

1990The viability of the defense of contributory fault was also acknowledged in Barnes v. Tools & Machinery Builders, Inc., 715 S.W.2d 518 (Mo. banc 1986).

1990The viability of the defense of contributory fault was also acknowledged in Barnes v. Tools & Machinery Builders, Inc., 715 S.W.2d 518 (Mo. banc 1986).

11990–1990
In Re Trowbridge green
michctapp · 1986
2 sentences

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

11989–1989
Care & Protection of Stephen green
mass · 1987
2 sentences

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

11989–1989
Orneika J. v. Harriet J. green
nyappdiv · 1985
2 sentences

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

11989–1989
Department of Social & Health Services v. Moseley green
washctapp · 1983
2 sentences

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

11989–1989
Matter of Bishop green
ncctapp · 1989
2 sentences

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

1989In the Matter of Appeal in Gila County Juvenile Action, 130 Ariz. 530 , 637 P.2d 740 (1981); Matter of Christina H., 182 Cal.App.3d 47 , 227 Cal.Rptr. 41 (1986); People in the Interest of V.M.R. 768 P.2d 1268 (Colo.App.1989); In re R.G., 165 Ill.App.3d 112 , 116 Ill.Dec. 69 , 518 N.E.2d 691 (1988); In the Interest of J.P.B., 419 N.W.2d 387 (Iowa 1988); In the Interest of D.W., 385 N.W.2d 570 (Iowa 1986); In the Interest of Rushing, 9 Kan.App.2d 541 , 684 P.2d 445 (1984); In re Stephen, 401 Mass. 144 , 514 N.E.2d 1087 (1987); Matter of Trowbridge, 155 Mich.App. 785 , 401 N.W.2d 65 (1986); In re

11989–1989
State v. Baldwin green
mo · 1927
2 sentences

1986It should be noted that an identifying witness may testify concerning his pretrial identification of a suspect and the same was approved without qualification in State v. Rima, 395 S.W.2d 102 (Mo.1965), overruling State v. Baldwin, 317 Mo. 759 , 297 S.W. 10 (Mo.1927) which had held the admission to such testimony error.

1986It should be noted that an identifying witness may testify concerning his pretrial identification of a suspect and the same was approved without qualification in State v. Rima, 395 S.W.2d 102 (Mo.1965), overruling State v. Baldwin, 317 Mo. 759 , 297 S.W. 10 (Mo.1927) which had held the admission to such testimony error.

11986–1986
State v. Rima green
mo · 1965
2 sentences

1986It should be noted that an identifying witness may testify concerning his pretrial identification of a suspect and the same was approved without qualification in State v. Rima, 395 S.W.2d 102 (Mo.1965), overruling State v. Baldwin, 317 Mo. 759 , 297 S.W. 10 (Mo.1927) which had held the admission to such testimony error.

1986It should be noted that an identifying witness may testify concerning his pretrial identification of a suspect and the same was approved without qualification in State v. Rima, 395 S.W.2d 102 (Mo.1965), overruling State v. Baldwin, 317 Mo. 759 , 297 S.W. 10 (Mo.1927) which had held the admission to such testimony error.

11986–1986

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MO § Mo. Rev. Stat. § 565.021 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CA 49 (1970–2026) NY 44 (1971–2026) TX 38 (1978–2026) IL 37 (1978–2026) PA 25 (1976–2024) FL 22 (1985–2022) NJ 18 (1960–2026) CT 17 (1977–2025) IA 17 (1990–2025) MI 15 (1975–2025) GA 14 (1978–2025) MD 13 (1975–2026) AL 13 (1973–2026) MO 13 (1986–2020) LA 9 (1968–2026) VA 8 (1987–2024) MA 8 (1993–2025) OH 8 (1984–2025) NC 7 (2000–2021) VT 7 (1985–2013) MS 7 (1984–2022) TN 7 (1999–2011) DE 6 (1993–2026) WI 6 (1974–2013) WA 5 (1983–2020) AZ 5 (1984–2022) CO 5 (1986–2018) KS 5 (1981–2025) NV 5 (1970–2021) OK 4 (1989–2016) ND 4 (2000–2008) IN 4 (1999–2012) NM 4 (1995–2016) WY 4 (1986–1994) MN 4 (1994–2019) RI 4 (1980–2016) OR 3 (2016–2025) KY 3 (1998–2026) NE 3 (2018–2023) ME 3 (1976–2016) UT 3 (2003–2017) SC 3 (1993–2021) HI 2 (1980–1997) DC 2 (2008–2023) WV 2 (1982–1997)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check