Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1960–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kirk v. City of Newarkgreen2 sentences1998See Kirk v. City of Newark, 109 N.J. at 187 , 536 A. 2d 229 . 1998See Kirk v. City of Newark, 109 N.J. at 187 , 536 A. 2d 229 . | 1 | 1 |
Dwyer v. Ford Motor Co.green1 sentence1981Equally applicable to occupational disease cases occurring, as does this case, prior to January 10, 1980, is the principle of the standard of proof required in heart and cerebral accident cases by Dwyer v. Ford Motor Co., 36 N.J. 487, 493 (1962), and Walck, supra ; Giambattista, supra 32 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
Dudley v. Victor Lynn Lines, Inc.green1 sentence1960We may better resolve the question "by directly viewing the problem in terms of medical causation within the framework of the requirement that the injury or death `arise out of' the employment." Dudley v. Victor Lynn Lines, Inc., 32 N.J. 479, 491 (1960). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Miller v. Miller
green
2 sentences1985The framework for analysis of the issue on this appeal is provided by Miller v. Miller, 97 N.J. 154 (1984). 1985The framework for analysis of the issue on this appeal is provided by Miller v. Miller, 97 N.J. 154 (1984). | 2 | 1985–1985 |
Briglia v. Exxon Co., USA
green
2 sentences2018This showing of good cause is the standard established by Rule 4:19 and, accordingly, should be the standard utilized to alter what has, by custom, become the normal conduct of IMEs under the rule. [ Id. at 502-03 , 708 A.2d 1246 .] The Briglia court furthered explained that "[t]here does not appear to be a compelling justification for a blanket rule either allowing or prohibiting recording devices or the attendance of *379 attorneys at IMEs in all cases." Id. at 503 , 708 A.2d 1246 . 2018This showing of good cause is the standard established by Rule 4:19 and, accordingly, should be the standard utilized to alter what has, by custom, become the normal conduct of IMEs under the rule. [ Id. at 502-03 , 708 A.2d 1246 .] The Briglia court furthered explained that "[t]here does not appear to be a compelling justification for a blanket rule either allowing or prohibiting recording devices or the attendance of *379 attorneys at IMEs in all cases." Id. at 503 , 708 A.2d 1246 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Muhammad
green
2 sentences2012“Our Evidence Rules generally promote admissibility of all relevant evidence, N.J.R.E. 402, and ‘evince a more expansive approach to the admission of evidence.’ ” State v. Muhammad, 359 N.J.Super. 361, 388 , 820 A.2d 70 (App.Div.2003) (quoting A.S. 2012“Our Evidence Rules generally promote admissibility of all relevant evidence, N.J.R.E. 402, and ‘evince a more expansive approach to the admission of evidence.’ ” State v. Muhammad, 359 N.J.Super. 361, 388 , 820 A.2d 70 (App.Div.2003) (quoting A.S. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Pacifico v. Pacifico
green
2 sentences2011Our decision in Pacifico v. Pacifico, 190 N.J. 258 , 920 A.2d 73 (2007), provides the framework for our analysis. 2011Our decision in Pacifico v. Pacifico, 190 N.J. 258 , 920 A.2d 73 (2007), provides the framework for our analysis. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Peper v. Princeton University Board of Trustees
green
2 sentences2011Bd. of Trs., 77 N.J. 55, 82-83 , 389 A. 2d 465 (1978) (adopting federal approach used in determining Title VII cases as a framework for analysis, when useful and fair, in discrimination claims brought under state law). 2011Bd. of Trs., 77 N.J. 55, 82-83 , 389 A. 2d 465 (1978) (adopting federal approach used in determining Title VII cases as a framework for analysis, when useful and fair, in discrimination claims brought under state law). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Sczyrek v. County of Essex
green
2 sentences2007With Suarez and Shore as a framework for our analysis, we now consider Sczyrek, supra, 324 N.J.Super. 235 , 735 A. 2d 33 , on which the motion judge relied when he granted summary judgment to the City. 2007With Suarez and Shore as a framework for our analysis, we now consider Sczyrek, supra, 324 N.J.Super. 235 , 735 A. 2d 33 , on which the motion judge relied when he granted summary judgment to the City. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Newburgh v. Arrigo
green
1 sentence1988On remand, the issue is to be addressed within the framework of the factors set forth in Newburgh v. Arrigo, supra . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.
green
2 sentences1982Plainly, these plaintiffs are not public figures for all purposes; neither possesses the requisite "pervasive fame or notoriety." Id. 1982Plainly, these plaintiffs are not public figures for all purposes; neither possesses the requisite “pervasive fame or notoriety.” Id. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Giambattista v. Thomas A. Edison
green
2 sentences1981Equally applicable to occupational disease cases occurring, as does this case, prior to January 10, 1980, is the principle of the standard of proof required in heart and cerebral accident cases by Dwyer v. Ford Motor Co., 36 N.J. 487, 493 (1962), and Walck, supra ; Giambattista, supra 32 N.J. 1981Equally applicable to occupational disease cases occurring, as does this case, prior to January 10, 1980, is the principle of the standard of proof required in heart and cerebral accident cases by Dwyer v. Ford Motor Co., 36 N.J. 487, 493 (1962), and Walck, supra ; Giambattista, supra 32 N.J. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Walck v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.
green
1 sentence1981Equally applicable to occupational disease cases occurring, as does this case, prior to January 10, 1980, is the principle of the standard of proof required in heart and cerebral accident cases by Dwyer v. Ford Motor Co., 36 N.J. 487, 493 (1962), and Walck, supra ; Giambattista, supra 32 N.J. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Rosenberg v. Town of North Bergen
green
2 sentences1978In the Rosenberg opinion Justice Mountain points up that the available materials treating the legislative history of N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1 "are meager and unrevealing." Id. 61 N.J. at 194 . 1978In the Rosenberg opinion Justice Mountain points up that the available materials treating the legislative history of N.J.S.A. 2A:14-1.1 "are meager and unrevealing." Id. 61 N.J. at 194 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.